
ATL: MARCO - Models
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- wxman22
- Category 5
- Posts: 1492
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:39 am
- Location: Wichita Falls, TX
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

3 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models
18Z Early models: The first time we have had a solid TVCN run on 97l, going right up to NOLA, clipping the Yucatan.


4 likes
- Portastorm
- Storm2k Moderator
- Posts: 9914
- Age: 63
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
- Location: Round Rock, TX
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models
stormlover2013 wrote:ridge will be to strong to go straight north
I wouldn't rule out a central Gulf coast hit. Rapid organization of 97L would mean greater likelihood of poleward movement.
1 likes
Any forecasts under my name are to be taken with a grain of salt. Get your best forecasts from the National Weather Service and National Hurricane Center.
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models
Portastorm wrote:stormlover2013 wrote:ridge will be to strong to go straight north
I wouldn't rule out a central Gulf coast hit. Rapid organization of 97L would mean greater likelihood of poleward movement.
ridge looks really stout, la to mexico, but more western la
0 likes
- South Texas Storms
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4224
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models
Portastorm wrote:stormlover2013 wrote:ridge will be to strong to go straight north
I wouldn't rule out a central Gulf coast hit. Rapid organization of 97L would mean greater likelihood of poleward movement.
Yeah Porta that would be just what we need. A TC tracking east of us here in TX to bring a continuation of our miserable hot and dry weather pattern.


But models are still all over the place with this system. Forecast confidence is definitely low.
Last edited by South Texas Storms on Wed Aug 19, 2020 2:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
3 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models
BobHarlem wrote:18Z Early models: The first time we have had a solid TVCN run on 97l, going right up to NOLA, clipping the Yucatan.
https://i.imgur.com/aPOp69W.gif
Notice the UKMET talk about 1-2 if that played out

0 likes
- Portastorm
- Storm2k Moderator
- Posts: 9914
- Age: 63
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
- Location: Round Rock, TX
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models
South Texas Storms wrote:Portastorm wrote:stormlover2013 wrote:ridge will be to strong to go straight north
I wouldn't rule out a central Gulf coast hit. Rapid organization of 97L would mean greater likelihood of poleward movement.
Yeah Porta that would be just what we need. A TC tracking east of us here in TX to bring a continuation of our miserable hot and dry weather pattern.![]()
But models are still all over the place with this system. Forecast confidence is definitely low.
Agreed. I see lots of volatility in most of the guidance. It is interesting though that I cannot recall a Texas landfalling named system hitting any further west/south than Corpus by this point in August. Maybe Bret in 1999? So any track from SE Texas to NOLA would seem pretty reasonable to my uneducated mind.
3 likes
Any forecasts under my name are to be taken with a grain of salt. Get your best forecasts from the National Weather Service and National Hurricane Center.
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models
Portastorm wrote:stormlover2013 wrote:ridge will be to strong to go straight north
I wouldn't rule out a central Gulf coast hit. Rapid organization of 97L would mean greater likelihood of poleward movement.
It better start gaining some lattitude then. The GFS-Para has it moving really fast, a hundred miles or so due north of the Yucatan on Sunday. Seems unreasonable.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2017 2:53 pm
- captainbarbossa19
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 1092
- Age: 27
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2019 11:09 pm
- Location: Beaumont, TX
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models
Steve wrote:ICON 36 hours
https://i.imgur.com/LybQeVW.png
It's slightly north of the 12z run at this point.
2 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models
Saturday 10:00am. Looks like 1005 which would be one of its lower readings in the WCAR the last few days. Could ICON go iconic for another storm in 2020? I don't know.


0 likes
- EquusStorm
- Category 5
- Posts: 1649
- Age: 34
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 1:04 pm
- Location: Jasper, AL
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models
<1000 at 90, this run definitely likes 97L
0 likes
Colors of lost purpose on the canvas of irrelevance
Not a meteorologist, in fact more of an idiot than anything. You should probably check with the NHC or a local NWS office for official information.
Not a meteorologist, in fact more of an idiot than anything. You should probably check with the NHC or a local NWS office for official information.
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models
120 hours below Louisiana, high pressure to hits north, we need a center for the models to latch on 2
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models
EquusStorm wrote:<1000 at 90, this run definitely likes 97L
Here it is at 999mb

My biggest takeaway from this run is that it doesn't spend 3-4 days at the Yucatan.
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models
stormlover2013 wrote:120 hours below Louisiana, high pressure to hits north, we need a center for the models to latch on 2
Hey '13, you're usually 5 or so minutes ahead of Tropical Tidbits. Are you going to the source sites or an aggregator of models site like weatherbell?
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models
At 114hr 26.8N and 89.0W no real intensification though 998mb.
At120hrs 27.5N and 89.2W 999mb.
At120hrs 27.5N and 89.2W 999mb.
Last edited by Javlin on Wed Aug 19, 2020 4:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models
ICON valid 120 hours. It may be a bit too far east. Props for leading the way with the system to begin with (along with the CMC at times). But I don't see a drop of 1mb crossing the loop current. Conditions shouldn't be that bad in the middle Gulf that it couldn't intensify more than it is showing. So I'm questioning the track and the intensity if it was to follow that track.


0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests