
ATL: NANA - Remnants - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL: SIXTEEN - Potential Tropical Cyclone - Discussion

2 likes
Very useful information on the Dvorak Technique --
https://severe.worldweather.wmo.int/TCF ... kBeven.pdf
https://severe.worldweather.wmo.int/TCF ... kBeven.pdf
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: SIXTEEN - Potential Tropical Cyclone - Discussion
annndd drum roll please..
here is ASCAT.
very likely would not be upgraded from this mess..

here is ASCAT.
very likely would not be upgraded from this mess..

6 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
-
- Category 4
- Posts: 998
- Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2018 5:29 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
Re: ATL: SIXTEEN - Potential Tropical Cyclone - Discussion
If I recall correctly, the last Atlantic TC to have advisories initiated as a 45kt TS was Irma... 

2 likes
Re: ATL: SIXTEEN - Potential Tropical Cyclone - Discussion
A couple small cells with high helicity popping up in that high theta-e / CAPE air to the west of the CoC.
This air is dynamite. Watch when the core gets there.
This air is dynamite. Watch when the core gets there.
1 likes
- HurricaneEnzo
- Category 2
- Posts: 739
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2018 12:18 pm
- Location: Newport, NC (Hurricane Alley)
Re: ATL: SIXTEEN - Potential Tropical Cyclone - Discussion
Earliest 'N' storm I assume?
0 likes
Bertha 96' - Fran 96' - Bonnie 98' - Dennis 99' - Floyd 99' - Isabel 03' - Alex 04' - Ophelia 05' - Irene 11' - Arthur 14' - Matthew 16' - Florence 18' - Dorian 19' - Isaias 20' (countless other tropical storms and Hurricane swipes)
I am not a Professional Met just an enthusiast. Get your weather forecasts from the Pros!
I am not a Professional Met just an enthusiast. Get your weather forecasts from the Pros!
Re: ATL: SIXTEEN - Potential Tropical Cyclone - Discussion
Didn't take long to go from PTC-16 to TS Nana.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: SIXTEEN - Potential Tropical Cyclone - Discussion
HurricaneEnzo wrote:Earliest 'N' storm I assume?
Correct. It beat Nate ‘05 by 4 days.
3 likes
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
Re: ATL: NANA - Tropical Storm - Discussion
Hmmm, a ML vort in the Yucatan channel.
Is that supposed to be there?

Is that supposed to be there?

0 likes
- HurricaneEnzo
- Category 2
- Posts: 739
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2018 12:18 pm
- Location: Newport, NC (Hurricane Alley)
Re: ATL: SIXTEEN - Potential Tropical Cyclone - Discussion
Aric Dunn wrote:annndd drum roll please..
here is ASCAT.
very likely would not be upgraded from this mess..
http://projects.knmi.nl/scatterometer/tile_prod/products/asc_b_20200901_14_47_flag.png
Yeah you could look at this yesterday and see it was more than just a 'wave axis' despite what ASCAT was showing. ASCAT is awesome a majority of the time but we have seen it can be thrown for loops in situations like this.
4 likes
Bertha 96' - Fran 96' - Bonnie 98' - Dennis 99' - Floyd 99' - Isabel 03' - Alex 04' - Ophelia 05' - Irene 11' - Arthur 14' - Matthew 16' - Florence 18' - Dorian 19' - Isaias 20' (countless other tropical storms and Hurricane swipes)
I am not a Professional Met just an enthusiast. Get your weather forecasts from the Pros!
I am not a Professional Met just an enthusiast. Get your weather forecasts from the Pros!
Re: ATL: NANA - Tropical Storm - Discussion
Product: Air Force Vortex Message (URNT12 KNHC)
Transmitted: 1st day of the month at 16:15Z
Agency: United States Air Force
Aircraft: Lockheed WC-130J Hercules with reg. number AF98-5307
Mission Purpose: Investigate fifth suspect area (flight in the North Atlantic basin)
Mission Number: 1
Observation Number: 12
A. Time of Center Fix: 1st day of the month at 15:36:50Z
B. Center Fix Coordinates: 16.48N 77.60W
B. Center Fix Location: 118 statute miles (191 km) to the SSW (206°) from Kingston, Jamaica.
C. Minimum Height at Standard Level: 720m (2,362ft) at 925mb
D. Minimum Sea Level Pressure: 1004mb (29.65 inHg) - Extrapolated
E. Dropsonde Surface Wind at Center (Undecoded): NA
F. Eye Character: Open in the northeast
G. Eye Shape & Diameter: Circular with a diameter of 6 nautical miles
H. Estimated (by SFMR or visually) Maximum Surface Wind Inbound: 45kts (51.8mph)
I. Location & Time of the Estimated Maximum Surface Wind Inbound: 4 nautical miles to the NNW (335°) of center fix at 15:35:30Z
J. Maximum Flight Level Wind Inbound: From 64° at 53kts (From the ENE at 61.0mph)
K. Location & Time of the Maximum Flight Level Wind Inbound: 4 nautical miles to the NNW (335°) of center fix at 15:35:30Z
L. Estimated (by SFMR or visually) Maximum Surface Wind Outbound: 53kts (61.0mph)
M. Location & Time of the Estimated Maximum Surface Wind Outbound: 8 nautical miles to the ENE (74°) of center fix at 15:40:00Z
N. Maximum Flight Level Wind Outbound: From 171° at 60kts (From the S at 69.0mph)
O. Location & Time of the Maximum Flight Level Wind Outbound: 7 nautical miles to the ENE (78°) of center fix at 15:39:30Z
P. Maximum Flight Level Temp & Pressure Altitude Outside Eye: 19°C (66°F) at a pressure alt. of 762m (2,500ft)
Q. Maximum Flight Level Temp & Pressure Altitude Inside Eye: 23°C (73°F) at a pressure alt. of 759m (2,490ft)
R. Dewpoint Temp (collected at same location as temp inside eye): 19°C (66°F)
R. Sea Surface Temp (collected at same location as temp inside eye): Not Available
S. Fix Determined By: Penetration, Radar, Wind, Pressure and Temperature
S. Fix Level: 925mb
T. Navigational Fix Accuracy: 0.02 nautical miles
T. Meteorological Accuracy: 1.25 nautical miles
Remarks Section:
Maximum Flight Level Wind: 60kts (~ 69.0mph) which was observed 7 nautical miles to the ENE (78°) from the flight level center at 15:39:30Z
Sea Level Pressure Extrapolation From: 925mb
Transmitted: 1st day of the month at 16:15Z
Agency: United States Air Force
Aircraft: Lockheed WC-130J Hercules with reg. number AF98-5307
Mission Purpose: Investigate fifth suspect area (flight in the North Atlantic basin)
Mission Number: 1
Observation Number: 12
A. Time of Center Fix: 1st day of the month at 15:36:50Z
B. Center Fix Coordinates: 16.48N 77.60W
B. Center Fix Location: 118 statute miles (191 km) to the SSW (206°) from Kingston, Jamaica.
C. Minimum Height at Standard Level: 720m (2,362ft) at 925mb
D. Minimum Sea Level Pressure: 1004mb (29.65 inHg) - Extrapolated
E. Dropsonde Surface Wind at Center (Undecoded): NA
F. Eye Character: Open in the northeast
G. Eye Shape & Diameter: Circular with a diameter of 6 nautical miles
H. Estimated (by SFMR or visually) Maximum Surface Wind Inbound: 45kts (51.8mph)
I. Location & Time of the Estimated Maximum Surface Wind Inbound: 4 nautical miles to the NNW (335°) of center fix at 15:35:30Z
J. Maximum Flight Level Wind Inbound: From 64° at 53kts (From the ENE at 61.0mph)
K. Location & Time of the Maximum Flight Level Wind Inbound: 4 nautical miles to the NNW (335°) of center fix at 15:35:30Z
L. Estimated (by SFMR or visually) Maximum Surface Wind Outbound: 53kts (61.0mph)
M. Location & Time of the Estimated Maximum Surface Wind Outbound: 8 nautical miles to the ENE (74°) of center fix at 15:40:00Z
N. Maximum Flight Level Wind Outbound: From 171° at 60kts (From the S at 69.0mph)
O. Location & Time of the Maximum Flight Level Wind Outbound: 7 nautical miles to the ENE (78°) of center fix at 15:39:30Z
P. Maximum Flight Level Temp & Pressure Altitude Outside Eye: 19°C (66°F) at a pressure alt. of 762m (2,500ft)
Q. Maximum Flight Level Temp & Pressure Altitude Inside Eye: 23°C (73°F) at a pressure alt. of 759m (2,490ft)
R. Dewpoint Temp (collected at same location as temp inside eye): 19°C (66°F)
R. Sea Surface Temp (collected at same location as temp inside eye): Not Available
S. Fix Determined By: Penetration, Radar, Wind, Pressure and Temperature
S. Fix Level: 925mb
T. Navigational Fix Accuracy: 0.02 nautical miles
T. Meteorological Accuracy: 1.25 nautical miles
Remarks Section:
Maximum Flight Level Wind: 60kts (~ 69.0mph) which was observed 7 nautical miles to the ENE (78°) from the flight level center at 15:39:30Z
Sea Level Pressure Extrapolation From: 925mb
1 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- weeniepatrol
- Category 5
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 5:30 pm
- Location: WA State
Re: ATL: NANA - Tropical Storm - Discussion
F. Eye Character: Open in the northeast
G. Eye Shape & Diameter: Circular with a diameter of 6 nautical miles
G. Eye Shape & Diameter: Circular with a diameter of 6 nautical miles
5 likes
- Hypercane_Kyle
- Category 5
- Posts: 3352
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
- Location: Cape Canaveral, FL
Re: ATL: SIXTEEN - Potential Tropical Cyclone - Discussion
HurricaneEnzo wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:annndd drum roll please..
here is ASCAT.
very likely would not be upgraded from this mess..
http://projects.knmi.nl/scatterometer/tile_prod/products/asc_b_20200901_14_47_flag.png
Yeah you could look at this yesterday and see it was more than just a 'wave axis' despite what ASCAT was showing. ASCAT is awesome a majority of the time but we have seen it can be thrown for loops in situations like this.
ASCAT doesn't have the resolution capability needed to be able to resolve small, weak LLCs. I miss QuikSCAT.
2 likes
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 22978
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
Re: ATL: NANA - Tropical Storm - Discussion
VERY small radius of max winds found by recon. ASCAT would have a hard time resolving peak winds with such a small circulation. Micro storm.
3 likes
Re: ATL: NANA - Tropical Storm - Discussion
Nana’s extremely compact core is impressive. Once hot towers start firing around it, she is going to go nuts.
2 likes
Irene '11 Sandy '12 Hermine '16 5/15/2018 Derecho Fay '20 Isaias '20 Elsa '21 Henri '21 Ida '21
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
I am only a meteorology enthusiast who knows a decent amount about tropical cyclones. Look to the professional mets, the NHC, or your local weather office for the best information.
Re: ATL: NANA - Tropical Storm - Discussion
GCANE wrote:Hmmm, a ML vort in the Yucatan channel.
Is that supposed to be there?
https://i.imgur.com/CPUsWFZ.png
I also saw they dropped the first radiosonde right around that point this morning.
1 likes
FAA ATP
Belize UAS Operator
Belize UAS Operator
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34002
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: ATL: NANA - Tropical Storm - Discussion
I'm guessing this will back up to 06Z as a TC in the ultimate best track.
Anyway, the pinhole eye might be a hint of rapid deepening coming?
Anyway, the pinhole eye might be a hint of rapid deepening coming?
1 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4966
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: NANA - Tropical Storm - Discussion
54kts unflagged SFMR in the SE/S quad
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4966
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am
Re: ATL: NANA - Tropical Storm - Discussion
Iris 2001 redux? Similar in track, size, and probably intensity if it gets to RI.


1 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests