Congress Pushes for larger Military
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- ameriwx2003
- Category 4
- Posts: 980
- Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 10:45 am
- CaptinCrunch
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 8731
- Age: 57
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 4:33 pm
- Location: Kennedale, TX (Tarrant Co.)
- CaptinCrunch
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 8731
- Age: 57
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 4:33 pm
- Location: Kennedale, TX (Tarrant Co.)
- streetsoldier
- Retired Staff
- Posts: 9705
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 11:33 pm
- Location: Under the rainbow
An OBVIOUS solution, and one I have brought up before, is to have each State Governor authorize, equip and staff a State Military Reserve...one that is made up of STATE troops, never to be Federalized, working within their own State under the direction of the Governor or the State Adjutant General.
30 of the 50 States HAVE such state troops already...and all states may have such bodies, as they are authorized under Federal law. This would "free up" Reserves and NGs to serve overseas, and still not strip the States of a trained cadre of troops for civil unrest, emergencies, etc.
Missouri is in process of raising such a body as we speak; some of the more notable States that have active Guards or Military Reserves are TX, CA, NY, OH, TN and MS, while others have authorization, but not activated.
30 of the 50 States HAVE such state troops already...and all states may have such bodies, as they are authorized under Federal law. This would "free up" Reserves and NGs to serve overseas, and still not strip the States of a trained cadre of troops for civil unrest, emergencies, etc.
Missouri is in process of raising such a body as we speak; some of the more notable States that have active Guards or Military Reserves are TX, CA, NY, OH, TN and MS, while others have authorization, but not activated.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests