ATL: IDA - Remnants - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
- Category 2
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2021 3:26 pm
- skyline385
- Category 5
- Posts: 2728
- Age: 35
- Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:15 pm
- Location: Houston TX
Re: ATL: IDA - Hurricane - Discussion
CrazyC83 wrote:Dropsonde suggests 986 mb. The previous pass likely missed the true center.
Watch recon put a 988mb fix instead

On another note, cold pink towers popping through the center...
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34002
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: ATL: IDA - Hurricane - Discussion
skyline385 wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:Dropsonde suggests 986 mb. The previous pass likely missed the true center.
Watch recon put a 988mb fix instead
On another note, cold pink towers popping through the center...
It was 988/20.
0 likes
Re: ATL: IDA - Hurricane - Discussion
Yep, I think RI is recommencing right now. The minor disruption by Cuba only managed to prevent further intensification over land and the hour or so afterwards, but that's it. For a second it looked like the eyewall damage may be a significant inhibitor, but in classical Ida fashion she took care of that before we even had time to discuss its implications at length. If Cuba didn't exist this would already have been a cat 2/3. But not to get anyone's hopes up, this version of Ida will be at that level as well quite soon.
4 likes
Re: ATL: IDA - Hurricane - Discussion
I hope not too soon! I'm hoping the ridge stays strong and Ida jogs west. Not to wish it on anybody else, just sayin'.
0 likes
- skyline385
- Category 5
- Posts: 2728
- Age: 35
- Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:15 pm
- Location: Houston TX
- ConvergenceZone
- Category 5
- Posts: 5194
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
- Location: Northern California
-
- Category 2
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2021 3:26 pm
Re: ATL: IDA - Hurricane - Discussion
New violent upshear wrap. This should close off an eyewall
0 likes
Re: ATL: IDA - Hurricane - Discussion
Images say more than words, so instead of me explaining here's Ida's WV loop to show its recovery from Cuba:
7 likes
- skyline385
- Category 5
- Posts: 2728
- Age: 35
- Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:15 pm
- Location: Houston TX
Re: ATL: IDA - Hurricane - Discussion
ConvergenceZone wrote:
At least it's dropped somewhat.....
Well the 12Z SHIPS was initialized at 50 kt (65kt/72hr RI threshold = 41%) whereas this one is at 70 kt (45kt/36hr RI threshold = 48%) so if anything it looks like it went up (48% vs 41% for 115 kt in 36hrs vs 72hrs). Also, there is an additional 55kt/48hr RI threshold = 36% now which is pretty high probability...
9 likes
Re: ATL: IDA - Hurricane - Discussion
Jumping in late night here from California.
A word of warning to those saying that the slight weakening might prevent a Cat 5 from happening -- have we forgotten how small of a span of time it takes a hurricane to spool up in the past decade? Michael was a minimal cat 1 on October 8th (12utc), and made landfall less than 60 hours later (1830utc) on October 10th as a monster cat 5, and that's with a period of weakening the night of the 8th.
And as always, because it needs to be said: There is absolutely no difference in terms of danger to loss of life and property from a 155mph Cat4 and a 158mph Cat5 storm. The ballyhoo about the specific category misses the mark -- even if it doesn't "have time" to make it to Cat 5, a strengthening cat 4 is still a complete monster and in many cases still a "worst case scenario" for those living along the coast in Louisiana.
A word of warning to those saying that the slight weakening might prevent a Cat 5 from happening -- have we forgotten how small of a span of time it takes a hurricane to spool up in the past decade? Michael was a minimal cat 1 on October 8th (12utc), and made landfall less than 60 hours later (1830utc) on October 10th as a monster cat 5, and that's with a period of weakening the night of the 8th.
And as always, because it needs to be said: There is absolutely no difference in terms of danger to loss of life and property from a 155mph Cat4 and a 158mph Cat5 storm. The ballyhoo about the specific category misses the mark -- even if it doesn't "have time" to make it to Cat 5, a strengthening cat 4 is still a complete monster and in many cases still a "worst case scenario" for those living along the coast in Louisiana.
14 likes
Re: ATL: IDA - Hurricane - Discussion
Looking at the IR sats and knowing how much time of the guld it has left, would be very suprised if it's not ending up Cat4 at least.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: IDA - Hurricane - Discussion
This is looking really impressive tonight. Consistent upshear convective hot towers. Likely another RI phase inbound. The hurricane models don't see this right now, and the intensity consensus on tropical tidbits from the 06 UTC suite is unrepresentative. That's my take. This is bombing right now.
8 likes
Very useful information on the Dvorak Technique --
https://severe.worldweather.wmo.int/TCF ... kBeven.pdf
https://severe.worldweather.wmo.int/TCF ... kBeven.pdf
-
- Tropical Depression
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 4:45 pm
- Location: Zagreb, Croatia
- Contact:
Re: ATL: IDA - Hurricane - Discussion
1 likes
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should NOT be used as such. It is just the my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC, NWS products and Donald Trump twitter account.
-
- Category 2
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2021 3:26 pm
Re: ATL: IDA - Hurricane - Discussion
USTropics wrote:Radar presentation continues to improve:
https://i.imgur.com/FzBeUkY.gif
That is remarkable to go from so ragged to relatively symmetrical in just a few frames. I would guess the core is properly venting and doesn't have much in the way of shear or dry air.
0 likes
Re: ATL: IDA - Hurricane - Discussion
grapealcoholic wrote:Should be a major by sunrise
If it intensifies that fast there will be serious panic along the coast (not that there isn't already).
0 likes
Re: ATL: IDA - Hurricane - Discussion
Nice giant feeder band, also eye outline clearly visible.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4966
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests