cfisher wrote:LSU2001 wrote:cfisher wrote:It's a balance. OTOH being *too* bullish can make people take future storms less serious, but OTOH you don't have to go back very far in history to see what happens with storms in this position. This site and NHC were way too bearish on Laura, but thankfully it impacted a sparsely populated zone.
edit: also we KNOW lightning near the core is a harbringer of RI. There's no need to patronize people for making predictions based on historical data.
Maybe compared to NOLA or Houston you could say Laura hit a “sparsely populated area” but I assure you here in Louisiana Laura caused massive damage all the way up the southwestern side of La. and all the way up to Monroe. Hundreds of thousands of people were directly impacted as she rode up the state.
It's certainly not unreasonable to say Laura made landfall in an unpopulated area.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ed/Louisiana_population_map.png
The whole state of Louisiana is just over 4 million people and Houston has that by itself, so you could say the whole state is sparsely populated, still doesn't mean it didn't effect a lot of people and cost 10's of billions of dollars in damage.