Stormcenter wrote:GFS is showing a landfall on Sept. 27-28 timeframe.
That’s only a week away. I don’t like it.
Don't like the idea of landfall on the 27/28? Well I don't even "buy it"! For that matter, I'm highly doubting that any EPAC tropical cyclone will develop either. While I'm on my "won't develop rant, Stratton suggests the present Model confusion reminds him of how the models could not see (distinguish) Hurricane Michael from the CAG.
So, kinda like the expression "can't see the forest for the trees", right?
Just NO

There is no tree, and there is NO CAG. And that's the point. Models do what they're supposed to do but the "user" (us) need keep a perspective of what is happening in real time. A disturbance typically requires a couple days to organize, right? Hell, a CAG certainly takes a few days to evolve (if not a week). The reason that models keep pushing back the clock like an "abort mission" is because as we approach any semblance of a model forecast countdown, it realizes that there's no rocket on the launchpad
Look, I have no idea why Nina missed her flight or who neutered the MJO but until some other factor removes the kryptonite from the remainder of this hurricane season then neither Superman nor Batman will save this Riddler of a season.
One must also remember that to blame the models is akin to blaming the mailman. Us humans dont understand how we failed to anticipate the stable & unfavorable conditions throughout the tropics for most of the season. We hypothesize, rationalize, make excuses, and eventually attempt to self correct. Computer model forecasts do the same exact thing but rather than waive their arms and talk like we do, they simply produce graphics instead
