cycloneye wrote:So far ECMWF doesn't have anything.
There's not a single Ensemble Member of the 12z run of the ECM EPS with anything either out 15 days. Several develop closed Lows over in the EPAC but nothing Carib. or GOM.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
cycloneye wrote:So far ECMWF doesn't have anything.
Dean4Storms wrote:cycloneye wrote:So far ECMWF doesn't have anything.
There's not a single Ensemble Member of the 12z run of the ECM EPS with anything either out 15 days. Several develop closed Lows over in the EPAC but nothing Carib. or GOM.
wxman57 wrote:If you remember, the GFS picked up on Alberto in the extended range (beyond 10 days). However, its initial forecast of development was around the 18th of May, not the 25th. The date slipped back for 4-5 days and settled in on the 24th. At that time (within 10 days), the EC and Canadian picked up on it. Perhaps the GFS is too early with development again? Watch for the development date to slip back to the the third week of June vs. the second, and then see if the other models pick up on it within 10 days. This may occur early next week.
The GFS model in recent runs has been predicting what may be a Central American Gyre (CAG)--similar to the one that spawned Subtropical Storm Alberto--to form over Central America as early as June 6, though. About 30% of the 20 members of the 0Z Friday GFS model ensemble predicted that a tropical depression would spin up out of this CAG in the Western Caribbean sometime during the period June 6 – 12, according to a custom forecast product supplied to WU by cfanclimate.com. Back in mid-May, the GFS model did correctly forecast the genesis of Alberto from a CAG seven days in advance, but only after issuing about a week’s worth of false alarm forecasts. So, until the European and/or UKMET model echo the GFS forecast, we should not pay undue attention to its long-range musings.
wxman57 wrote:If you remember, the GFS picked up on Alberto in the extended range (beyond 10 days). However, its initial forecast of development was around the 18th of May, not the 25th. The date slipped back for 4-5 days and settled in on the 24th. At that time (within 10 days), the EC and Canadian picked up on it. Perhaps the GFS is too early with development again? Watch for the development date to slip back to the the third week of June vs. the second, and then see if the other models pick up on it within 10 days. This may occur early next week.
MississippiWx wrote:This would be surprising with a downward phase of the MJO across the area. I’m very skeptical of this.
aperson wrote:I think it's important to note that GFS is currently heavily biased toward generating false positives at long range forecasts.
https://twitter.com/mattlanza/status/1002257548991500293
Users browsing this forum: sasha_B and 45 guests