EPAC: JULIA - Models
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- cheezyWXguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 5566
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
To my eyes, it looks like 12z GFS crashes 91L into CA without development, then develops something off South America into this. The vorticity was just behind 91L in the ECar.
3 likes
- cheezyWXguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 5566
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
Teban54 wrote:
To my eyes, it looks like 12z GFS crashes 91L into CA without development, then develops something off South America into this. The vorticity was just behind 91L in the ECar.
Agreed. Probably another phantom, but we are getting to the time of year where setups like this actually happen. Will the blind squirrel finally find his nut?
1 likes
- Category5Kaiju
- Category 5
- Posts: 3438
- Age: 22
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 12:45 pm
- Location: Seattle
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
Seems like it's loosely associated with 91L.
0 likes
Unless explicitly stated, all information covered in my posts is based on my opinions and observations. Please refer to a professional meteorologist or an accredited weather research agency otherwise, especially if serious decisions must be made in the event of a potentially life-threatening tropical storm or hurricane.
- chris_fit
- Category 5
- Posts: 3078
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 11:58 pm
- Location: Tampa Bay Area, FL
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
12Z EPS slight tick up in activity but nothing that really raises an eyebrow yet...
3 likes
- Iceresistance
- Category 5
- Posts: 8931
- Age: 20
- Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 9:45 am
- Location: Tecumseh, OK/Norman, OK
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
chris_fit wrote:12Z EPS slight tick up in activity but nothing that really raises an eyebrow yet...
https://i.imgur.com/fyBOE6r.png
Basically, any uptick of activity would raise an eyebrow, even if it's by a little.
1 likes
Bill 2015 & Beta 2020
Winter 2020-2021
All observations are in Tecumseh, OK unless otherwise noted.
Winter posts are focused mainly for Oklahoma & Texas.
Take any of my forecasts with a grain of salt, refer to the NWS, SPC, and NHC for official information
Never say Never with weather! Because ANYTHING is possible!
Winter 2020-2021
All observations are in Tecumseh, OK unless otherwise noted.
Winter posts are focused mainly for Oklahoma & Texas.
Take any of my forecasts with a grain of salt, refer to the NWS, SPC, and NHC for official information
Never say Never with weather! Because ANYTHING is possible!
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
This is not 91L but a wave after it or a CAG from South America
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 6:48 am
- Location: HOLLYWOOD.FL
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
I agree. The dates don't match up with the models
0 likes
hurricanelonny
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
I'm surprised nobody mentioned the uptick in the 18Z EPS.
1 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- cheezyWXguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 5566
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
lando wrote:
This is not 91L but a wave after it or a CAG from South America
The only evidence I see of this second system on a model other than the gfs is the 0z icon, which isn’t saying much because I can only see the surface or 500mb vorticity on TT. It appears that second system, were it to actually develop, would come from trailing vorticity that splits from 91L as it passes South America.
0 likes
- ElectricStorm
- Category 5
- Posts: 4623
- Age: 23
- Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
- Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
GFS back on board with development, has a major heading towards Belize
0 likes
I am in no way a professional. Take what I say with a grain of salt as I could be totally wrong. Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.
Boomer Sooner!
Boomer Sooner!
- REDHurricane
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 210
- Age: 26
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2022 2:36 pm
- Location: Northeast Pacific Ocean
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
ElectricStorm wrote:GFS back on board with development, has a major heading towards Belize
Nah, if you look closely you'll see that the GFS randomly spins up another separate area of vorticity after 91L runs into Nicaragua starting at ~168 hours out -- this CAG convection bias has been the GFS' favorite phantom storm generator all season and tells me that this run has nearly zero chance of verifying
0 likes
- ElectricStorm
- Category 5
- Posts: 4623
- Age: 23
- Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
- Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
REDHurricane wrote:ElectricStorm wrote:GFS back on board with development, has a major heading towards Belize
Nah, if you look closely you'll see that the GFS randomly spins up another separate area of vorticity after 91L runs into Nicaragua starting at ~168 hours out -- this CAG convection bias has been the GFS' favorite phantom storm generator all season and tells me that this run has nearly zero chance of verifying
Yeah looking at the 850 vort it looks like you're right.
In that case it gets to 1003mb before landfall so maybe that still counts as development Either way I still think this develops in the W Caribbean but we'll see
0 likes
I am in no way a professional. Take what I say with a grain of salt as I could be totally wrong. Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.
Boomer Sooner!
Boomer Sooner!
- cheezyWXguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 5566
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
REDHurricane wrote:ElectricStorm wrote:GFS back on board with development, has a major heading towards Belize
Nah, if you look closely you'll see that the GFS randomly spins up another separate area of vorticity after 91L runs into Nicaragua starting at ~168 hours out -- this CAG convection bias has been the GFS' favorite phantom storm generator all season and tells me that this run has nearly zero chance of verifying
You’re right, it’s not 91L that the gfs spins up into a major, but that area doesn’t originate from the cag. Watch the 850mb vorticity and you’ll see that some trailing vorticity splits off after it passes the lesser Antilles. GEFS shows something similar, with members starting to pop up in the east-central Caribbean. Icon shows a hint of this too. There could be something to this, but we need more continuity.
Another note, just because the gfs has a notorious cag bias doesn’t mean it will always be wrong when it shows it. Climatologically, we are getting to the time of year where a cag scenario is actually plausible. Again, not the scenario the gfs is showing at the moment, but even if it were a broken clock is still right twice a day.
1 likes
- skyline385
- Category 5
- Posts: 2574
- Age: 33
- Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:15 pm
- Location: Houston TX
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
cheezyWXguy wrote:REDHurricane wrote:ElectricStorm wrote:GFS back on board with development, has a major heading towards Belize
Nah, if you look closely you'll see that the GFS randomly spins up another separate area of vorticity after 91L runs into Nicaragua starting at ~168 hours out -- this CAG convection bias has been the GFS' favorite phantom storm generator all season and tells me that this run has nearly zero chance of verifying
You’re right, it’s not 91L that the gfs spins up into a major, but that area doesn’t originate from the cag. Watch the 850mb vorticity and you’ll see that some trailing vorticity splits off after it passes the lesser Antilles. GEFS shows something similar, with members starting to pop up in the east-central Caribbean. Icon shows a hint of this too. There could be something to this, but we need more continuity.
Another note, just because the gfs has a notorious cag bias doesn’t mean it will always be wrong when it shows it. Climatologically, we are getting to the time of year where a cag scenario is actually plausible. Again, not the scenario the gfs is showing at the moment, but even if it were a broken clock is still right twice a day.
ICON's genesis is from the actual 91L, GFS builds up spurious vorticity from SA and develops the second system. The 850mb vorticity plot also looks like a classic GFS certified solution with two systems extremely close to each other.
https://twitter.com/AndyHazelton/status/1577061136708403200
1 likes
- cheezyWXguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 5566
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
skyline385 wrote:cheezyWXguy wrote:REDHurricane wrote:
Nah, if you look closely you'll see that the GFS randomly spins up another separate area of vorticity after 91L runs into Nicaragua starting at ~168 hours out -- this CAG convection bias has been the GFS' favorite phantom storm generator all season and tells me that this run has nearly zero chance of verifying
You’re right, it’s not 91L that the gfs spins up into a major, but that area doesn’t originate from the cag. Watch the 850mb vorticity and you’ll see that some trailing vorticity splits off after it passes the lesser Antilles. GEFS shows something similar, with members starting to pop up in the east-central Caribbean. Icon shows a hint of this too. There could be something to this, but we need more continuity.
Another note, just because the gfs has a notorious cag bias doesn’t mean it will always be wrong when it shows it. Climatologically, we are getting to the time of year where a cag scenario is actually plausible. Again, not the scenario the gfs is showing at the moment, but even if it were a broken clock is still right twice a day.
ICON's genesis is from the actual 91L, GFS builds up spurious vorticity from SA and builds the second system. The 850mb vorticity plot also looks like a classic GFS certified solution with two systems extremely close to each other.
https://i.imgur.com/0FQoqT0.png
https://twitter.com/AndyHazelton/status/1577061136708403200?s=20&t=bhoXSc2KPjnUrHLXCuJjhw
Again, it could be spurious (hence “need more continuity” but it’s not from SA or the CAG.
ICON does develop 91L but shows a hint of the trailing system too, though it’s harder to tell if it comes off of SA when only looking at 500mb
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests