"WE WON!"

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
StormCrazyIowan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6599
Age: 42
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 8:13 pm
Location: Quad Cities, IA
Contact:

#21 Postby StormCrazyIowan » Fri Dec 05, 2003 9:22 am

Bravo Bush for the pass!! It IS definitely about time them tree hugging enviro-MENTALS are put in their place!! :D
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#22 Postby Lindaloo » Fri Dec 05, 2003 9:55 am

That is excellent news Dennis. There are always that one or two that holler 'Save the spotted owl" or "Save those birds" when in fact, when and if there is a forest fire the birds and owls can merely fly away home. Ya just can't move property and people die in those fires trying to save their property. Gosh, wish folks had wings and balloons under their homes.
0 likes   

Suzi Q

Dennis

#23 Postby Suzi Q » Fri Dec 05, 2003 12:14 pm

Personally, I cannot even believe that you think I would not CARE about human life or the loss thereof whatsoever. I was SIMPLY trying to state my opinion (flawed as you so aptly pointed out and believe). There are always two sides to every story. Obviously, I'll keep my opinions to myself in the future. I meant no offense whatsoever. I was merely posing another realm of thought, which you seem to have no tolerance for. My mistake.
0 likes   

janswizard
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 586
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 3:08 am
Location: Fort Pierce, FL

#24 Postby janswizard » Fri Dec 05, 2003 12:27 pm

I think I asked this before and got a scathing reply from someone - but what constitutes a tree-hugger? And is it possible for a tree-hugger to also believe that thinning our forests is good for the environment? I ask because I think there are many people out there (myself included) who want to see our forests preserved but realize this can only be accomplished by forestry management.
0 likes   
Note: Opinions expressed are my own. Please look to the NHC for the most accurate information.

User avatar
mf_dolphin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 17758
Age: 68
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 2:05 pm
Location: St Petersburg, FL
Contact:

Re: Um, a kinda dissenting opinion

#25 Postby mf_dolphin » Fri Dec 05, 2003 1:01 pm

eb4480 wrote:Ok, I'm gonna catch alot of flack for this, but so be it. I understand the need for thinning, but what about the environmenal impact this cutting and logging will have? Aren't the old trees where some of our birds prefer to nest? And what about the impact those logging trucks rolling in and out will have on the habitat for various creatures? Aren't we talking about a possible secondary succession? No, I'm not putting more value on critter life than human life but, IMO, once again it seems to me that public policy is REACTING to a situation rather than being PROACTIVE prior to an undesirable situation occurring. And yes, I am one of those "tree huggers" that some on here view as "mutants" for lack of a better term. Just trying to voice an opinion for the "other side".


EB, I count myself a conservationist but I have to agree with the policy change. We need to thin the forests to keep them healthy and protect the forest as a whole. Logging today is a far cry from the slash and burn of days gone by. As Dennis pointed out, the industry is planting more trees than they are cutting now. Sensible management of this resource just ensures that we'll have healthy trees for the next generation. :-)
0 likes   

User avatar
azsnowman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8591
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 8:56 pm
Location: Pinetop Arizona. Elevation 7102' (54 miles west of NM border)

#26 Postby azsnowman » Fri Dec 05, 2003 7:59 pm

Well.....to be REAL honest janswizard, I've never met a tree hugger that I'd sit down and have a beer with :lol:

eb4480.....I guess I took your post a little too serious, for that, I sincerly apologize, it's just after seeing 480,000 acres of Virgin forests go up in smoke last year, another 28,000 acres of another virgin forest go up this year, my sister in laws house going up in flames, my best friend killed, ALL this because of someone's agenda, someone who has no clue as to what our forests are like and "NO" I'm not refering to you, it's the radical environmentalists from the Sierra Club, The Forest Guardians, Southwest Center for Biological Diversity. The SAD part, they are the ones who are responsible for these fires and now that the trees they fought so hard to defend, are now gone.......in fact, I'm making furniture out of the wood harvested from the Rodeo Chediski Fire!

I'm tellin' ya, Bush has MY vote this coming election along with the other 30,000 residents of the White Mountains!

Dennis
0 likes   

User avatar
azsnowman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8591
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 8:56 pm
Location: Pinetop Arizona. Elevation 7102' (54 miles west of NM border)

#27 Postby azsnowman » Sat Dec 06, 2003 9:04 am

This is kinda long but take the time to read it.....this explains a LOT! We work pretty close with Prof. Wally Covington on some of our enviro studies.

Rain can help curb bark beetles
Moisture can fortify trees to fight off insect infestations

Shaun McKinnon
The Arizona Republic
Nov. 29, 2003 12:00 AM




Facts about bark beetles


What you should know about the infestation in Arizona:

QUESTION: Where did all these bark beetles come from?

ANSWER: Pine bark beetles are as common as butterflies in a healthy forest, according to Wally Covington, director of the Ecological Restoration Institute at Northern Arizona University.

Ordinarily, trees repel attacks by producing pitch, or sap, which keeps beetle eggs from hatching and keeps the adult insects from burrowing more deeply. Prolonged drought and poor conditions in Arizona's forests have overstressed trees, leaving them vulnerable to infestation. Many trees simply can't defend themselves anymore.

Q: What trees are affected most?

A: Ponderosa and piñon pine trees are most often attacked.

Q: How many trees have been infected?

A: It's hard to tell, but aerial surveys suggest the number could exceed 23 million across Arizona's forests. Bark beetles have destroyed more acres of trees than wildfires during the past two years.

Q: Will the dead trees increase wildfire danger?

A: Yes. The dry treetops can aid the spread of "crown fires," an especially destructive form of wildfire that burns hot and destroys quickly. Once the needles and the trees themselves fall, the risk of groundfire will climb and the heavy amounts of fuel could help feed crown fires in the remaining trees.

Q: How many bark beetles are in the forests?

A: Impossible to tell. Scientists were estimating an infestation in the trillions in 2002. One tree can be infested by hundreds even thousands of beetles at once.

Q: What happens to an infested tree?

A: The beetles burrow in through the outer bark to lay eggs. When those eggs hatch, the new beetles chew away at the tree's inner bark, choking off the flow of moisture and nutrients to the rest of the tree. Needles change color from dark green to a rust red before falling off. When the new beetles are mature enough, they fly off to another tree and start the process over again.

Q: How do bark beetles find weakened trees?

A: Beetles can detect a volatile compound emitted by stressed pine trees, according to the University of Arizona Cooperative Extension Service. The insects then give off a pheromone to attract other beetles.

Q: Is it possible to spray for beetles?

A: No pesticides have proved effective to kill beetles once they have attacked a tree, according to the extension service. Several pesticides can prevent attacks, but forest-wide spraying is impractical and far too costly.

Q: What else can be done?

A: Reducing the number of trees in a given area will allow those that remain to grow stronger, according to the university extension service. If you own land with trees that have not been infected, contact a professional arborist about thinning the area. If the area has infected trees, get rid of them quickly.

Q: What happens to the trees that have been attacked?

A: Most of them die. If they're not removed, they will fall eventually.

Q: Will the hardest-hit forests recover?

A: Some of them will, but it could take decades or even a century or more. In forests with the heaviest infestation, entire stands of trees could be lost, forever altering the local ecosystem, scientists say.


If you love trees, pray for rain.

Scientists say the estimated 23 million ponderosa and piñon pine trees that have succumbed to bark beetles in Arizona's forests were so weakened by a prolonged drought that they were unable to fend off the first wave of the tiny bugs.

Whether those bugs return for another helping next year depends on how much moisture the coming winter brings. If the drought persists, the beetles will thrive again, producing an army of trillions. If precipitation levels climb nearer to normal, the added moisture could fortify trees and keep the bugs from multiplying in such vast numbers.

"One storm, with a couple of inches of rain, seems to have an impact," said Tom DeGomez, a forest-health specialist for the University of Arizona's Cooperative Extension Service in Flagstaff. "We saw that after a storm hit in February and put enough moisture in the ground to help the trees when the beetles came out."

Even if the weather cooperates, the beetles' true toll on Arizona's forests may not be clear for years or even decades, scientists say. Aerial surveys of the state's millions of acres of pine trees have already produced a startling portrait of widespread destruction, but those are just the most visible evidence of what could be deeper, permanent losses.

"It's still very unclear to us how extensive this potentially could be," said John Anhold, an entomologist and forest-health specialist for the U.S. Forest Service in Flagstaff.

"The beetles have done a number in a lot of the forests that were of poor quality. The (Mogollon) Rim country really got nailed. But now, they have to move out of there into areas that are in better condition," he said. "It's taking more beetles to overcome these healthier trees."

Foresters believe their current damage estimate of 23 million dead pine trees is conservative; the toll is expected to rise when aerial surveys are fully analyzed in a few weeks. Those numbers could grow next year when additional surveys are conducted.

That's what happened between last year and this year. The aerial tours wrapped up last August, but the beetle hordes continued to spread into the fall. As a result, the 2002 counts were too low and the 2003 counts include trees lost the previous year.

In all, beetles infested more acres of trees during those two years than were burned by wildfires, even accounting for the calamitous "Rodeo-Chediski" blaze.

The latest surveys indicate the infestation spread fastest in the Kaibab National Forest in northern Arizona and the Tonto National Forest northeast of Phoenix.

At the end of 2002's survey, 49,125 ponderosa pines in the Kaibab were dead; the 2003 survey counted 1,063,706. In the Tonto, the toll rose from 495,810 dead trees to 8,157,970 at the start of this autumn.

Losses were equally grim in and around Prescott, where more than 4.1 million trees have succumbed, and on the San Carlos and Fort Apache reservations, where the damage covers nearly 200,000 acres of eastern Arizona.

The dead trees pose a fire danger, though not significantly higher because the forests overall are so dry.

"This summer, lightning would hit a tree attacked by bark beetles, and it wasn't exploding or taking off any differently than normal trees," said Gary Roberts, fire-prevention officer for the Tonto forest's Payson district. "But give it a couple more years, and they will become much more volatile."

Most of the trees will remain standing for a few years, said DeGomez, of the University of Arizona.

Their needles will fall first, then their twigs and, in four or five years, the trees themselves will begin to topple, weaving a carpet of dry, dead wood that will spread flames faster than typical groundcover.

Prolonged drought jump-started the current bug attack, weakening the ponderosa and piñon pines so much that they were unable to defend themselves. Most experts agree it was a confluence of events - what DeGomez describes as a "perfect storm" - that allowed the invasion to spiral.

"The bark beetle has always been around as a natural thinning agent for forests," Roberts said, "but the forests are too dense, too thick."

A century ago, 20 to 40 pine trees filled each acre in Arizona's forests, compared with 160 to 1,000 or more today, which increases the competition for water and other resources. A drought now is much more stressful on trees than it would have been 50 years ago, Roberts said.

"If we don't thin them out, those forests will burn to the ground," he said. "One way or another, nature is going to set things in balance. If we've interrupted things, it's going to be doing it on its terms rather than ours."

Although scientists have never been able to study the effects of a beetle infestation on wildfires, it's clear that the bugs are creating fuel sources, said Wally Covington, director of the Ecological Restoration Institute at Northern Arizona University.

Some of the worst fires that swept forests around San Bernardino, Calif., last month occurred in areas also hit hard by bark beetles.

"Those were huge blowups," Covington said. "Fires that do occur in beetle stands are going to be extremely severe. We've dodged a bullet so far . . . but there will definitely be fires."

Over the long term, the beetle attacks could alter local ecosystems by allowing invasive plant species to gain a foothold, Covington said. If the drought persists and the forests remain dense, beetles will continue to wipe out huge swaths, until little remains of the state's population of pine trees.

"Clearly, this is a crisis," he said. "We are absolutely dependent on the high country in Arizona, for water, for biological diversity, for human habitat. We've got to think big and act big."



Dennis
0 likes   

User avatar
azsnowman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8591
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 8:56 pm
Location: Pinetop Arizona. Elevation 7102' (54 miles west of NM border)

#28 Postby azsnowman » Sat Dec 06, 2003 9:11 am

Now I ask.......HOW on EARTH can you argue against THIS statement?

"If we don't thin them out, those forests will burn to the ground," he said. "One way or another, nature is going to set things in balance. If we've interrupted things, it's going to be doing it on its terms rather than ours."


BTW.......SORRY for the misprint, I said over 200 million trees, when in reality, it's 23 million, my bad!

Dennis
0 likes   

User avatar
azsnowman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8591
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 8:56 pm
Location: Pinetop Arizona. Elevation 7102' (54 miles west of NM border)

#29 Postby azsnowman » Sun Dec 07, 2003 8:02 am

I'm tellin' ya, "IF" we don't hurry up and get some moisture, the upcoming fire season will begin in Feb.....PLEASE pray for snow, rain, ANYKIND of moisture at this point in time!

Dennis
0 likes   

User avatar
azsnowman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8591
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 8:56 pm
Location: Pinetop Arizona. Elevation 7102' (54 miles west of NM border)

#30 Postby azsnowman » Sun Dec 07, 2003 8:12 am

Wally Covington started an Experimental Forest back in 1974 in Hart prairie near Flagstaff, all the forestry students at NAU have to work the forest keeping it thinned to Pre European Conditions, of which I refer to all the time, 20-30 trees per acre, talk about a BEAUTIFUL forest!

"A century ago, 20 to 40 pine trees filled each acre in Arizona's forests, compared with 160 to 1,000 or more today, which increases the competition for water and other resources. A drought now is much more stressful on trees than it would have been 50 years ago, Roberts said."


Dennis
0 likes   

User avatar
blizzard
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2527
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 2:04 am
Location: Near the Shores of Gitche Gumme

#31 Postby blizzard » Sun Dec 07, 2003 9:41 am

azsnowman wrote:P/S......as blizzard had in his sig at one time, "Have you ever tried plastic toilet tissue?"


Good time to put my sig back on huh? Dennis., Congratulations to all who fought for this legislation to finally pass.
0 likes   

User avatar
blizzard
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2527
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 2:04 am
Location: Near the Shores of Gitche Gumme

#32 Postby blizzard » Mon Dec 08, 2003 10:32 am

This reminds me of the other day when I was talking to my 12 year old daughter. She has a teacher in school that is obviously a enviro-terrorist. She was telling the class that cutting the forests like this is bad news for the environment and the earth. This coming from a teacher that teaches in a community where the three major industries rely on forest products. Without forest products, this community would fold immediately. I sat down with my daughter and talked about the other points of managed forestry. She wasn't buying it. The kids now days are being brainwashed by the teachers and I am getting fed up with it. They should at least present both sides of an argument so that the kids learn debating skills and can learn to make decisions on their own.

**End of Rant**
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests