ATL: ELSA - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
eastcoastFL
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3901
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
Location: Palm City, FL

Re: ATL: FIVE - Models

#221 Postby eastcoastFL » Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:24 pm

captainbarbossa19 wrote:The GFS is much closer to Jamaica on this run. I wonder if we are about to have more model shifts towards the SW?

https://i.imgur.com/OrziRHE.png


I was just thinking about that because the system is consolidating to the SW so the models will have to adjust for that. It’s forming pretty much how HWRF predicted

Image
5 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
eastcoastFL
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3901
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
Location: Palm City, FL

Re: ATL: FIVE - Models

#222 Postby eastcoastFL » Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:26 pm

captainbarbossa19 wrote:New GFS is more SW with the storm in the Caribbean.


Also ends up crossing extreme western Cuba keeping it more intact entering the gulf.
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Jr0d
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1409
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2019 10:52 am
Location: Cayo Hueso

Re: ATL: FIVE - Models

#223 Postby Jr0d » Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:34 pm

The GFS runs remind me of Charlie's track...not something anyone wants to see again.

Hopefully the model is being overly bullish and the EURO and others got a better grip on the future track and strength.
1 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9620
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: FIVE - Models

#224 Postby Steve » Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:36 pm

Yeah. GFS @ 500mb has got a slightly flatter pattern across the SE. And the slightly lower pressure off SELA is less pronounced. So GFS has 5 coming across Cuba farther west than the last few runs. It turns it north apparently in response to a trough pulling east from Quebec and the maritimes. How far out in the Gulf it will get will likely depend on that feature. This far out, you'd think the most it could do would be to slow it down. Future GFS estimates on the timing of Atlantic high pressure pulses should help clue us in on where and how bad the threat would be as we get closer to 3-4 days.
5 likes   

User avatar
captainbarbossa19
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1092
Age: 27
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2019 11:09 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: FIVE - Models

#225 Postby captainbarbossa19 » Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:36 pm

eastcoastFL wrote:
captainbarbossa19 wrote:The GFS is much closer to Jamaica on this run. I wonder if we are about to have more model shifts towards the SW?

https://i.imgur.com/OrziRHE.png


I was just thinking about that because the system is consolidating to the SW so the models will have to adjust for that. It’s forming pretty much how HWRF predicted

https://cdn.star.nesdis.noaa.gov/FLOATER/data/AL052021/14/GOES16-AL052021-14-1000x1000.gif?hash=27209


Watch the Euro still show this dissipate over Hispaniola. :blowup:
1 likes   

User avatar
StPeteMike
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 631
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2018 11:26 pm

Re: ATL: FIVE - Models

#226 Postby StPeteMike » Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:41 pm

Keeps it way from the mountainous portion of the country. And as we have seen from many storms that cross over the western tip of Cuba…. there’s not that much impact.

Hoping the trough comes in sooner.
1 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9620
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: FIVE - Models

#227 Postby Steve » Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:51 pm

Canadian comes in around Big Cypress/Everglades and moves across Florida coming off around Cape Canaveral. But then it brushes the SC and NC coasts. Although CMC doesn't get it that strong, it does get it better organized as it gains latitude along the southeast coast. That's something that's got my eye for this season already, so even if it's wrong, it's good to see the CMC sniffing that out too.

ICON is weird as it actually favors 95L getting stronger off the Honduran coast and going into Belize then across the BOC toward the Mexican Gulf Coast. 5 struggles from interaction with Hispaniola and gets absorbed into the flow going east. It shows a lot of low pressure around the Mexican Gulf Coast, but that's a downstream result of 5 getting torn up and energy refocusing. I think this is an unlikely solution.

The hurricane models should be running about now.
Last edited by Steve on Thu Jul 01, 2021 12:11 am, edited 3 times in total.
0 likes   

Fancy1001
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 452
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2020 10:16 pm

Re: ATL: FIVE - Models

#228 Postby Fancy1001 » Thu Jul 01, 2021 12:00 am

I'm wondering if we'll see enough West southwest shifts to where it goes below Jamaica before turning North towards the western tip of Cuba.
0 likes   

Shell Mound
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2434
Age: 32
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:39 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL → Scandinavia

Re: ATL: FIVE - Models

#229 Postby Shell Mound » Thu Jul 01, 2021 12:05 am

The past few GFS/HWRF runs went from showing a ~980-mb hurricane in the Lesser Antilles to showing a ~1000-mb system at that time. They’re faster, too.
USTropics wrote:The main difference between the GFS and the ECWMF is short-term intensification/organization, which creates substantial track differences. You can see in the 12z ECMWF and 18z GFS run the differences in as little as 48 hours, with the ECMWF showing a weaker system, and thus gets caught in the faster low-level flow and a much quicker forward speed:

ECMWF
https://i.imgur.com/xJNcvqc.png

GFS
https://i.imgur.com/VXgBp34.png

It's not just the operational suite either, as the ECMWF 12z ensemble members are progressively faster (and weaker) than the GFS ensemble members @ 72 hrs:

ECMWF ensembles
https://i.imgur.com/enGYreQ.png

GFS ensembles
https://i.imgur.com/k6yKUFD.png

Given recent GFS/HWRF runs, I would say that those models are gradually caving to the faster, weaker ECMWF solutions, as is typical. Another win for the ECMWF.
0 likes   
CVW / MiamiensisWx / Shell Mound
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

User avatar
mcheer23
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 436
Age: 32
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 8:24 pm
Location: Sugar Land, Texas

Re: ATL: FIVE - Models

#230 Postby mcheer23 » Thu Jul 01, 2021 12:09 am

Shell Mound wrote:The past few GFS/HWRF runs went from showing a ~980-mb hurricane in the Lesser Antilles to showing a ~1000-mb system at that time. They’re faster, too.
USTropics wrote:The main difference between the GFS and the ECWMF is short-term intensification/organization, which creates substantial track differences. You can see in the 12z ECMWF and 18z GFS run the differences in as little as 48 hours, with the ECMWF showing a weaker system, and thus gets caught in the faster low-level flow and a much quicker forward speed:

ECMWF
https://i.imgur.com/xJNcvqc.png

GFS
https://i.imgur.com/VXgBp34.png

It's not just the operational suite either, as the ECMWF 12z ensemble members are progressively faster (and weaker) than the GFS ensemble members @ 72 hrs:

ECMWF ensembles
https://i.imgur.com/enGYreQ.png

GFS ensembles
https://i.imgur.com/k6yKUFD.png

Given recent GFS/HWRF runs, I would say that those models are gradually caving to the faster, weaker ECMWF solutions, as is typical. Another win for the ECMWF.


You okay…?
11 likes   

Shell Mound
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2434
Age: 32
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:39 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL → Scandinavia

Re: ATL: FIVE - Models

#231 Postby Shell Mound » Thu Jul 01, 2021 12:12 am

mcheer23 wrote:
Shell Mound wrote:The past few GFS/HWRF runs went from showing a ~980-mb hurricane in the Lesser Antilles to showing a ~1000-mb system at that time. They’re faster, too.
USTropics wrote:The main difference between the GFS and the ECWMF is short-term intensification/organization, which creates substantial track differences. You can see in the 12z ECMWF and 18z GFS run the differences in as little as 48 hours, with the ECMWF showing a weaker system, and thus gets caught in the faster low-level flow and a much quicker forward speed:

ECMWF
https://i.imgur.com/xJNcvqc.png

GFS
https://i.imgur.com/VXgBp34.png

It's not just the operational suite either, as the ECMWF 12z ensemble members are progressively faster (and weaker) than the GFS ensemble members @ 72 hrs:

ECMWF ensembles
https://i.imgur.com/enGYreQ.png

GFS ensembles
https://i.imgur.com/k6yKUFD.png

Given recent GFS/HWRF runs, I would say that those models are gradually caving to the faster, weaker ECMWF solutions, as is typical. Another win for the ECMWF.

You okay…?

I was referring to the short term. In the short term (≤72h) the ECMWF is winning in every category aside from depicting genesis properly. GFS/HWRF too deep, slow.
0 likes   
CVW / MiamiensisWx / Shell Mound
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

User avatar
DestinHurricane
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 935
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 8:05 am
Location: New York, NY

Re: ATL: FIVE - Models

#232 Postby DestinHurricane » Thu Jul 01, 2021 12:15 am

Shell Mound wrote:The past few GFS/HWRF runs went from showing a ~980-mb hurricane in the Lesser Antilles to showing a ~1000-mb system at that time. They’re faster, too.
USTropics wrote:The main difference between the GFS and the ECWMF is short-term intensification/organization, which creates substantial track differences. You can see in the 12z ECMWF and 18z GFS run the differences in as little as 48 hours, with the ECMWF showing a weaker system, and thus gets caught in the faster low-level flow and a much quicker forward speed:

ECMWF
https://i.imgur.com/xJNcvqc.png

GFS
https://i.imgur.com/VXgBp34.png

It's not just the operational suite either, as the ECMWF 12z ensemble members are progressively faster (and weaker) than the GFS ensemble members @ 72 hrs:

ECMWF ensembles
https://i.imgur.com/enGYreQ.png

GFS ensembles
https://i.imgur.com/k6yKUFD.png

Given recent GFS/HWRF runs, I would say that those models are gradually caving to the faster, weaker ECMWF solutions, as is typical. Another win for the ECMWF.

The 00Z HWRF is literally the strongest run yet in the lesser Antilles, 983 at 42 hours. The Euro did not show anything until it was force fed, as usual.
6 likes   
Michael 2018

User avatar
StPeteMike
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 631
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2018 11:26 pm

Re: ATL: FIVE - Models

#233 Postby StPeteMike » Thu Jul 01, 2021 12:15 am

The 0z HWRF has a 983-mb by the time it gets to the islands. That’s only 1-mb higher than what the June 30 0z had entering the islands. Don’t think that’s a fair call to say that the storm is a bust…
5 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9620
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: FIVE - Models

#234 Postby Steve » Thu Jul 01, 2021 12:20 am

^^ yeah Destin. HWRF shows it organized. It's moving fast though too which seemed to me to at least be part of why the EC wasn't aggressive. I only like HWRF short term because of the tendency to over intensify. But at 48 hours, you can see it has it at 984mb which is usually hurricane status. 13.9/63.13 @ 7 pm Friday. 2 day Benchmark.
0 likes   

floridasun78
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: miami fl

Re: ATL: FIVE - Models

#235 Postby floridasun78 » Thu Jul 01, 2021 12:25 am

nhc dont see this as hurr their think it stay under 60mph or so as get to cuba
0 likes   

Shell Mound
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2434
Age: 32
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:39 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL → Scandinavia

Re: ATL: FIVE - Models

#236 Postby Shell Mound » Thu Jul 01, 2021 12:33 am

DestinHurricane wrote:
Shell Mound wrote:The past few GFS/HWRF runs went from showing a ~980-mb hurricane in the Lesser Antilles to showing a ~1000-mb system at that time. They’re faster, too.
USTropics wrote:The main difference between the GFS and the ECWMF is short-term intensification/organization, which creates substantial track differences. You can see in the 12z ECMWF and 18z GFS run the differences in as little as 48 hours, with the ECMWF showing a weaker system, and thus gets caught in the faster low-level flow and a much quicker forward speed:

ECMWF
https://i.imgur.com/xJNcvqc.png

GFS
https://i.imgur.com/VXgBp34.png

It's not just the operational suite either, as the ECMWF 12z ensemble members are progressively faster (and weaker) than the GFS ensemble members @ 72 hrs:

ECMWF ensembles
https://i.imgur.com/enGYreQ.png

GFS ensembles
https://i.imgur.com/k6yKUFD.png

Given recent GFS/HWRF runs, I would say that those models are gradually caving to the faster, weaker ECMWF solutions, as is typical. Another win for the ECMWF.

The 00Z HWRF is literally the strongest run yet in the lesser Antilles, 983 at 42 hours. The Euro did not show anything until it was force fed, as usual.

Ah, thank you for clarifying. But the past two GFS runs have trended much weaker in the islands, and current convective trends support the GFS vs. HWRF.
0 likes   
CVW / MiamiensisWx / Shell Mound
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10145
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: FIVE - Models

#237 Postby Blown Away » Thu Jul 01, 2021 12:37 am

00z HWRF...66 hrs Cat 1-2... Slightly N of 18z
3 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
StPeteMike
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 631
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2018 11:26 pm

Re: ATL: FIVE - Models

#238 Postby StPeteMike » Thu Jul 01, 2021 12:38 am

floridasun78 wrote:nhc dont see this as hurr their think it stay under 60mph or so as get to cuba

It’s not that they don’t see Elsa as a hurricane, they do acknowledge their forecast is at the lower end of forecast intensity models and are being somewhat conservative.

They’re mainly waiting for the storm to pass the islands to get a better understanding on if there will be any interaction with the Greater Antilles.
3 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9620
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: FIVE - Models

#239 Postby Steve » Thu Jul 01, 2021 12:38 am

Yeah, HWRF looks to be overdone and will hopefully fail. It has it coming up toward Haiti at 970mb in 75 hours which is like 11pm Saturday night or so.
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10145
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: FIVE - Models

#240 Postby Blown Away » Thu Jul 01, 2021 12:47 am

Steve wrote:Yeah, HWRF looks to be overdone and will hopefully fail. It has it coming up toward Haiti at 970mb in 75 hours which is like 11pm Saturday night or so.


00z HWRF... 87 hrs, full degree N of 18z... Clips Haiti, Moving NW into SE Cuba, 96 mph winds... Gonna ride the Cuba spine on this run...
1 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…


Return to “2021”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests