ATL: DELTA - Post-Tropical - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion
Big meso popping on the north eyewall. When that big eye clears out it will look pretty impressive with a large hurricane force windfield.
2 likes
Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion
I hope people were not thrown off guard with this collapsing in the W Carb and then dismissing what may happen in the GoM.
It is particularly significant the latest changes COAMPS is showing for lack of dry-air entrainment and a surge in energy transfer from the water.
If AMSU confirms with a deeper cold-pool reading then IMHO a low-grade Cat 4 is probably an even shot at landfall.
If CAPE gets to the 6000 level, then could be even more.
Stay tuned.
It is particularly significant the latest changes COAMPS is showing for lack of dry-air entrainment and a surge in energy transfer from the water.
If AMSU confirms with a deeper cold-pool reading then IMHO a low-grade Cat 4 is probably an even shot at landfall.
If CAPE gets to the 6000 level, then could be even more.
Stay tuned.
3 likes
- Kazmit
- Category 5
- Posts: 2124
- Age: 22
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:49 am
- Location: Williamsburg, VA / Bermuda
Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion
GCANE wrote:I hope people were not thrown off guard with this collapsing in the W Carb and then dismissing what may happen in the GoM.
It is particularly significant the latest changes COAMPS is showing for lack of dry-air entrainment and a surge in energy transfer from the water.
If AMSU confirms with a deeper cold-pool reading then IMHO a low-grade Cat 4 is probably an even shot at landfall.
If CAPE gets to the 6000 level, then could be even more.
Stay tuned.
Landfall as a cat 4? Would that be its peak or would it peak beforehand and weaken up to landfall?
0 likes
Igor 2010, Sandy 2012, Fay 2014, Gonzalo 2014, Joaquin 2015, Nicole 2016, Humberto 2019
I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion
GCANE wrote:I hope people were not thrown off guard with this collapsing in the W Carb and then dismissing what may happen in the GoM.
It is particularly significant the latest changes COAMPS is showing for lack of dry-air entrainment and a surge in energy transfer from the water.
If AMSU confirms with a deeper cold-pool reading then IMHO a low-grade Cat 4 is probably an even shot at landfall.
If CAPE gets to the 6000 level, then could be even more.
Stay tuned.
What is the coamps never heard of it
0 likes
Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion
stormlover2013 wrote:GCANE wrote:Latest COAMPS run showing that this may not weaken as much as previously forecast on approach.
A big surge now in Enthalpy Flux and no Dry-Air entrainment into the core.
https://i.imgur.com/5fzz9cX.gif
https://i.imgur.com/Paz4Tjr.gif
What is the coamps?
Its the model developed in conjunction with the Navy Research Lab.
It incorporates synoptic and mesoscale states.
From what I understand some of the predominant hurricane researchers had a significant hand in its development.
3 likes
Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion
GCANE wrote:stormlover2013 wrote:GCANE wrote:Latest COAMPS run showing that this may not weaken as much as previously forecast on approach.
A big surge now in Enthalpy Flux and no Dry-Air entrainment into the core.
https://i.imgur.com/5fzz9cX.gif
Oh k thanks, where does it show it making landfall
https://i.imgur.com/Paz4Tjr.gif
What is the coamps?
Its the model developed in conjunction with the Navy Research Lab.
It incorporates synoptic and mesoscale states.
From what I understand some of the predominant hurricane researchers had a significant hand in its development.
0 likes
Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion
Salute!
Think Audrey. Do not get complacent.
Gums sends...
Think Audrey. Do not get complacent.
Gums sends...
4 likes
Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion
1:00 PM CDT Thu Oct 8
Location: 24.4°N 93.1°W
Moving: NW at 13 mph
Min pressure: 966 mb
Max sustained: 105 mph
Location: 24.4°N 93.1°W
Moving: NW at 13 mph
Min pressure: 966 mb
Max sustained: 105 mph
0 likes
Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion
Beef Stew wrote:1:00 PM CDT Thu Oct 8
Location: 24.4°N 93.1°W
Moving: NW at 13 mph
Min pressure: 966 mb
Max sustained: 105 mph
Really shocked they didn't up it to 110 MPH at least.
3 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion
Kazmit wrote:GCANE wrote:I hope people were not thrown off guard with this collapsing in the W Carb and then dismissing what may happen in the GoM.
It is particularly significant the latest changes COAMPS is showing for lack of dry-air entrainment and a surge in energy transfer from the water.
If AMSU confirms with a deeper cold-pool reading then IMHO a low-grade Cat 4 is probably an even shot at landfall.
If CAPE gets to the 6000 level, then could be even more.
Stay tuned.
Landfall as a cat 4? Would that be its peak or would it peak beforehand and weaken up to landfall?
The energy inputs appear to peak out a few hours before landfall, however there is a lag in winds.
Temporal and spatial resolution is not fine enough to tell precisely from COAMPS.
But my educated guess is that surface pressure may increase a bit at landfall but the winds may peak at landfall.
0 likes
Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion
Blinhart wrote:Beef Stew wrote:1:00 PM CDT Thu Oct 8
Location: 24.4°N 93.1°W
Moving: NW at 13 mph
Min pressure: 966 mb
Max sustained: 105 mph
Really shocked they didn't up it to 110 MPH at least.
Likewise. Recon appeared to be suggesting an intensity of between 90 and 95 kts at the least, and I thought that they would go with the latter for this advisory.
0 likes
- ElectricStorm
- Category 5
- Posts: 5044
- Age: 24
- Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:23 pm
- Location: Skiatook, OK / Norman, OK
Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion
Blinhart wrote:Beef Stew wrote:1:00 PM CDT Thu Oct 8
Location: 24.4°N 93.1°W
Moving: NW at 13 mph
Min pressure: 966 mb
Max sustained: 105 mph
Really shocked they didn't up it to 110 MPH at least.
Not much evidence of anything higher right now.
1 likes
B.S Meteorology, University of Oklahoma '25
Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.
Please refer to the NHC, NWS, or SPC for official information.
Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion
Delta is firing off another tall hot tower in the N quadrant. Just when you think it can’t produce any deeper convection.
3 likes
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
- Texashawk
- Category 2
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:50 am
- Location: Missouri City, TX (Houston)
Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion
Looking at the 1 PM update, it looks like Delta needs to start moving almost due north right now to make the forecast track, and I just don’t see that happening yet. If the storm crosses 94 degrees west without a significant northward component, should Beaumont/PA/Orange start to worry?
2 likes
Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion
Weather Dude wrote:Blinhart wrote:Beef Stew wrote:1:00 PM CDT Thu Oct 8
Location: 24.4°N 93.1°W
Moving: NW at 13 mph
Min pressure: 966 mb
Max sustained: 105 mph
Really shocked they didn't up it to 110 MPH at least.
Not much evidence of anything higher right now.
I think there was enough evidence, as do many others. Got gas cans for family members that have a generator for after the storm. Got plenty of sand bags to hopefully secure the house. Got everything else done, luckily there wasn't much I had to do since Laura.
3 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- Kazmit
- Category 5
- Posts: 2124
- Age: 22
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:49 am
- Location: Williamsburg, VA / Bermuda
Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion
Both planes are heading out now. When is the next mission scheduled?
0 likes
Igor 2010, Sandy 2012, Fay 2014, Gonzalo 2014, Joaquin 2015, Nicole 2016, Humberto 2019
I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion
COAMPS can be weird though. A lot like the UKMET, sometimes it's way too far east or way too far west compared to the NHC track. However, sometimes it's pretty good. Sally near Mobile County was a recent success. You can always find it (beside the Navy site) as the "experimental track" on Ral's Early/Late Cycle Guidance plots
http://hurricanes.ral.ucar.edu/realtime ... ream15.png
http://hurricanes.ral.ucar.edu/realtime ... ream15.png
2 likes
Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion
Texashawk wrote:Looking at the 1 PM update, it looks like Delta needs to start moving almost due north right now to make the forecast track, and I just don’t see that happening yet. If the storm crosses 94 degrees west without a significant northward component, should Beaumont/PA/Orange start to worry?
Please listen to your officials and the NHC over me, they have way more experience and better data at their disposal. But I'm inclined to agree that if it continues this path west and crosses 94W it can indeed become a more significant threat to Beaumont/PA/Orange. Nothing set in stone yet, but I'd recommend everyone in that area to at least prepare for a possible escape plan.
Last edited by kevin on Thu Oct 08, 2020 1:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes
-
- Category 4
- Posts: 998
- Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2018 5:29 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion
Texashawk wrote:Looking at the 1 PM update, it looks like Delta needs to start moving almost due north right now to make the forecast track, and I just don’t see that happening yet. If the storm crosses 94 degrees west without a significant northward component, should Beaumont/PA/Orange start to worry?
It should start to curve back to east of due north before landfall. That means it will be coming in at a different angle than Laura, which was pretty much due north to NNNW. That means if it bulls-eyes on Cameron/Calcasieu Lake again, the surge into Lake Charles proper could be worse (than with Laura).
2 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests