ECMWF

GFS

CMC

Moderator: S2k Moderators
Aric Dunn wrote:I think our best bet in the short term will be that mid to upper low east of the Bahamas. Models are very likely under doing and going to under do the amount of surface reflection that will develop,. it will likely be Sub tropical at first.
OuterBanker wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:I think our best bet in the short term will be that mid to upper low east of the Bahamas. Models are very likely under doing and going to under do the amount of surface reflection that will develop,. it will likely be Sub tropical at first.
Yes Aric.
All models this am are showing the low. Most are showing a block and a s it lingers off the N C to Nwe England coast.
Could drop to surface and become warm core, but doubt that it will get named.
Should stay off coast, but could be very problematic if it deepens more than forecast.
Shipping, surf and erosion are my main concerns.
gatorcane wrote:The overnight GFS runs have trended away from west through Nicaragua getting buried into CA. Latest sends in NW into the NW Caribbean where it recurves and heads NE barely missing South Florida. I’d say development chances have gone up substantially with other models coming on board.
The question is really how strong and where will it go. Climo suggests peninsula Florida is really going to need to pay attention.
LarryWx wrote:WxEp wrote:Through 264 hours, it looks like around 10-11 of the 51 EPS members develop a TC in the Western Caribbean. I believe this is the biggest signal for potential development that the EPS has shown so far.
Edit: Some move west into Central America, but the majority move north west and end up moving into the GOM or over Cuba. Obviously this far out any tracks are still highly suspect.
This fairly sharp increase in EPS activity to ~20% of members along with the GEFS finally showing signs of progressing/sticking with a busy 0Z on 10/18 is now starting to get me a bit concerned. That doesn't mean I think we should panic though. It just bares watching a bit more than it did earlier imo.
For example, here is the 0Z GEFS for 0Z on 10/18, my benchmark timeframe:
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfs-ens/2019100600/gfs-ememb_lowlocs_watl_49.png
xironman wrote:OuterBanker wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:I think our best bet in the short term will be that mid to upper low east of the Bahamas. Models are very likely under doing and going to under do the amount of surface reflection that will develop,. it will likely be Sub tropical at first.
Yes Aric.
All models this am are showing the low. Most are showing a block and a s it lingers off the N C to Nwe England coast.
Could drop to surface and become warm core, but doubt that it will get named.
Should stay off coast, but could be very problematic if it deepens more than forecast.
Shipping, surf and erosion are my main concerns.
Kind of looks like an STS to me, so I would not discount naming
https://i.imgur.com/o1mvCQA.png
The euro shows a gale lasting over 36 hours on the OBX that would be major erosion.
https://i.imgur.com/wZsuzST.png
xironman wrote:OuterBanker wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:I think our best bet in the short term will be that mid to upper low east of the Bahamas. Models are very likely under doing and going to under do the amount of surface reflection that will develop,. it will likely be Sub tropical at first.
Yes Aric.
All models this am are showing the low. Most are showing a block and a s it lingers off the N C to Nwe England coast.
Could drop to surface and become warm core, but doubt that it will get named.
Should stay off coast, but could be very problematic if it deepens more than forecast.
Shipping, surf and erosion are my main concerns.
Kind of looks like an STS to me, so I would not discount naming
https://i.imgur.com/o1mvCQA.png
The euro shows a gale lasting over 36 hours on the OBX that would be major erosion.
https://i.imgur.com/wZsuzST.png
SFLcane wrote:GFS is still an outlier...![]()
[l]https://twitter.com/andyhazelton/status/1180823012586774529?s=21 t][/url]
NDG wrote:Mark my words, there will be tropical development over in the Caribbean before the end of the month, SSTs there are the warmest in the basin, shear continues to be below average, strong easterly surface jet is not present with surface convergence continuing to be near average to slightly below average. Even the EPS shows slightly below average MSLPs through at least the next 10 days.
Ken711 wrote:xironman wrote:OuterBanker wrote:
Yes Aric.
All models this am are showing the low. Most are showing a block and a s it lingers off the N C to Nwe England coast.
Could drop to surface and become warm core, but doubt that it will get named.
Should stay off coast, but could be very problematic if it deepens more than forecast.
Shipping, surf and erosion are my main concerns.
Kind of looks like an STS to me, so I would not discount naming
https://i.imgur.com/o1mvCQA.png
The euro shows a gale lasting over 36 hours on the OBX that would be major erosion.
https://i.imgur.com/wZsuzST.png
Looks like a Nor'easter.
Hurricaneman wrote:Is it me or does the 12zGFS form this well NE of its previous runs
Edit: indeed forms this 150mi NE of the last several runs, much more dangerous position
Hurricaneman wrote:Is it me or does the 12zGFS form this well NE of its previous runs
Edit: indeed forms this 150mi NE of the last several runs, much more dangerous position
Hurricaneman wrote:Is it me or does the 12zGFS form this well NE of its previous runs
Edit: indeed forms this 150mi NE of the last several runs, much more dangerous position