ATL: ETA - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Ryxn
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 314
Age: 25
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:50 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2281 Postby Ryxn » Tue Nov 03, 2020 1:05 am

Forecast to attain Category 5 status at 7:00 AM EST. Although clouds tops are starting to look warmer on infrared. I think this was no double a 160 mph+ hurricane earlier tonight.
0 likes   

User avatar
Owasso
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 309
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 11:14 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion: 7 PM EST = 150 mph

#2282 Postby Owasso » Tue Nov 03, 2020 1:08 am

UW - CIMSS
ADVANCED DVORAK TECHNIQUE
ADT-Version 9.0
Tropical Cyclone Intensity Algorithm

----- Current Analysis -----
Date : 03 NOV 2020 Time : 052017 UTC
Lat : 14:00:00 N Lon : 82:49:48 W


CI# /Pressure/ Vmax
6.9 / 926.4mb/137.4kt


Final T# Adj T# Raw T#
6.9 7.3 7.8

Estimated radius of max. wind based on IR : 7 km

Center Temp : -3.0C Cloud Region Temp : -78.6C

Scene Type : EYE

Subtropical Adjustment : OFF

Extratropical Adjustment : OFF

Positioning Method : ARCHER POSITIONING


Up to 6.9, Adjusted is 7.3, Raw drops to 7.8
0 likes   

underthwx
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2363
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 2:14 pm
Location: Brazoria County Texas

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2283 Postby underthwx » Tue Nov 03, 2020 1:11 am

I'm thinking it may remain a high end Category 4...with the cyclone nearing landfall...and the high terrain....but it will be close...
0 likes   

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2284 Postby Frank2 » Tue Nov 03, 2020 1:14 am

Can't fault recon - they don't want to fly into a Cat 4 or 5 at night with faulty equipment. I think the Hugo experience in 1989 left it's mark, when NOAA 43 (or was it 42) almost went down after losing 2 engines in the eye - and that was in the middle of the day.

The other issue is both NOAA and DoD have used up a lot of flight hours this year. Fiscal FY-21 began on October 1 so the current very active season is now taking funds from next seasons flight hours.

Still, above all it's safety first...

Frank
4 likes   

User avatar
Owasso
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 309
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 11:14 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2285 Postby Owasso » Tue Nov 03, 2020 1:20 am

Image
ADT has a C5.
1 likes   

User avatar
Extratropical94
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3538
Age: 30
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:36 am
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Contact:

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2286 Postby Extratropical94 » Tue Nov 03, 2020 1:21 am

It's becoming less likely that we'll see 140 kts at 4am EST.

TXNT22 KNES 030542
TCSNTL

A. 29L (ETA)

B. 03/0530Z

C. 14.0N

D. 82.8W

E. ONE/GOES-E

F. T6.5/6.5

G. IR/EIR/SWIR

H. REMARKS...OW EYE SURROUNDED BY CMG AND EMBEDDED IN WHITE YIELDS A DT
OF 6.5 AFTER AN EYE ADJUSTMENT OF +0.5. MET IS EQUAL TO 5.5 AND PT IS
EQUAL TO 6.0 BASED ON RAPID DEVELOPMENT TREND IN LAST 24H. FT IS BASED
ON DT.

I. ADDL POSITIONS

NIL


...TUGGLE
0 likes   
54° 11' 59'' N, 9° 9' 20'' E
Boomer Sooner!
Go Broncos! Go Cards! Go Niners!
- Daniel

User avatar
Ryxn
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 314
Age: 25
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:50 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2287 Postby Ryxn » Tue Nov 03, 2020 1:22 am

Do you think we could get a CAT 5 at 4 or 7 AM EST?
0 likes   

User avatar
skyline385
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2728
Age: 35
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:15 pm
Location: Houston TX

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2288 Postby skyline385 » Tue Nov 03, 2020 1:27 am

On another note, the latest GFS has Eta headed towards LA
1 likes   

underthwx
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2363
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 2:14 pm
Location: Brazoria County Texas

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2289 Postby underthwx » Tue Nov 03, 2020 1:33 am

skyline385 wrote:On another note, the latest GFS has Eta headed towards LA


Perish the thought....
0 likes   

euro6208

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2290 Postby euro6208 » Tue Nov 03, 2020 1:34 am

TyphoonNara wrote:
Hayabusa wrote:Wow I don't really watch hurricanes unless they are really strong and this one got raw 8s and above on multiple fixes :double:
If this was in the WPAC the highest delta here would be probably give about a raw of 7.7.
2020NOV03 005017 6.2 942.1 119.8 6.2 6.3 8.1 1.3T/6hr OFF OFF OFF OFF -6.22 -80.40 EYE 7 IR 20.0 14.22 82.52 ARCHER GOES16 18.7
2020NOV03 012017 6.3 940.0 122.2 6.3 6.4 8.2 1.3T/6hr OFF OFF OFF OFF -9.20 -81.43 EYE 7 IR 20.0 14.19 82.54 ARCHER GOES16 18.7
2020NOV03 015017 6.3 940.0 122.2 6.3 6.3 8.3 1.3T/6hr OFF OFF OFF OFF -9.98 -81.80 EYE 7 IR 20.0 14.17 82.56 ARCHER GOES16 18.7
2020NOV03 022017 6.3 940.1 122.2 6.3 6.3 8.4 1.3T/6hr OFF OFF OFF OFF 3.37 -81.52 EYE 7 IR 20.0 14.12 82.60 ARCHER GOES16 18.6
2020NOV03 025017 6.3 940.1 122.2 6.3 6.5 8.4 1.3T/6hr OFF OFF OFF OFF 10.53 -81.37 EYE 8 IR 20.0 14.08 82.61 ARCHER GOES16 18.6
2020NOV03 032017 6.4 938.0 124.6 6.4 6.7 8.4 1.3T/6hr OFF OFF OFF OFF 7.28 -81.52 EYE 8 IR 20.0 14.08 82.65 ARCHER GOES16 18.6
2020NOV03 035017 6.4 938.0 124.6 6.4 6.9 8.3 1.3T/6hr OFF OFF OFF OFF 3.76 -81.05 EYE 8 IR 20.0 14.09 82.68 ARCHER GOES16 18.6
2020NOV03 042017 6.6 933.5 129.6 6.6 7.1 8.3 1.3T/6hr OFF OFF OFF OFF 9.55 -80.20 EYE 8 IR 20.0 14.09 82.71 ARCHER GOES16 18.7
2020NOV03 045018 6.7 931.2 132.2 6.7 7.2 8.1 1.3T/6hr OFF OFF OFF OFF 5.22 -79.46 EYE 7 IR 20.0 14.02 82.77 ARCHER GOES16 18.6


I think ADT have different algorithms for storms in the Eastern and Western hemisphere. I remember seeing storms passing the international date line and then its ADT immediately drops by 0.5. This is questionable in my opinion though.

A rawT# of 7.7 if Eta is in WPac seems about to be right.


That's true. A study was done on this. ADT yields different numbers for the eastern (lower) and western hemisphere (higher) for the same system.
Last edited by euro6208 on Tue Nov 03, 2020 1:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

euro6208

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2291 Postby euro6208 » Tue Nov 03, 2020 1:35 am

Really unfortunate recon was cancelled.
1 likes   

User avatar
Ryxn
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 314
Age: 25
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:50 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2292 Postby Ryxn » Tue Nov 03, 2020 1:43 am

There will be NO more recon missions before landfall? Storm looks to be waning on infrared satellite.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ryxn
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 314
Age: 25
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:50 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2293 Postby Ryxn » Tue Nov 03, 2020 1:57 am

Category 5 will likely have to wait for post-season...let's see the wind reports from Nicaragua.
0 likes   

euro6208

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2294 Postby euro6208 » Tue Nov 03, 2020 1:59 am

Truly a catastrophic hurricane at landfall no matter what category.
0 likes   

underthwx
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2363
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 2:14 pm
Location: Brazoria County Texas

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2295 Postby underthwx » Tue Nov 03, 2020 2:00 am

ETA inching closer to landfall...
0 likes   

Chris90
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 646
Age: 35
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2017 9:36 pm

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2296 Postby Chris90 » Tue Nov 03, 2020 2:01 am

I wonder if that 2nd mission this evening was cancelled due to safety concerns. The last VDM from the last mission that made it into the storm made specific note of "MANY MESOVORTICES ROTATING ON INSIDE EYEWALL."

They have to avoid the mesovortices for safety, because mesovortices can cause an aircraft crisis, as it was considered a good possibility that a meso was responsible for what happened on that fateful Hugo flight.

If you're trying to hit the center of a pinhole eye while avoiding numerous mesovortices rotating around, that seems like a really big risk. Maybe they said it was too risky and cancelled.
0 likes   
Solar Aquarian
Lunar Cancerian
:uarrow: Sagittarian

lando
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 196
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 11:44 am
Location: Tampa

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2297 Postby lando » Tue Nov 03, 2020 2:02 am

0z Euro with a deep hurricane in the central gulf heading E at the end of the run..
0 likes   

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2589
Age: 26
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2298 Postby kevin » Tue Nov 03, 2020 2:03 am

Considering final T# are now up to 7.2 and the fact that the NHC themselves is already forecasting a cat 5 at landfall (and it's rare for them to go below their own forecasts for strong storms), I'm fairly confident that this will be a cat 5 in the next advisory.
Last edited by kevin on Tue Nov 03, 2020 2:08 am, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
kevin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2589
Age: 26
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:35 am

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2299 Postby kevin » Tue Nov 03, 2020 2:05 am

Even if the NHC wants to play it safe and go slightly below ADT you'd still have a 140 kts cat 5 system.

Current Intensity Analysis



UW - CIMSS
ADVANCED DVORAK TECHNIQUE
ADT-Version 9.0
Tropical Cyclone Intensity Algorithm

----- Current Analysis -----
Date : 03 NOV 2020 Time : 062017 UTC
Lat : 13:58:12 N Lon : 82:54:00 W


CI# /Pressure/ Vmax
7.2 / 919.3mb/146.0kt


Final T# Adj T# Raw T#
7.2 7.5 7.6
0 likes   

User avatar
skyline385
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2728
Age: 35
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:15 pm
Location: Houston TX

Re: ATL: ETA - Hurricane - Discussion

#2300 Postby skyline385 » Tue Nov 03, 2020 2:07 am

Chris90 wrote:I wonder if that 2nd mission this evening was cancelled due to safety concerns. The last VDM from the last mission that made it into the storm made specific note of "MANY MESOVORTICES ROTATING ON INSIDE EYEWALL."

They have to avoid the mesovortices for safety, because mesovortices can cause an aircraft crisis, as it was considered a good possibility that a meso was responsible for what happened on that fateful Hugo flight.

If you're trying to hit the center of a pinhole eye while avoiding numerous mesovortices rotating around, that seems like a really big risk. Maybe they said it was too risky and cancelled.


This is a good point, and to support it look at what happened to AF304's altitude when it made the first pass

Image
0 likes   


Return to “2020”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests