ATL: DELTA - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Stormgodess
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 301
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2020 1:31 am

Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1721 Postby Stormgodess » Wed Oct 07, 2020 3:54 pm

LARanger wrote:
Stormgodess wrote: I feel like I cant really count on the predictions. I really hate saying that, and I know overall accuracy has gotten so much better. But that is just how it "Feels"??? :cry:


You're not wrong. Especially in the BR/Hammond area which I believe we share, basically every hurricane that's struck the northern gulf has, at one point or another, had a forecast track pointed at our area . . . sometimes two at the same time, criss-crossed . . . only to see it actually hit the other side of the state, or even another state, entirely. It's like the BR/NO area is the "default target".

Even as Delta models trend more westward (itself 2020's trend), the accuracy issues keep me up at night since, eventually, one's luck runs out.


Yeh the exact point Marco and Laura tracks converged at one time was directly over my house! And so far we have been blessed. I just came across this on Twitter though, of what Lake Charles looks like today. Can you imagine what is going to happen to that debris if they got another direct hit! It makes me almost hope it moves more our way, because the thought of those poor people facing this right now breaks my heart!

 https://twitter.com/KCourvellWHIO/status/1313900083730096128




https://twitter.com/KCourvellWHIO/statu ... 96128?s=20
2 likes   

User avatar
tiger_deF
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 468
Age: 24
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2016 11:47 am

Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1722 Postby tiger_deF » Wed Oct 07, 2020 3:55 pm

The virgin chad pre-Yucatan Delta vs the chad virgin Gulf Delta
4 likes   

edu2703
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 349
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2018 7:15 pm

Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1723 Postby edu2703 » Wed Oct 07, 2020 3:55 pm

Forecast peak reduced to 100 kts in 36 hours, followed by a weakening before landfall.
3 likes   

al78
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 332
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2018 12:20 pm

Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1724 Postby al78 » Wed Oct 07, 2020 3:58 pm

Looks like the Yucatan knocked it down more than expected, 75 kts now, which may mean it is a category lower when it comes ashore in Louisiana. May end up not as bad as initially expected, but it depends on how much the core has been disrupted by the land interaction and whatever it was that caused the core to fall apart just before landfall, and whether or not it can reorganise quickly. I remember Georges in 1998 failed to gain much intensity over the Gulf after it came off Cuba but the Yucatan is flatter than Cuba. Time will tell. Looking like it will still come ashore as a hurricane so should still be taken seriously.
1 likes   

Jag95
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 438
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 8:43 pm
Location: Mobile, AL

Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1725 Postby Jag95 » Wed Oct 07, 2020 4:02 pm

texsn95 wrote:Sure looks to have an almost due West motion at the moment.


Didn't the models show this a couple of days ago, possibly due to effects of Gamma? Only problem is, I don't see a Gamma.
2 likes   

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1726 Postby supercane4867 » Wed Oct 07, 2020 4:10 pm

al78 wrote:Looks like the Yucatan knocked it down more than expected, 75 kts now, which may mean it is a category lower when it comes ashore in Louisiana. May end up not as bad as initially expected, but it depends on how much the core has been disrupted by the land interaction and whatever it was that caused the core to fall apart just before landfall, and whether or not it can reorganise quickly. I remember Georges in 1998 failed to gain much intensity over the Gulf after it came off Cuba but the Yucatan is flatter than Cuba. Time will tell. Looking like it will still come ashore as a hurricane so should still be taken seriously.

Actually quite the contrary. The effects of interaction with Yucatan is less than expected for a landfalling hurricane. Had it came ashore with a pinhole eye as what it once appeared to be, the small inner core would completely vanish over Yucatan resulting in a much looser structure. Recent microwave suggests this is obviously not the case due to the fact that it struggled with wind shear in the Caribbean. Land interaction only helped its re-organization process if anything.
4 likes   

TheStormExpert

Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1727 Postby TheStormExpert » Wed Oct 07, 2020 4:17 pm

I’m starting to doubt Delta becomes a major again. It currently is still dealing with southerly wind shear especially in the mid-levels. And shear only looks to slowly increase as it tracks north.
0 likes   

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2081
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1728 Postby Blinhart » Wed Oct 07, 2020 4:21 pm

TheStormExpert wrote:I’m starting to doubt Delta becomes a major again. It currently is still dealing with southerly wind shear especially in the mid-levels. And shear only looks to slowly increase as it tracks north.



I'm sorry, but where do you see shear??? No one is mentioning any shear anywhere. Everyone is saying the shear is suppose to be almost nothing until right when it starts turning N/NNE, and then they don't know if the upper air wind might actually help it vent and gain some strength.
2 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
mpic
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 622
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 11:24 am
Location: Splendora, TX

Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1729 Postby mpic » Wed Oct 07, 2020 4:21 pm

Stormgodess wrote:Yeh the exact point Marco and Laura tracks converged at one time was directly over my house! And so far we have been blessed. I just came across this on Twitter though, of what Lake Charles looks like today. Can you imagine what is going to happen to that debris if they got another direct hit! It makes me almost hope it moves more our way, because the thought of those poor people facing this right now breaks my heart!

https://twitter.com/KCourvellWHIO/status/1313900083730096128?s=20

https://twitter.com/KCourvellWHIO/statu ... 96128?s=20


Stark reminder of Dickinson, Tx after Ike in 2008
3 likes   
Alicia, Rita, Ike, Harvey and Beryl...moved to Splendora lol

al78
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 332
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2018 12:20 pm

Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1730 Postby al78 » Wed Oct 07, 2020 4:23 pm

supercane4867 wrote:
al78 wrote:Looks like the Yucatan knocked it down more than expected, 75 kts now, which may mean it is a category lower when it comes ashore in Louisiana. May end up not as bad as initially expected, but it depends on how much the core has been disrupted by the land interaction and whatever it was that caused the core to fall apart just before landfall, and whether or not it can reorganise quickly. I remember Georges in 1998 failed to gain much intensity over the Gulf after it came off Cuba but the Yucatan is flatter than Cuba. Time will tell. Looking like it will still come ashore as a hurricane so should still be taken seriously.

Actually quite the contrary. The effects of interaction with Yucatan is less than expected for a landfalling hurricane. Had it came ashore with a pinhole eye as what it once appeared to be, the small inner core would completely vanish over Yucatan resulting in a much looser structure. Recent microwave suggests this is obviously not the case due to the fact that it struggled with wind shear in the Caribbean. Land interaction only helped its re-organization process if anything.


Interesting. If land interaction assisted its re-organisation, why the drop in intensity by two categories, when it was forecast to stay at least mid range category two during it land crossing? Gilbert didn't weaken below cat 2 when crossing the Yucatan and that had an overland track that was further away from water, although that was cat five at landfall.
0 likes   

User avatar
aspen
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8818
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA

Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1731 Postby aspen » Wed Oct 07, 2020 4:24 pm

This microwave pass is 7 hours old, but it shows that Delta has or at least had a new, large eyewall forming.
Image
There’s also a new hot tower firing on the other side of the CoC, a sign that continued eyewall building may be happening.
2 likes   
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21

I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.

User avatar
ColdMiser123
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 904
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:26 pm
Location: Northeast US

Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1732 Postby ColdMiser123 » Wed Oct 07, 2020 4:25 pm

Blinhart wrote:
TheStormExpert wrote:I’m starting to doubt Delta becomes a major again. It currently is still dealing with southerly wind shear especially in the mid-levels. And shear only looks to slowly increase as it tracks north.



I'm sorry, but where do you see shear??? No one is mentioning any shear anywhere. Everyone is saying the shear is suppose to be almost nothing until right when it starts turning N/NNE, and then they don't know if the upper air wind might actually help it vent and gain some strength.


Mid level shear will be <10 kt for the next 24-30 hours, and only increases to >15 kt a few hours before landfall. Not too much preventing this from intensifying currently, and how strong it gets now will be key for how strong it remains with landfall Friday afternoon-evening.
4 likes   
B.S., M.S., Meteorology & Atmospheric Science

User avatar
mpic
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 622
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 11:24 am
Location: Splendora, TX

Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1733 Postby mpic » Wed Oct 07, 2020 4:28 pm

As far as people not being on the forum, I am making last preparations to leave even though I'm outside the cone. 2020 has been too unpredictable in every way and I don't want to be caught unprepared. Mobile homes and hurricanes don't mix and I'll have 7 dogs in tow.
9 likes   
Alicia, Rita, Ike, Harvey and Beryl...moved to Splendora lol

User avatar
tarheelprogrammer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)

Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1734 Postby tarheelprogrammer » Wed Oct 07, 2020 4:28 pm

ColdMiser123 wrote:
Blinhart wrote:
TheStormExpert wrote:I’m starting to doubt Delta becomes a major again. It currently is still dealing with southerly wind shear especially in the mid-levels. And shear only looks to slowly increase as it tracks north.



I'm sorry, but where do you see shear??? No one is mentioning any shear anywhere. Everyone is saying the shear is suppose to be almost nothing until right when it starts turning N/NNE, and then they don't know if the upper air wind might actually help it vent and gain some strength.


Mid level shear will be <10 kt for the next 24-30 hours, and only increases to >15 kt a few hours before landfall. Not too much preventing this from intensifying currently, and how strong it gets now will be key for how strong it remains with landfall Friday afternoon-evening.


Agreed, and please do not downplay this one people. A storm of this size at category 2 is going to produce a large storm surge. Plus, it is hitting an already devastated area of LA/TX. :cry:
2 likes   
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

TheStormExpert

Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1735 Postby TheStormExpert » Wed Oct 07, 2020 4:28 pm

ColdMiser123 wrote:
Blinhart wrote:
TheStormExpert wrote:I’m starting to doubt Delta becomes a major again. It currently is still dealing with southerly wind shear especially in the mid-levels. And shear only looks to slowly increase as it tracks north.



I'm sorry, but where do you see shear??? No one is mentioning any shear anywhere. Everyone is saying the shear is suppose to be almost nothing until right when it starts turning N/NNE, and then they don't know if the upper air wind might actually help it vent and gain some strength.


Mid level shear will be <10 kt for the next 24-30 hours, and only increases to >15 kt a few hours before landfall. Not too much preventing this from intensifying currently, and how strong it gets now will be key for how strong it remains with landfall Friday afternoon-evening.

Well we better hope that shear and mid-level shear increases before landfall as SW Louisiana doesn’t need yet another major hurricane threat just over a month after the last!
2 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1736 Postby CrazyC83 » Wed Oct 07, 2020 4:30 pm

A very large, low to mid-category hurricane can have very significant impact too. Ike was a category 2 yet did about $30 billion in damage with storm surges up to 20 feet.
3 likes   

Sailingtime
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2019 7:02 pm

Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1737 Postby Sailingtime » Wed Oct 07, 2020 4:30 pm

edu2703 wrote:Forecast peak reduced to 100 kts in 36 hours, followed by a weakening before landfall.


Good news indeed. While it will still be a nasty storm to contend with at least it won't be a major.
0 likes   

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2081
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1738 Postby Blinhart » Wed Oct 07, 2020 4:32 pm

Sailingtime wrote:
edu2703 wrote:Forecast peak reduced to 100 kts in 36 hours, followed by a weakening before landfall.


Good news indeed. While it will still be a nasty storm to contend with at least it won't be a major.


I think they are underestimating how much fuel is out there. I think it still has a chance of getting up to at least 115 Knots.
3 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
DestinHurricane
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 935
Joined: Tue May 01, 2018 8:05 am
Location: New York, NY

Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1739 Postby DestinHurricane » Wed Oct 07, 2020 4:32 pm

Sailingtime wrote:
edu2703 wrote:Forecast peak reduced to 100 kts in 36 hours, followed by a weakening before landfall.


Good news indeed. While it will still be a nasty storm to contend with at least it won't be a major.

It can still be a major.
7 likes   
Michael 2018

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: DELTA - Hurricane - Discussion

#1740 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Oct 07, 2020 4:34 pm

I would not hang my hat on any of the intensity
forecasts as we know so far that has not worked
well with Delta or any of the storms this season.
4 likes   


Return to “2020”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests