![Image](https://i.imgur.com/qYHaqTf.jpg)
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/62kEXoq.jpg)
Moderator: S2k Moderators
CrazyC83 wrote:The only thing that could be an issue is if there are so many Invests in rapid fire that numbers are used so quickly, it could create confusion.
One thing I would change for depressions and PTC's is that instead of "(number)", I would call them "(number-L)". I think we've adapted enough that having the L indicator would create consistency with the EPAC and CPAC. For example, TD 11 in the Atlantic in 2022 would become TD 11-L.
wxman57 wrote:Quite an advancement. We've been producing a 7-day outlook for 20+ years. Each disturbance gets its own individual number that we track across the basin until it develops or dissipates.
Hurricanehink wrote:wxman57 wrote:Quite an advancement. We've been producing a 7-day outlook for 20+ years. Each disturbance gets its own individual number that we track across the basin until it develops or dissipates.
Just curious, how many disturbances warrant advisories each year?
Users browsing this forum: abjolly, AnnularCane, Brent, Chris90, Craters, floridasun, gib, Hurricane2022, HurricaneBrain, IsabelaWeather, KirbyDude25, LarryWx, skyline385 and 66 guests