This morning's visible imagery indicates that 96L may be close to weakening to a tropical wave. Satellite structure is more indicative of a very large wave than a closed low (see image below). Quickscat winds show 25-30 kts north of the weak low center, but now only 5-10 kts to the south. I'm seeing less strato-cu streaming into the low in the south half. Clearly this low is NOT strengthening at all - good news for Florida. Strongest convection is now about 100-150 miles west of the broad area of low pressure. It's evident that strong easterly shear around the base of the mid-level ridge is having an adverse effect on the low.
These squalls will move into southeast Florida late this afternoon, probably producing 2-5" of rain in some areas. Winds of 15-30 kts can be expected along the beaches, decreasing to 12-20 kts inland. So Florida will see just a little bit of rain and some gusty wind.
As for its future, since it hasn't become any better organized in the past 2 days, the chances of it doing anything in the Gulf are diminishing. I still think that it'll eventually be called an STD by the NHC, but it's losing upper-level support (necessary for a cold core low to develop/maintain itself) and showing no signs of developing convection near the center (necessary if it will "go tropical"). That's why winds north of the low are down 5-10 kts from yesterday. But will it become a TS or STS in the GUlf? I'm now leaning more against that possibility. I'd give it a chance of being called a minimal STS or TS in the Gulf, but not a good chance any more. But then, the NHC called Nicholas a TS for 3 days after it weakened below TS strength, so who knows what they'll do.
One other note - Monterrey is now referring to this as "Invest 96L" as opposed to "Nicholas" now.
<img src="http://home.houston.rr.com/wx/disturb.gif">
96L Weakening as it Nears Bahamas
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- stormchazer
- Category 5
- Posts: 2462
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 12:00 pm
- Location: Lakeland, Florida
- Contact:
wxman57 wrote:Josephine96 wrote:Darn thing better not be weakening.. Too much hype for it to weaken so suddenly.
.
Correct -- "too much hype". I think this may be a decoy. Look south in the Caribbean at the very strong disturbance. THAT may be something to watch, as it is purely tropical.
You answered a question on my mind. I originally thought this was energy involved with 96L. Isn't shear an issue right now with this disturbance?
0 likes
The posts or stuff said are NOT an official forecast and my opinion alone. Please look to the NHC and NWS for official forecasts and products.
Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)
TCVN is a weighted averaged
Opinions my own.
Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)
TCVN is a weighted averaged
Opinions my own.
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 23010
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
stormchazer wrote:You answered a question on my mind. I originally thought this was energy involved with 96L. Isn't shear an issue right now with this disturbance?
Yep, the S-SW wind shear over the Caribbean disturbance is pretty high now. It's actually being hit hard by the circulation associated with the upper-low over 96L. So definitely no development for a few days. The upper low will have to weaken and move off to the west maybe around mid week.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: 869MB, cheezyWXguy, Datsaintsfan09, duilaslol, LAF92, MetroMike, quaqualita, SFLcane, skillz305, Ulf, wzrgirl1 and 92 guests