And if it goes 15 to 20 nm west of there it will go right over me.
ATL: BARRY - Models
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
And if it goes 15 to 20 nm west of there it will go right over me.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
- Admin
- Posts: 20009
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models
As others have pointed out, the GFS tends to accel in this area and this time in the season. This will be very interesting to watch.
2 likes
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models
The experimental HAFS (Hurricane Analysis and Forecast System) model keeps 92L relatively weak, similar to the GFS:
https://twitter.com/AndyHazelton/status/1148570160359280649

https://twitter.com/AndyHazelton/status/1148570160359280649

1 likes
- ColdMiser123
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 904
- Age: 29
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:26 pm
- Location: Northeast US
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models
The 12z NAM 850 hPa vorticity max is west-southwest of the 6z run, looks slightly better aligned with the 700 hPa vorticity max so far.
0 likes
B.S., M.S., Meteorology & Atmospheric Science
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models
ColdMiser123 wrote:The 12z NAM 850 hPa vorticity max is west-southwest of the 6z run, looks slightly better aligned with the 700 hPa vorticity max so far.
Does that move the track back to a westerly track toward Texas?
0 likes
- ColdMiser123
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 904
- Age: 29
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:26 pm
- Location: Northeast US
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models
Still very close to the coast this run, so that will limit how strong it gets.
0 likes
B.S., M.S., Meteorology & Atmospheric Science
- HurricaneBrain
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 520
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:07 pm
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models
Gut feeling that the 12z GFS run swings back to the stronger intensity it showed in the 0z.
0 likes
- ColdMiser123
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 904
- Age: 29
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:26 pm
- Location: Northeast US
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models
HurricaneBrain wrote:Gut feeling that the 12z GFS run swings back to the stronger intensity it showed in the 0z.
If the NAM was 50 miles further south, it would have been a significantly stronger solution with better vertical alignment.
0 likes
B.S., M.S., Meteorology & Atmospheric Science
- ColdMiser123
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 904
- Age: 29
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:26 pm
- Location: Northeast US
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models
3km continues to be south of the 12 km with surface low placement. Pretty remarkable how different the evolution is actually compared to the 12km.
0 likes
B.S., M.S., Meteorology & Atmospheric Science
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models
ColdMiser123 wrote:3km continues to be south of the 12 km with surface low placement. Pretty remarkable how different the evolution is actually compared to the 12km.
Yeah. 12 just spins along the coast and eventually drops the circulation down toward South Texas, whereas the 3km, now run all the way to 84 hours, has an intensifying system just south of the LA Coast at 989mb and likely dropping at 56 hours.
. https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0912&fh=20
Last edited by Steve on Tue Jul 09, 2019 9:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models
1 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 2776
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:52 am
- Location: Biloxi Beach, Ms
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models
Steve wrote:ColdMiser123 wrote:3km continues to be south of the 12 km with surface low placement. Pretty remarkable how different the evolution is actually compared to the 12km.
Yeah. 12 just spins along the coast and eventually drops the circulation down toward South Texas, whereas the 3km, now run all the way to 84 hours, has an intensifying system just south of the LA Coast at 989mb and likely dropping at 56 hours.
. https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0912&fh=20
That 3k NAM run could increase the pucker pressure along the coast of LA if it were to come to fruition. Just sitting of the coast far enough from land doing loops and strengthening
1 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models
NAM 3km is finally finished running out to 60 hours (so 7pm Thursday Central Daylight Time). Barry is rapidly deepening and at 981 by the end of the run and dropping. Crazy. Though I'm not a fan of it in the tropics as most others aren't either, sometimes it gets clued in on stuff. Even though 20N is out of its range, it did get Harvey's pressure plunge ahead of some of the big dog models.
2 likes
- ColdMiser123
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 904
- Age: 29
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:26 pm
- Location: Northeast US
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models
Steve wrote:ColdMiser123 wrote:3km continues to be south of the 12 km with surface low placement. Pretty remarkable how different the evolution is actually compared to the 12km.
Yeah. 12 just spins along the coast and eventually drops the circulation down toward South Texas, whereas the 3km, now run all the way to 84 hours, has an intensifying system just south of the LA Coast at 989mb and likely dropping at 56 hours.
. https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0912&fh=20
That is one of the largest discrepancies I can remember between the 3km and the 12km with both placement and intensity of a tropical system.
The 3km also shifted quite a bit southwest compared to the 6z run.
3 likes
B.S., M.S., Meteorology & Atmospheric Science
- PTrackerLA
- Category 5
- Posts: 5277
- Age: 41
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
- Location: Lafayette, LA
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models
Steve wrote:NAM 3km is finally finished running out to 60 hours (so 7pm Thursday Central Daylight Time). Barry is rapidly deepening and at 981 by the end of the run and dropping. Crazy. Though I'm not a fan of it in the tropics as most others aren't either, sometimes it gets clued in on stuff. Even though 20N is out of its range, it did get Harvey's pressure plunge ahead of some of the big dog models.
That's a very concerning run from the 12z 3km NAM. I remember quite well how it accurately forecast the rapid deepening of Harvey before other models latched on.

Last edited by PTrackerLA on Tue Jul 09, 2019 10:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
2 likes
- MississippiWx
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1699
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:44 pm
- Location: Hattiesburg, Mississippi
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models
Steve wrote:NAM 3km is finally finished running out to 60 hours (so 7pm Thursday Central Daylight Time). Barry is rapidly deepening and at 981 by the end of the run and dropping. Crazy. Though I'm not a fan of it in the tropics as most others aren't either, sometimes it gets clued in on stuff. Even though 20N is out of its range, it did get Harvey's pressure plunge ahead of some of the big dog models.
Actually down to 979mb. It's odd that the model solutions are so different. The ones that develop the system strengthen it rather quickly. Then you have the other camp that barely even develops it into a tropical depression. It appears that the difference is in the alignment of the mid-level and low-level circulations. It's difficult to say which group is correct at this point.
2 likes
This post is not an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of MississippiWx and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- ColdMiser123
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 904
- Age: 29
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:26 pm
- Location: Northeast US
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models
MississippiWx wrote:Steve wrote:NAM 3km is finally finished running out to 60 hours (so 7pm Thursday Central Daylight Time). Barry is rapidly deepening and at 981 by the end of the run and dropping. Crazy. Though I'm not a fan of it in the tropics as most others aren't either, sometimes it gets clued in on stuff. Even though 20N is out of its range, it did get Harvey's pressure plunge ahead of some of the big dog models.
Actually down to 979mb. It's odd that the model solutions are so different. The ones that develop the system strengthen it rather quickly. Then you have the other camp that barely even develops it into a tropical depression. It appears that the difference is in the alignment of the mid-level and low-level circulations. It's difficult to say which group is correct at this point.
I would lean more toward the Euro solution at this point, since the GFS is doing a poor job depicting the current thunderstorm activity over the NE Gulf.
https://twitter.com/yconsor/status/1148593202980687872
0 likes
B.S., M.S., Meteorology & Atmospheric Science
- MississippiWx
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1699
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:44 pm
- Location: Hattiesburg, Mississippi
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models
12z ICON still strengthens 92L quickly off the Louisiana coast. Down to 976mb at 90 hours and still strengthening. It's about 50 miles to the east of the 6z run so far.
1 likes
This post is not an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of MississippiWx and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- ColdMiser123
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 904
- Age: 29
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:26 pm
- Location: Northeast US
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models
MississippiWx wrote:12z ICON still strengthens 92L quickly off the Louisiana coast. Down to 976mb at 90 hours and still strengthening. It's about 50 miles to the east of the 6z run so far.
Something worth noting too is that while it is further east, it is actually slower than the 6z run. 0z/6z were already starting to make landfall at this point.
12z RGEM is well south of the 12 km NAM, and south of the 6z run. It's pretty close to the 3km in terms of placement.
0 likes
B.S., M.S., Meteorology & Atmospheric Science
- tarheelprogrammer
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models
12z GFS is not showing any vorticity making it into the GOM until tomorrow at 06z. Ummmmmmmmm, am I see things incorrectly 

0 likes
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests