ATL: FLORENCE - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
hohnywx
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 508
Age: 34
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:34 pm
Location: Hastings-on-Hudson, NY

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#421 Postby hohnywx » Tue Sep 04, 2018 9:46 am

otowntiger wrote:
plasticup wrote:
Nearly direct hit from a Cat 3. That's an unsettling scenario.

I'm sorry, if I missed dfiscussion about this earlier, but serious question, who's getting a direct hit in this scenario?


That speck of land at 32N would be Bermuda.
0 likes   

User avatar
toad strangler
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4543
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#422 Postby toad strangler » Tue Sep 04, 2018 9:46 am

otowntiger wrote:
plasticup wrote:
Nearly direct hit from a Cat 3. That's an unsettling scenario.

I'm sorry, if I missed dfiscussion about this earlier, but serious question, who's getting a direct hit in this scenario?


Bermuda
0 likes   

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5464
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#423 Postby chaser1 » Tue Sep 04, 2018 9:51 am

Emmett_Brown wrote:The FV3 did well with Lane. Here is an article discussing it: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/cap ... ad1031583a


Thanks for the read. Good article, albeit brief. I'd be curious how the FV3 performed verses other models with regard to Lane's intensity forecasts. I'd also be curious to know how the HWRF performed with regard to intensity as well. I think the HWRF was introduced at a time when the GFDL was still a respected model and one I had liked for a time. Not even sure I ever hear it even referenced anymore.
0 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

AxaltaRacing24
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1753
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#424 Postby AxaltaRacing24 » Tue Sep 04, 2018 10:00 am

chaser1 wrote:
Emmett_Brown wrote:The FV3 did well with Lane. Here is an article discussing it: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/cap ... ad1031583a


Thanks for the read. Good article, albeit brief. I'd be curious how the FV3 performed verses other models with regard to Lane's intensity forecasts. I'd also be curious to know how the HWRF performed with regard to intensity as well. I think the HWRF was introduced at a time when the GFDL was still a respected model and one I had liked for a time. Not even sure I ever hear it even referenced anymore.

The HMON replaced starting last season.
0 likes   

LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6305
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#425 Postby LarryWx » Tue Sep 04, 2018 10:09 am

SconnieCane wrote:06Z GFS recurves Florence between Bermuda and NC but brings it all the way down to 925MB as it does so. Irma-ing? Conditions will be better than it's in now, but not THAT favorable, no?


Yes, I think the 925 mb is most likely due to Irma-ing (lowering pressures too much).
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

OuterBanker
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1731
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 10:53 am
Location: Nags Head, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#426 Postby OuterBanker » Tue Sep 04, 2018 11:23 am

Although I would like to believe the current Euro and a fish by 60w I don’t think that the windshield wipers are through. Until it takes the right at the fork in the road I will keep a cautious eye. After reading the article on the FV3 I am going to paying more attention to it. It was no surprise that the GFS was and is the least accurate. The fv3 surprised me. Of particular interest is that it does take Flo out to sea but at the end of the run it appears to have a west heading monster. Does anyone know which system it’s referring to”
0 likes   

drewschmaltz
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 350
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 8:19 pm

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#427 Postby drewschmaltz » Tue Sep 04, 2018 11:24 am

Irma-ing


Lowest pressure for Irma was 914. 882 was lowest GFS I believe. Had it not dipped south both before PR and into Cuba and encountered the warmest waters intact, I don't doubt it would have come close.
0 likes   
I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT. PLEASE CONSULT SOMEONE WHO DOES. START WITH THE NHC. ALL POSTS ARE FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY.

LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6305
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#428 Postby LarryWx » Tue Sep 04, 2018 11:29 am

drewschmaltz wrote:
Irma-ing


Lowest pressure for Irma was 914. 882 was lowest GFS I believe. Had it not dipped south both before PR and into Cuba and encountered the warmest waters intact, I don't doubt it would have come close.


But the GFS even had it as low as the 890s SE of the SC/NC border! That's insane. The higher resolution GFS tends to lower pressures too much in general in the subtropics just as I think it is doing with Florence now.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Kazmit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2124
Age: 22
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:49 am
Location: Williamsburg, VA / Bermuda

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#429 Postby Kazmit » Tue Sep 04, 2018 11:34 am

12z GFS is further east, and OTS. Looks like we finally have agreement between the GFS and the Euro.
0 likes   
Igor 2010, Sandy 2012, Fay 2014, Gonzalo 2014, Joaquin 2015, Nicole 2016, Humberto 2019

I am only a tropical weather enthusiast. My predictions are not official and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Ken711
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1074
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:48 pm

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#430 Postby Ken711 » Tue Sep 04, 2018 11:51 am

LarryWx wrote:
drewschmaltz wrote:
Irma-ing


Lowest pressure for Irma was 914. 882 was lowest GFS I believe. Had it not dipped south both before PR and into Cuba and encountered the warmest waters intact, I don't doubt it would have come close.


But the GFS even had it as low as the 890s SE of the SC/NC border! That's insane. The higher resolution GFS tends to lower pressures too much in general in the subtropics just as I think it is doing with Florence now.


I think it was even slightly further North with the 890s at the NC/VA border depicted by the GFS.
1 likes   

plasticup

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#431 Postby plasticup » Tue Sep 04, 2018 12:17 pm

Kazmit wrote:12z GFS is further east, and OTS. Looks like we finally have agreement between the GFS and the Euro.

Yep, they both have a solid recurve now. Funny how much can change in 24 hours.
0 likes   

User avatar
toad strangler
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4543
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#432 Postby toad strangler » Tue Sep 04, 2018 12:19 pm

plasticup wrote:
Kazmit wrote:12z GFS is further east, and OTS. Looks like we finally have agreement between the GFS and the Euro.

Yep, they both have a solid recurve now. Funny how much can change in 24 hours.



Well I wouldn't call one run of the Euro solid .... although ensembles at 12z were leading that way yesterday.
0 likes   

plasticup

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#433 Postby plasticup » Tue Sep 04, 2018 12:22 pm

By "solid" I meant that they firmly recurved the storm well short of any land. Not that this single set of runs makes the conclusion "solid".
1 likes   

drewschmaltz
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 350
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 8:19 pm

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#434 Postby drewschmaltz » Tue Sep 04, 2018 12:25 pm

there was some pretty warm water on the way there. warmer than where it was.

Image
0 likes   
I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT. PLEASE CONSULT SOMEONE WHO DOES. START WITH THE NHC. ALL POSTS ARE FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY.

LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6305
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#435 Postby LarryWx » Tue Sep 04, 2018 12:31 pm

Last 4 GEFS runs with regard to TS+ hits on the US SE coast out of (~20 members):

18Z Mon 0 hits
0Z Tue 0 hits
6Z Tue 4 hits: FL/GA border, SC/NC border, NC OB, skirt NC OB
12Z Tue 2 hits: GA/SC border, SC

So, low risk remains, but odds still much better to stay away.
Last edited by LarryWx on Tue Sep 04, 2018 12:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

plasticup

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#436 Postby plasticup » Tue Sep 04, 2018 12:33 pm

drewschmaltz wrote:there was some pretty warm water on the way there. warmer than where it was.

What are we looking at here? That's not Florence. The only thing at that latitude is 92L, but not even the long-range models correlate with those markers. And the SST is different. I am confused.
0 likes   

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#437 Postby txwatcher91 » Tue Sep 04, 2018 12:33 pm

Meanwhile the CMC has for several runs now shown a near miss or coastal scraper for NC/VA area.
Image
0 likes   

drewschmaltz
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 350
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 8:19 pm

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#438 Postby drewschmaltz » Tue Sep 04, 2018 12:34 pm

plasticup wrote:
drewschmaltz wrote:there was some pretty warm water on the way there. warmer than where it was.

What are we looking at here? That's not Florence. The only thing at that latitude is 92L, but not even the long-range models correlate with those markers. And the SST is different. I am confused.


I went way too offtopic. Was saying "irma-ing" might not be the best term for the models overdoing a storm. I tried to delete, but there were already responses.
0 likes   
I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT. PLEASE CONSULT SOMEONE WHO DOES. START WITH THE NHC. ALL POSTS ARE FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY.

plasticup

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#439 Postby plasticup » Tue Sep 04, 2018 12:36 pm

txwatcher91 wrote:Meanwhile the CMC has for several runs now shown a near miss or coastal scraper for NC/VA area.
Image

It gets there via a blocking high at 25N. That is so different from the model consensus and so near in the future (it diverges around 78-90 hours) that it is hard to take seriously.
1 likes   

OuterBanker
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1731
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 10:53 am
Location: Nags Head, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#440 Postby OuterBanker » Tue Sep 04, 2018 1:05 pm

Today's Euro was like a pardon from the Govenor. :D
0 likes   


Return to “2018”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest