cheezyWXguy wrote:I’ve been watching the last several runs of these models for key details, and here’s what I’ve gathered:
- from run to run, there’s a general consistency with when the gyre takes shape, but there is notable inconsistency in where/when/how the resultant TC forms. Sometimes from an area of vorticity on the periphery of the gyre, sometimes from the gyre itself.
- earlier, stronger development is inversely related to the strength of whatever epac tc forms in the same time period. I’m not sure how legitimate the epac tc is. I am also not sure why the epac tc exerts influence on the Atlantic tc, but seemingly not vice-versa. Maybe someone can answer this
NHC currently gives a 0/50 chance for the Caribbean system, but not the other side of Central America. The only AOI they have in the EPAC is much further west at 110-120W. So yeah, they seem to think the EPAC storm near Central America is just a phantom, even though it's been showing up on GFS multiple times and occasionally also the CMC.
As a side note, after last night's 0z run, this thread was full of people thinking development may not occur at all. Looks like those discussions are now gone after the 12z suite. This is why you don't get hung up on single-run "trends".