SouthFLTropics wrote:That is not Melissa on the GFS
At this distance the models can break things apart but still end up at the right solution
Moderator: S2k Moderators
SouthFLTropics wrote:That is not Melissa on the GFS

MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS wrote:Absolutely nutso run from HAFS-B; 884 mbar, 173.4 knots at 126 hours and it looks like higher at 132 (which I don't have access to):
https://i.imgur.com/sIAb01V.png

KirbyDude25 wrote:MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS wrote:Absolutely nutso run from HAFS-B; 884 mbar, 173.4 knots at 126 hours and it looks like higher at 132 (which I don't have access to):
https://i.imgur.com/sIAb01V.png
Amazingly, the experimental v2.2.1-B version of the model is even more absurd, with a peak of 873 mb and 186 knots. Again, definitely overcooked, but the western Caribbean (especially Jamaica and Cuba) should be keeping a very close eye on this storm



KirbyDude25 wrote:MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS wrote:Absolutely nutso run from HAFS-B; 884 mbar, 173.4 knots at 126 hours and it looks like higher at 132 (which I don't have access to):
https://i.imgur.com/sIAb01V.png
Amazingly, the experimental v2.2.1-B version of the model is even more absurd, with a peak of 873 mb and 186 knots. Again, definitely overcooked, but the western Caribbean (especially Jamaica and Cuba) should be keeping a very close eye on this storm




CrazyC83 wrote:MarioProtVI wrote:Tekken_Guy wrote:
Melissa is not a threat to the northeast. Most evidence points to it going out to sea after the Cuba hit.
They said that when Sandy first formed. Then look what happened.
Also 12z CMC just hates me to the fact that’s literally on Halloween and under a week before the gubernatorial election here in NJ, just like how Sandy was in 2012 with the presidential election. The fact some 12z EURO AIFS members start bending it back west towards the U.S. is not helping.
If anything, the atmosphere next week looks even more chaotic than in 2012. You're going to have not one, but at least two opportunities to draw it in as it looks like at least two troughs will come through. The big question is whether a ridge can build in between the two as the first trough lifts - that would be the difference. Or if this can outrace the first trough (less likely).




Spacecoast wrote:A few ensemble members from GenCast / FNV3 approach, or cross SFL. Maybe 5 members out of 360 (only 1.5%).
[url]https://i.ibb.co/M5k4XZHM/grd1.jpg [/url]


ChrisH-UK wrote:Google Cyclone ML has the intensity modelling with 9 been Tropical storm, 4 Cat 1, 5 Cat2, 7 Cat 3, 7 Cat 4 and 14 been Cat 5 with the highest Speed been 179 knots and 897mb. Now with the lack of tropical cyclone activity this year in the Caribbean there is so much energy in the waters I wouldn't be surprised if it went nuclear like some models are showing. Where ever she goes it's going to apocalyptic.
Google Weather Lab - Tropical Cyclone Model
[url]https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/800x600q70/924/Ork9sn.png [/url]
aspen wrote:GFS once again refuses to back down on its quick Hispaniola scenario.
The ICON stalls over Haiti after a Cat 2/3 landfall, which would be horrifically devastating if it occurred. Fortunately it probably won’t.


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests