ATL: IDA - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9620
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: IDA - Models

#821 Postby Steve » Thu Aug 26, 2021 10:14 pm

jaguars_22 wrote:Nam shows pressure at 896… omg if that ever happens :)


I forgot to mention that it’s also good for laughter.
3 likes   

IcyTundra
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1205
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2021 9:32 pm
Location: Dickinson, Texas

Re: ATL: IDA - Models

#822 Postby IcyTundra » Thu Aug 26, 2021 10:14 pm

0Z ICON is further west.
0 likes   

AxaltaRacing24
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1753
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: ATL: IDA - Models

#823 Postby AxaltaRacing24 » Thu Aug 26, 2021 10:19 pm

Steve wrote:
Sciencerocks wrote:
cycloneye wrote:00z Guidance.


https://i.imgur.com/iLSVVJJ.png



My thinking is for this to be more like a low to mid end cat2 by landfall. I wouldn't be shocked if it got stronger but chances are it won't be a cat4 or 5.


Yeah, I think 4 or 5 are unlikely as well if not impossible. Earlier I guessed 70% at Cat 3. Not sure I'm that high anymore - probably more like 40-45%. But since they sample so much stuff now, they may be able to find at least an extended gust into Cat 3 territory over the Gulf. Glad to see an extreme slowdown is probably off the table too. I'm a wuss and not really ready to make a call like I have for the last 25 years on here or CFHC. But I feel like it will landfall between Slidell and Marsh Island with the zoomed in range of Cocodrie to Centerville/Patterson (just west of Morgan City).

Are we sure that a 4 is impossible? Grace nearly did it in 24 hours, and the models had higher pressure estimates at landfall than with Ida. Also, even the ICON shows 963...
2 likes   

catskillfire51
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 480
Age: 38
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 5:40 pm
Location: Lake Jackson, TX

Re: ATL: IDA - Models

#824 Postby catskillfire51 » Thu Aug 26, 2021 10:20 pm

NHC adjusted their cone to the west initially as well, instead of going to the east of Grand Cayman it is now going over Grand Cayman.
0 likes   

IcyTundra
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1205
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2021 9:32 pm
Location: Dickinson, Texas

Re: ATL: IDA - Models

#825 Postby IcyTundra » Thu Aug 26, 2021 10:24 pm

0Z ICON landfall is near the Rockefeller Wildlife Refuge east of Grand Chenier 962 MB. Lafayette would get hammered by the NE eyewall if this happened.
0 likes   

Keldeo1997
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 637
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 11:35 pm

Re: ATL: IDA - Models

#826 Postby Keldeo1997 » Thu Aug 26, 2021 10:24 pm

Image

ICON coming in West and much stronger
0 likes   

ThetaE
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 244
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2016 4:50 pm
Location: Boston

Re: ATL: IDA - Models

#827 Postby ThetaE » Thu Aug 26, 2021 10:25 pm

I've seen lots of posts about the NAM today! Definitely a model you should not listen to for TCs. But I don't know if people are really aware of what causes the model to break.

Hurricanes' high winds extract energy from the oceans through evaporation/"heat fluxes," but those high winds also upwell colder waters up to the surface in a self-limiting fashion. The NAM is a regional model that's mostly just simulating weather over land, so having to also model ocean dynamics is an extra complication that in most situations doesn't make sense in terms of computational costs. So the NAM just... takes the SSTs at hour 0 and never changes them. As a result, hurricanes extract WAY more energy than should be physically possible.

Otherwise, in my experience it's a great model for severe and winter weather. And it would handle troughs/ridges well, but TC tracks are very intensity dependent so you really shouldn't trust anything about what it shows.
6 likes   
I'm a busy grad student, not a professional forecaster. Please refer to the NHC and NWS for official forecasts.

User avatar
skyline385
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2728
Age: 35
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:15 pm
Location: Houston TX

Re: ATL: IDA - Models

#828 Postby skyline385 » Thu Aug 26, 2021 10:27 pm

jaguars_22 wrote:Nam shows pressure at 896… omg if that ever happens :)


Burg's recent tweet is very relevant to this thread, please stop everyone

https://twitter.com/burgwx/status/1430997712380391425
3 likes   

User avatar
skyline385
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2728
Age: 35
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:15 pm
Location: Houston TX

Re: ATL: IDA - Models

#829 Postby skyline385 » Thu Aug 26, 2021 10:31 pm

0Z ICON moves away from NOLA as well, and you know its going to be intense when even ICON has it deepening to 962mb before landfall.

Image
0 likes   

ThetaE
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 244
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2016 4:50 pm
Location: Boston

Re: ATL: IDA - Models

#830 Postby ThetaE » Thu Aug 26, 2021 10:34 pm

skyline385 wrote:
jaguars_22 wrote:Nam shows pressure at 896… omg if that ever happens :)


Burg's recent tweet is very relevant to this thread, please stop everyone

https://twitter.com/burgwx/status/1430997712380391425


Ah, I didn't know about the model allowing latent heat fluxes at high RH. That plus the fixed SST problem I mentioned spells disaster for properly modeling surface heat exchanges in TCs. Alicia Bentley is a great source for learning about the nitty-gritty of what makes weather models tick.
0 likes   
I'm a busy grad student, not a professional forecaster. Please refer to the NHC and NWS for official forecasts.

psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4762
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

Re: ATL: IDA - Models

#831 Postby psyclone » Thu Aug 26, 2021 10:34 pm

AxaltaRacing24 wrote:
Steve wrote:
Sciencerocks wrote:

My thinking is for this to be more like a low to mid end cat2 by landfall. I wouldn't be shocked if it got stronger but chances are it won't be a cat4 or 5.


Yeah, I think 4 or 5 are unlikely as well if not impossible. Earlier I guessed 70% at Cat 3. Not sure I'm that high anymore - probably more like 40-45%. But since they sample so much stuff now, they may be able to find at least an extended gust into Cat 3 territory over the Gulf. Glad to see an extreme slowdown is probably off the table too. I'm a wuss and not really ready to make a call like I have for the last 25 years on here or CFHC. But I feel like it will landfall between Slidell and Marsh Island with the zoomed in range of Cocodrie to Centerville/Patterson (just west of Morgan City).

Are we sure that a 4 is impossible? Grace nearly did it in 24 hours, and the models had higher pressure estimates at landfall than with Ida. Also, even the ICON shows 963...


It's probably more pragmatic to focus on a reasonable range (probabilities) instead of high end possibilities. that's how i always try to think. to that end the system is far more likely to end up a 2 or perhaps low end 3 rather than a 4 or a 5. these sorts of details are impossible to resolve at this point and a more sensible solution may not be to talk about some extreme event and instead focus on just how bad a 90-100kt cane can be. That, over one's neighborhood is an extreme event. 8-12" rain, 7-11' surge, triple digit wind gusts, far flung tornadoes... I'd bet on a 90-100kt storm at this point. and that's bad. really bad. For some historical reference, Camille crossed western Cuba as a 100kt cat 3... so it was already a major as it entered the gulf. Of course i know about Michael but for every memorable exceptional event like that there are many others that came up short of that...but were still bad and warrant respect and preparation.
4 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145295
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: IDA - Models

#832 Postby cycloneye » Thu Aug 26, 2021 10:39 pm

skyline385 wrote:0Z ICON moves away from NOLA as well, and you know its going to be intense when even ICON has it deepening to 962mb before landfall.

https://i.imgur.com/dMcjAjG.png


Lower pressure than the 18z run.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5044
Age: 24
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: ATL: IDA - Models

#833 Postby ElectricStorm » Thu Aug 26, 2021 10:47 pm

0z GFS 993mb over W Cuba so far
0 likes   
B.S Meteorology, University of Oklahoma '25

Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

IcyTundra
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1205
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2021 9:32 pm
Location: Dickinson, Texas

Re: ATL: IDA - Models

#834 Postby IcyTundra » Thu Aug 26, 2021 10:51 pm

00Z GFS looks like it is going to be further west than the 18Z run.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: IDA - Models

#835 Postby CrazyC83 » Thu Aug 26, 2021 10:52 pm

At 42 hours, 00Z GFS is about 0.6 degrees south of 18Z GFS.
0 likes   

User avatar
PTrackerLA
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5277
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
Location: Lafayette, LA

Re: ATL: IDA - Models

#836 Postby PTrackerLA » Thu Aug 26, 2021 10:59 pm

Huge shift SW from 18z to 00z on GFS at 66hrs, stronger too

0 likes   

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5044
Age: 24
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: ATL: IDA - Models

#837 Postby ElectricStorm » Thu Aug 26, 2021 11:00 pm

GFS peaks at 953, landfalls at 959
0 likes   
B.S Meteorology, University of Oklahoma '25

Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

IcyTundra
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1205
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2021 9:32 pm
Location: Dickinson, Texas

Re: ATL: IDA - Models

#838 Postby IcyTundra » Thu Aug 26, 2021 11:02 pm

00Z GFS goes right over Houma, LA.
0 likes   

User avatar
ElectricStorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5044
Age: 24
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK

Re: ATL: IDA - Models

#839 Postby ElectricStorm » Thu Aug 26, 2021 11:04 pm

GFS has it deepening at about 1mb/hour in the gulf, and gets it to 953. Any brief period of faster intensification could get it to Cat 4 a similar scenario to this run plays out. Yeah it's not looking good
1 likes   
B.S Meteorology, University of Oklahoma '25

Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2079
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: ATL: IDA - Models

#840 Postby Blinhart » Thu Aug 26, 2021 11:19 pm

So will this be one of those storms that have West bias models at night and East bias models during the day, so got to go with the middle of the 2?
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “2021”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests