NATL: IMELDA - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 148541
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: NATL: IMELDA - Hurricane - Discussion

#561 Postby cycloneye » Wed Oct 01, 2025 3:50 pm

From 5 PM discussion: NHC has it up to 90kt in 12 hours. Will it be a little more than that and try to reach cat 3?

The GFS and ECMWF indicate some strengthening
could occur in the near term due to baroclinic interaction, and this
is reflected in the NHC intensity forecast
3 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 502
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:43 pm

Re: NATL: IMELDA - Hurricane - Discussion

#562 Postby MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS » Wed Oct 01, 2025 3:55 pm

We will find out soon; recon in the plane now
0 likes   
Emily '87, Felix '95, Gert '99, Fabian '03, Humberto '19, Paulette '20, Teddy '20, Fiona '22, Lee '23, Ernesto '24, Humberto/Imelda '25

MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 502
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:43 pm

NATL: IMELDA - Recon Update= Last mission to Imelda underway

#563 Postby MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS » Wed Oct 01, 2025 4:04 pm

Turning now for first center pass NW to SE
0 likes   
Emily '87, Felix '95, Gert '99, Fabian '03, Humberto '19, Paulette '20, Teddy '20, Fiona '22, Lee '23, Ernesto '24, Humberto/Imelda '25

hipshot
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 618
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:18 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

Re: NATL: IMELDA - Hurricane - Discussion

#564 Postby hipshot » Wed Oct 01, 2025 4:14 pm


Man, that little blue area on the right of the video sure looks small! :(
0 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9041
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: NATL: IMELDA - Hurricane - Discussion

#565 Postby aspen » Wed Oct 01, 2025 4:35 pm

AF301’s barometer isn’t working so we’re going to have to wait for a dropsonde to figure out Imelda’s current pressure.

Winds on the NE side are incredibly weak.
1 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10180
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: NATL: IMELDA - Hurricane - Discussion

#566 Postby Sciencerocks » Wed Oct 01, 2025 4:40 pm

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2878
Age: 27
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: NATL: IMELDA - Hurricane - Discussion

#567 Postby kevin » Wed Oct 01, 2025 4:44 pm

Dramatic difference between quadrants. NE quadrant has 51 kt FL wind, SE quadrant has 97 kt FL wind so far.
0 likes   

User avatar
Kazmit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2258
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:49 am
Location: Bermuda

Re: NATL: IMELDA - Hurricane - Discussion

#568 Postby Kazmit » Wed Oct 01, 2025 4:50 pm

Landfall will be a close call. The exact center might be just offshore as the eye passes. The backside will be much worse than the front, that's for sure- 12z Euro says 50kts on the front and 80kts on the back.
0 likes   
Igor 2010, Sandy 2012, Fay 2014, Gonzalo 2014, Joaquin 2015, Nicole 2016, Humberto 2019, Imelda 2025

I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2878
Age: 27
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: NATL: IMELDA - Hurricane - Discussion

#569 Postby kevin » Wed Oct 01, 2025 4:53 pm

Dropsonde supports 967 - 970 mb. 98 kt peak FL winds support 85 - 90 kt.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Teban54
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3785
Joined: Sat May 19, 2018 1:19 pm

Re: NATL: IMELDA - Hurricane - Discussion

#570 Postby Teban54 » Wed Oct 01, 2025 5:09 pm

kevin wrote:Dropsonde supports 967 - 970 mb. 98 kt peak FL winds support 85 - 90 kt.

https://i.imgur.com/OVyPSny.png

Pressure is about the same as the last recon mission, if not dropped slightly, which is in line with worse satellite appearance (particularly a less clear eye). The slight increase in wind speed could mean that it's catching up with the pressure, or that Imelda is tightening up.

It's also possible that Imelda actually peaked earlier when the eye was at the clearest... We'll see with the next pass.
0 likes   

ryxn314
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2024 11:54 pm

Re: NATL: IMELDA - Hurricane - Discussion

#571 Postby ryxn314 » Wed Oct 01, 2025 5:10 pm

It looks like it likely missed the window for major status. Ah well, I'll take CAT 2. The season needed at least 1 middle-intensity storm.
2 likes   

User avatar
Travorum
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 623
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2023 9:36 am
Location: Dunedin, FL

Re: NATL: IMELDA - Hurricane - Discussion

#572 Postby Travorum » Wed Oct 01, 2025 5:24 pm

The VDM from the first pass reports no eyewall remaining. Imelda is likely past it's prime structurally but frontal interaction could produce some nasty gusts for Bermuda. Stronger winds may be present in the W or SW because of this, we'll see on the next pass.
1 likes   

MarioProtVI
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1032
Age: 24
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2019 7:33 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: NATL: IMELDA - Hurricane - Discussion

#573 Postby MarioProtVI » Wed Oct 01, 2025 5:35 pm

Combined with the recon pass showing a dissolved eyewall and a huge temp spike, this is rapidly undergoing extratropical transition as the front is basically crashing on the center now. Should be fully EX by 03-06z, though I’m pretty sure NHC will continue advisories afterwards until it passes Bermuda and the threat diminishes.
2 likes   

User avatar
Kazmit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2258
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:49 am
Location: Bermuda

Re: NATL: IMELDA - Hurricane - Discussion

#574 Postby Kazmit » Wed Oct 01, 2025 5:39 pm

Maybe a little north of the forecast track?

Image
0 likes   
Igor 2010, Sandy 2012, Fay 2014, Gonzalo 2014, Joaquin 2015, Nicole 2016, Humberto 2019, Imelda 2025

I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10180
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: NATL: IMELDA - Hurricane - Discussion

#575 Postby Sciencerocks » Wed Oct 01, 2025 5:54 pm

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6241
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: NATL: IMELDA - Hurricane - Discussion

#576 Postby cheezyWXguy » Wed Oct 01, 2025 6:17 pm

Teban54 wrote:
kevin wrote:Dropsonde supports 967 - 970 mb. 98 kt peak FL winds support 85 - 90 kt.

https://i.imgur.com/OVyPSny.png

Pressure is about the same as the last recon mission, if not dropped slightly, which is in line with worse satellite appearance (particularly a less clear eye). The slight increase in wind speed could mean that it's catching up with the pressure, or that Imelda is tightening up.

It's also possible that Imelda actually peaked earlier when the eye was at the clearest... We'll see with the next pass.

You’re probably right about it peaking earlier when they eye briefly cleared. I believe all runs of the 12z hurricane model suite (hwrf, hmon, hafs a/b) showed a peak in the early afternoon around 90-95kt, with the exception of one of the hafs that forecast over 100kt. Therefore I think it’s conceivable that a peak of 90kt or so was reached between recon passes, but I don’t see much justification for an upgrade to cat3. Especially since convection hasn’t been exceptionally deep outside of intermittent bursts and increased frontal interaction seems to mean a larger disconnect between FL winds and surface winds. Close but no cigar imo.
3 likes   

ryxn314
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2024 11:54 pm

Re: NATL: IMELDA - Hurricane - Discussion

#577 Postby ryxn314 » Wed Oct 01, 2025 6:58 pm

cheezyWXguy wrote:
Teban54 wrote:
kevin wrote:Dropsonde supports 967 - 970 mb. 98 kt peak FL winds support 85 - 90 kt.

https://i.imgur.com/OVyPSny.png

Pressure is about the same as the last recon mission, if not dropped slightly, which is in line with worse satellite appearance (particularly a less clear eye). The slight increase in wind speed could mean that it's catching up with the pressure, or that Imelda is tightening up.

It's also possible that Imelda actually peaked earlier when the eye was at the clearest... We'll see with the next pass.

You’re probably right about it peaking earlier when they eye briefly cleared. I believe all runs of the 12z hurricane model suite (hwrf, hmon, hafs a/b) showed a peak in the early afternoon around 90-95kt, with the exception of one of the hafs that forecast over 100kt. Therefore I think it’s conceivable that a peak of 90kt or so was reached between recon passes, but I don’t see much justification for an upgrade to cat3. Especially since convection hasn’t been exceptionally deep outside of intermittent bursts and increased frontal interaction seems to mean a larger disconnect between FL winds and surface winds. Close but no cigar imo.


Stop, I'm getting flashbacks about the Sally upgrade to 110mph from 105mph :cry: that close but no cigar prevented 2020 from having 8 majors which would have been a standalone record. The amount of what could have beens I could talk about. It still pains me that 2021 got so close to Adria with all of October wasted.
1 likes   

MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 502
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:43 pm

Re: NATL: IMELDA - Hurricane - Discussion

#578 Postby MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS » Wed Oct 01, 2025 7:32 pm

Core more clear on radar now. Or what’s left of it.

Image
1 likes   
Emily '87, Felix '95, Gert '99, Fabian '03, Humberto '19, Paulette '20, Teddy '20, Fiona '22, Lee '23, Ernesto '24, Humberto/Imelda '25

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 148541
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: NATL: IMELDA - Hurricane - Discussion

#579 Postby cycloneye » Wed Oct 01, 2025 7:43 pm

Still a cat 2 hurricane at 00z Best Track:

AL, 09, 2025100200, , BEST, 0, 318N, 664W, 85, 971, HU
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6241
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: NATL: IMELDA - Hurricane - Discussion

#580 Postby cheezyWXguy » Wed Oct 01, 2025 8:09 pm

ryxn314 wrote:
cheezyWXguy wrote:
Teban54 wrote:Pressure is about the same as the last recon mission, if not dropped slightly, which is in line with worse satellite appearance (particularly a less clear eye). The slight increase in wind speed could mean that it's catching up with the pressure, or that Imelda is tightening up.

It's also possible that Imelda actually peaked earlier when the eye was at the clearest... We'll see with the next pass.

You’re probably right about it peaking earlier when they eye briefly cleared. I believe all runs of the 12z hurricane model suite (hwrf, hmon, hafs a/b) showed a peak in the early afternoon around 90-95kt, with the exception of one of the hafs that forecast over 100kt. Therefore I think it’s conceivable that a peak of 90kt or so was reached between recon passes, but I don’t see much justification for an upgrade to cat3. Especially since convection hasn’t been exceptionally deep outside of intermittent bursts and increased frontal interaction seems to mean a larger disconnect between FL winds and surface winds. Close but no cigar imo.


Stop, I'm getting flashbacks about the Sally upgrade to 110mph from 105mph :cry: that close but no cigar prevented 2020 from having 8 majors which would have been a standalone record. The amount of what could have beens I could talk about. It still pains me that 2021 got so close to Adria with all of October wasted.

It’s funny you mention Sally. I was at the time, and still am, of the opinion that Sally ‘20 deserved the upgrade to major at landfall while Zeta ‘20 didn’t. But that can be discussed in a “hurricane hills to die on” thread in the talkin’ tropics forum if someone ever creates it, haha.
2 likes   


Return to “2025”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests