12z GFS is nuts with arctic air... 474dm heights

Winter Weather Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Valkhorn
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 492
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 4:09 am
Contact:

12z GFS is nuts with arctic air... 474dm heights

#1 Postby Valkhorn » Mon Dec 15, 2003 1:03 pm

I'll let the graphics speak for themselves

Image

Image

The -30C isotherm is huge in the last 90 hours or so, and mean heights as low as 474dm.

My take is that the GFS is trying to grasp at the obvious cross-polar flow setting up but it's not clicking. I think the GFS is still out to lunch but I do think it's pretty spot on with the cold air intrusion in Canada. The trouble with this model is it isn't really reading the patterns and I'm afraid what it's forecasting is just its bias.

I thought I'd show this for spits and giggles. Take your bets folks on how low the GFS is going to go with heights this winter. My guess is it'll try to get to 470dm or lower in the next few weeks and the -40C line will rear its ugly head in the north of Canada on the GFS long range runs.

Any bets for a -50C line in January? C'mon, it's the GFS... place your bets :)
0 likes   

Fishmn

#2 Postby Fishmn » Mon Dec 15, 2003 1:44 pm

The GFS is usually -15F off in the winter months in the long range. I'm suprised that anyone even tries to give it creedance. Its still nice to look at though. Ah if it could verify once, I'd be a happy camper. There has to be at least once in its history that its been accurate that far out, but I cant remember it.
0 likes   

Valkhorn
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 492
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 4:09 am
Contact:

#3 Postby Valkhorn » Mon Dec 15, 2003 2:50 pm

Indeed, it is interesting to look at :)

I sometimes think the GFS is just "odd" in the winter months. It knows what it's trying to say but the words get stuck halfway. So, it ends up being discombobulated by the end of the run :P
0 likes   

User avatar
RNS
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 522
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2003 6:29 pm
Location: Saylorsburg PA
Contact:

Re: 12z GFS is nuts with arctic air... 474dm heights

#4 Postby RNS » Mon Dec 15, 2003 6:04 pm

Valkhorn wrote:I'll let the graphics speak for themselves

Image

Image

The -30C isotherm is huge in the last 90 hours or so, and mean heights as low as 474dm.

My take is that the GFS is trying to grasp at the obvious cross-polar flow setting up but it's not clicking. I think the GFS is still out to lunch but I do think it's pretty spot on with the cold air intrusion in Canada. The trouble with this model is it isn't really reading the patterns and I'm afraid what it's forecasting is just its bias.

I thought I'd show this for spits and giggles. Take your bets folks on how low the GFS is going to go with heights this winter. My guess is it'll try to get to 470dm or lower in the next few weeks and the -40C line will rear its ugly head in the north of Canada on the GFS long range runs.

Any bets for a -50C line in January? C'mon, it's the GFS... place your bets :)


I wouldin/t place bets on the GFS at that range...it has a severe cold bias...and as a result has a tendency to blow things out of proportion with regard to the amount of cold air present in any given location. the second thing is the models run-to-run consistency and long range skill...both of which lack. IOW...the model is very inconsistent in the meadium range...and is normally too cold. the ECM (european model) skill is much higher in the MR. not to mention the ECM has fewer biases (aside from the fact that it likes to hold back energy in the southern branch).
0 likes   

Valkhorn
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 492
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 4:09 am
Contact:

#5 Postby Valkhorn » Mon Dec 15, 2003 6:39 pm

Well of course I'm not taking this as something set in stone. I just thought it was something funny to share :)
0 likes   

Guest

#6 Postby Guest » Mon Dec 15, 2003 7:47 pm

I would not use the 384 hr GFS to blow the snot out of my nose
0 likes   

User avatar
Chris the Weather Man
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 746
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 9:49 pm
Location: NJ

#7 Postby Chris the Weather Man » Tue Dec 16, 2003 5:39 pm

DT wrote:I would not use the 384 hr GFS to blow the snot out of my nose

LOL!! Good One DT!
0 likes   


Return to “Winter Weather”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests