Should the US help North Korea in wake of train disaster?

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
azskyman
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4104
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2003 7:36 am
Location: Scottsdale Arizona
Contact:

#21 Postby azskyman » Tue Apr 27, 2004 6:41 pm

We're perhaps one of the only nations in the world where that question even comes up? Should we help those in trouble? It's expected of us...yet can come back to bite us too.

I'd be in favor of reasonable humanitarian assistance alongside others who are helping too.

No cash!
0 likes   

GalvestonDuck
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 15941
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)

#22 Postby GalvestonDuck » Tue Apr 27, 2004 6:47 pm

Now that I've read this:

In 1994, the United States and North Korea reached another agreement. In exchange for the North Koreans freezing their nuclear-weapons program, the Americans promised to provide aid for oil imports. But four years later, the United States detected the North Koreans constructing a huge new underground nuclear complex. The famine-plagued Communist country then demanded massive food shipments before it would allow inspections of this underground facility. In March 1999, the Clinton administration agreed to give North Korea $60 million in food assistance.


I've changed my mind and I agree with Steve -- no cash!
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests