Nimbus wrote:Not sure what the GFS is seeing this run for the NE turn but as you noted probably has something to do with slower approach.

Moderator: S2k Moderators
Nimbus wrote:Not sure what the GFS is seeing this run for the NE turn but as you noted probably has something to do with slower approach.
Emmett_Brown wrote:18Z GEFS ensemble has a larger spread by Thursday than the 12Z run did, feels like it is going backwards as far as certainty goes. A lot of members hanging back in the GOM on Friday.
BobHarlem wrote:18z HAFS A/B and HMON are significantly right of the 12z so far out to 60 hours or so, and slower. and stronger.
Hypercane_Kyle wrote:
HAFS closer resembles the 4k NAM sometimes. Such an overcooked scenario is borderline absurd.
xironman wrote:Hypercane_Kyle wrote:
HAFS closer resembles the 4k NAM sometimes. Such an overcooked scenario is borderline absurd.
They are not super out of line with HWRF or HMON, a very different model than the NAM 4K. I would expect a convection allowing model like the 4k to overdo tropical weather.
Hypercane_Kyle wrote:
HAFS closer resembles the 4k NAM sometimes. Such an overcooked scenario is borderline absurd.
xironman wrote:
Still no sub 900, the HAFSA did get to 901 though
ConvergenceZone wrote:Hypercane_Kyle wrote:
HAFS closer resembles the 4k NAM sometimes. Such an overcooked scenario is borderline absurd.
I always wonder, if models like this are overdoing intensity so often, why don't they just tweak the code that feeds into the model?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests