ATL: JOSE - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

Re: ATL: JOSE - Models

#261 Postby txwatcher91 » Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:20 am

GBPackMan wrote:
otowntiger wrote:
GBPackMan wrote:
The UK models had predicted it going much further south into Cuba, just inland from the southern shore before the turn, a much slower turn sending it into the gulf (several towards the panhandle) most runs, and over Cuba for a much longer duration.... It was always the westernmost outlier. It showed the trend much better overall but was a bit more "extreme" relating to far it would move outside of 48 hours, putting less weight on the trough and upper level shear.

I guess it depends on your definition of 'extreme' but it sure didn't wind up that far off in my opinion. When. All the models were still showing an east coast event, ukmet was taking Irma to Cuba and back north into sw Florida IIRC.


The real track ended up closer with UKMET and Euro than the others going 48-72 hours out, but with its westerly movement both were still consistently south and west of actual track. Once it made that northern turn, UK and Euro were consistently too far west and the UK model lost its accuracy at that point. For the westerly motion, it showed a trend but did not have the accuracy of other models. Some are excellent at 6-24 hours, some are better at 24-48, but accuracy for all of them degrades greatly beyond 48 hours, meaning you have to look at the trend, not actual positioning.
Other models did much better after that northern turn, as if some models can handle East/West interactions better, and others can handle north/south interactions better. After the turn GFS was much more spot on than the Euro/UK models that kept it out in the Gulf heading towards the panhandle.


Yes, from what I've noticed the UKMET is good for predicting general patterns and track of a TC 3+ days out where others may struggle. Euro seems to excel with strong ridging pushing a wave west across the Atlantic but struggles with the N turn while GFS seems to want to recurve something moving west too soon but when a storm does move north it excels. That's why the UKMET is interesting for Jose... it seems to do the best at picking out a general track in these "complex" setups even moreso than the Euro.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: JOSE - Models

#262 Postby Aric Dunn » Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:50 am

12z GFS is trending even more to the right.. UKMET is going to have to swing around soon or the other models are going to swing to the ukmet..
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Ken711
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1074
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:48 pm

Re: ATL: JOSE - Models

#263 Postby Ken711 » Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:56 am

Aric Dunn wrote:12z GFS is trending even more to the right.. UKMET is going to have to swing around soon or the other models are going to swing to the ukmet..


When does the next UKMET run start?
0 likes   

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

Re: ATL: JOSE - Models

#264 Postby txwatcher91 » Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:02 am

Aric Dunn wrote:12z GFS is trending even more to the right.. UKMET is going to have to swing around soon or the other models are going to swing to the ukmet..


But notice the ridging is much stronger on the GFS... and it moves Jose due east basically with very little south motion whereas it seems like Jose is already starting a ESE turn right now... The key to me is the overall synoptics with a much stronger ridge. I don't trust the GFS to handle the loop correctly, it has always been very poor at that.
0 likes   

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4030
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: JOSE - Models

#265 Postby AutoPenalti » Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:13 am

txwatcher91 wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:12z GFS is trending even more to the right.. UKMET is going to have to swing around soon or the other models are going to swing to the ukmet..


But notice the ridging is much stronger on the GFS... and it moves Jose due east basically with very little south motion whereas it seems like Jose is already starting a ESE turn right now... The key to me is the overall synoptics with a much stronger ridge. I don't trust the GFS to handle the loop correctly, it has always been very poor at that.

Remembering the random loop it showed with Matthew...
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: JOSE - Models

#266 Postby Alyono » Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:13 am

HURRICANE JOSE ANALYSED POSITION : 27.2N 68.6W

ATCF IDENTIFIER : AL122017

LEAD CENTRAL MAXIMUM WIND
VERIFYING TIME TIME POSITION PRESSURE (MB) SPEED (KNOTS)
-------------- ---- -------- ------------- -------------
1200UTC 12.09.2017 0 27.2N 68.6W 977 61
0000UTC 13.09.2017 12 26.5N 66.8W 968 71
1200UTC 13.09.2017 24 25.4N 66.1W 971 66
0000UTC 14.09.2017 36 24.4N 66.4W 969 73
1200UTC 14.09.2017 48 23.9N 67.6W 967 76
0000UTC 15.09.2017 60 23.7N 69.4W 966 79
1200UTC 15.09.2017 72 23.9N 71.9W 965 78
0000UTC 16.09.2017 84 24.2N 74.5W 960 78
1200UTC 16.09.2017 96 24.7N 76.9W 949 81
0000UTC 17.09.2017 108 25.1N 79.0W 950 83
1200UTC 17.09.2017 120 25.8N 80.3W 945 81
0000UTC 18.09.2017 132 26.6N 81.3W 962 63
1200UTC 18.09.2017 144 27.0N 82.3W 972 63

Think the UK just went all in with a Miami landfall now
1 likes   

bqknight
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 107
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 8:47 am
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL: JOSE - Models

#267 Postby bqknight » Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:18 am

Alyono wrote:HURRICANE JOSE ANALYSED POSITION : 27.2N 68.6W

ATCF IDENTIFIER : AL122017

LEAD CENTRAL MAXIMUM WIND
VERIFYING TIME TIME POSITION PRESSURE (MB) SPEED (KNOTS)
-------------- ---- -------- ------------- -------------
1200UTC 12.09.2017 0 27.2N 68.6W 977 61
0000UTC 13.09.2017 12 26.5N 66.8W 968 71
1200UTC 13.09.2017 24 25.4N 66.1W 971 66
0000UTC 14.09.2017 36 24.4N 66.4W 969 73
1200UTC 14.09.2017 48 23.9N 67.6W 967 76
0000UTC 15.09.2017 60 23.7N 69.4W 966 79
1200UTC 15.09.2017 72 23.9N 71.9W 965 78
0000UTC 16.09.2017 84 24.2N 74.5W 960 78
1200UTC 16.09.2017 96 24.7N 76.9W 949 81
0000UTC 17.09.2017 108 25.1N 79.0W 950 83
1200UTC 17.09.2017 120 25.8N 80.3W 945 81
0000UTC 18.09.2017 132 26.6N 81.3W 962 63
1200UTC 18.09.2017 144 27.0N 82.3W 972 63

Think the UK just went all in with a Miami landfall now



Any insight from a Pro Met as to why the UKMET is sticking to this solution and for now is the only one doing so?
0 likes   

Ken711
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1074
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:48 pm

Re: ATL: JOSE - Models

#268 Postby Ken711 » Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:19 am

Alyono wrote:HURRICANE JOSE ANALYSED POSITION : 27.2N 68.6W

ATCF IDENTIFIER : AL122017

LEAD CENTRAL MAXIMUM WIND
VERIFYING TIME TIME POSITION PRESSURE (MB) SPEED (KNOTS)
-------------- ---- -------- ------------- -------------
1200UTC 12.09.2017 0 27.2N 68.6W 977 61
0000UTC 13.09.2017 12 26.5N 66.8W 968 71
1200UTC 13.09.2017 24 25.4N 66.1W 971 66
0000UTC 14.09.2017 36 24.4N 66.4W 969 73
1200UTC 14.09.2017 48 23.9N 67.6W 967 76
0000UTC 15.09.2017 60 23.7N 69.4W 966 79
1200UTC 15.09.2017 72 23.9N 71.9W 965 78
0000UTC 16.09.2017 84 24.2N 74.5W 960 78
1200UTC 16.09.2017 96 24.7N 76.9W 949 81
0000UTC 17.09.2017 108 25.1N 79.0W 950 83
1200UTC 17.09.2017 120 25.8N 80.3W 945 81
0000UTC 18.09.2017 132 26.6N 81.3W 962 63
1200UTC 18.09.2017 144 27.0N 82.3W 972 63

Think the UK just went all in with a Miami landfall now


Meanwhile 12z GFS is much further east.
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: JOSE - Models

#269 Postby Alyono » Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:21 am

bqknight wrote:
Alyono wrote:HURRICANE JOSE ANALYSED POSITION : 27.2N 68.6W

ATCF IDENTIFIER : AL122017

LEAD CENTRAL MAXIMUM WIND
VERIFYING TIME TIME POSITION PRESSURE (MB) SPEED (KNOTS)
-------------- ---- -------- ------------- -------------
1200UTC 12.09.2017 0 27.2N 68.6W 977 61
0000UTC 13.09.2017 12 26.5N 66.8W 968 71
1200UTC 13.09.2017 24 25.4N 66.1W 971 66
0000UTC 14.09.2017 36 24.4N 66.4W 969 73
1200UTC 14.09.2017 48 23.9N 67.6W 967 76
0000UTC 15.09.2017 60 23.7N 69.4W 966 79
1200UTC 15.09.2017 72 23.9N 71.9W 965 78
0000UTC 16.09.2017 84 24.2N 74.5W 960 78
1200UTC 16.09.2017 96 24.7N 76.9W 949 81
0000UTC 17.09.2017 108 25.1N 79.0W 950 83
1200UTC 17.09.2017 120 25.8N 80.3W 945 81
0000UTC 18.09.2017 132 26.6N 81.3W 962 63
1200UTC 18.09.2017 144 27.0N 82.3W 972 63

Think the UK just went all in with a Miami landfall now



Any insight from a Pro Met as to why the UKMET is sticking to this solution and for now is the only one doing so?


it remains the most intense model, though it is slightly weaker than before. Looking at satellite, Jose may be a touch more intense than NHC is estimating, so I don't think we can totally ignore this solution. It remains quite unlikely, however
0 likes   

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

Re: ATL: JOSE - Models

#270 Postby txwatcher91 » Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:22 am

bqknight wrote:
Alyono wrote:HURRICANE JOSE ANALYSED POSITION : 27.2N 68.6W

ATCF IDENTIFIER : AL122017

LEAD CENTRAL MAXIMUM WIND
VERIFYING TIME TIME POSITION PRESSURE (MB) SPEED (KNOTS)
-------------- ---- -------- ------------- -------------
1200UTC 12.09.2017 0 27.2N 68.6W 977 61
0000UTC 13.09.2017 12 26.5N 66.8W 968 71
1200UTC 13.09.2017 24 25.4N 66.1W 971 66
0000UTC 14.09.2017 36 24.4N 66.4W 969 73
1200UTC 14.09.2017 48 23.9N 67.6W 967 76
0000UTC 15.09.2017 60 23.7N 69.4W 966 79
1200UTC 15.09.2017 72 23.9N 71.9W 965 78
0000UTC 16.09.2017 84 24.2N 74.5W 960 78
1200UTC 16.09.2017 96 24.7N 76.9W 949 81
0000UTC 17.09.2017 108 25.1N 79.0W 950 83
1200UTC 17.09.2017 120 25.8N 80.3W 945 81
0000UTC 18.09.2017 132 26.6N 81.3W 962 63
1200UTC 18.09.2017 144 27.0N 82.3W 972 63

Think the UK just went all in with a Miami landfall now



Any insight from a Pro Met as to why the UKMET is sticking to this solution and for now is the only one doing so?


I’m not a promet but it seems the GFS and other models show a weaker system that cuts under the ridging and heads north. The UK seems to show a deeper system that’s steered more by the ridging and goes west instead of north.
0 likes   

User avatar
DESTRUCTION5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4423
Age: 43
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
Location: Stuart, FL

Re: ATL: JOSE - Models

#271 Postby DESTRUCTION5 » Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:31 am

Alyono wrote:HURRICANE JOSE ANALYSED POSITION : 27.2N 68.6W

ATCF IDENTIFIER : AL122017

LEAD CENTRAL MAXIMUM WIND
VERIFYING TIME TIME POSITION PRESSURE (MB) SPEED (KNOTS)
-------------- ---- -------- ------------- -------------
1200UTC 12.09.2017 0 27.2N 68.6W 977 61
0000UTC 13.09.2017 12 26.5N 66.8W 968 71
1200UTC 13.09.2017 24 25.4N 66.1W 971 66
0000UTC 14.09.2017 36 24.4N 66.4W 969 73
1200UTC 14.09.2017 48 23.9N 67.6W 967 76
0000UTC 15.09.2017 60 23.7N 69.4W 966 79
1200UTC 15.09.2017 72 23.9N 71.9W 965 78
0000UTC 16.09.2017 84 24.2N 74.5W 960 78
1200UTC 16.09.2017 96 24.7N 76.9W 949 81
0000UTC 17.09.2017 108 25.1N 79.0W 950 83
1200UTC 17.09.2017 120 25.8N 80.3W 945 81
0000UTC 18.09.2017 132 26.6N 81.3W 962 63
1200UTC 18.09.2017 144 27.0N 82.3W 972 63

Think the UK just went all in with a Miami landfall now


The consistancy of it brining it west is quite mind boggling.
1 likes   
GATOR NATION IS E V E R Y W H E R E !

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4030
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: JOSE - Models

#272 Postby AutoPenalti » Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:34 am

Is that like 5 runs now that the UKMET shows some sort of Florida landfall?
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

User avatar
galaxy401
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2419
Age: 30
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 9:04 pm
Location: Casa Grande, Arizona

Re: ATL: JOSE - Models

#273 Postby galaxy401 » Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:34 am

Well I suppose this storm will prove how much we should trust the UK model. It's been consistently the outlier for Jose but if the model is correct, suddenly there is a new model to compete with the others.
0 likes   
Got my eyes on moving right into Hurricane Alley: Florida.

User avatar
ColdMiser123
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 904
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:26 pm
Location: Northeast US

Re: ATL: JOSE - Models

#274 Postby ColdMiser123 » Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:46 am

The 12z CMC is absurd, and is a good indicator as to why you should not generally use it for tropical forecasting.
0 likes   
B.S., M.S., Meteorology & Atmospheric Science

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: JOSE - Models

#275 Postby Steve » Tue Sep 12, 2017 12:00 pm

ColdMiser123 wrote:The 12z CMC is absurd, and is a good indicator as to why you should not generally use it for tropical forecasting.


Except the CMC beat the GFS at almost every verification period for Irma. NHC cites it, and if you know its strengths and weaknesses and compare it to what other models are doing knowing their strengths and weaknesses, it's useful.

As for the 12Z CMC, you can see why it does what it does. It builds high pressure in Eastern Canada and reverses the pattern toward the 10 day period with the Pacific Northwest going low pressure (has been very warm in there with high pressure for a while) where the mean U.S. trough during Irma was in the Central US. I'm not making a call as to whether it's right or not. I have no idea. I'm just saying what the run shows which isn't all that different than what GFS did for several days in a row end of last week and this past weekend.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=440
1 likes   

sma10
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1710
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:13 pm

Re: ATL: JOSE - Models

#276 Postby sma10 » Tue Sep 12, 2017 12:04 pm

AutoPenalti wrote:Is that like 5 runs now that the UKMET shows some sort of Florida landfall?


What is so amazing to me is how the UK solution is so disparate to the GFS/Euro solutions at relatively short time parameters. At what point this week are we going to know which solution is closer to the truth?
0 likes   

bqknight
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 107
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 8:47 am
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL: JOSE - Models

#277 Postby bqknight » Tue Sep 12, 2017 12:13 pm

sma10 wrote:
AutoPenalti wrote:Is that like 5 runs now that the UKMET shows some sort of Florida landfall?


What is so amazing to me is how the UK solution is so disparate to the GFS/Euro solutions at relatively short time parameters. At what point this week are we going to know which solution is closer to the truth?


Most models take it to about 65W, while the UKMET turns it more South at 66W. The UKMET also takes it below 25N, while the other keep it above.
0 likes   

User avatar
chris_fit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3222
Age: 42
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 11:58 pm
Location: Tampa Bay Area, FL

Re: ATL: JOSE - Models

#278 Postby chris_fit » Tue Sep 12, 2017 12:17 pm

ColdMiser123 wrote:The 12z CMC is absurd, and is a good indicator as to why you should not generally use it for tropical forecasting.



Indeed.... Here is the run...

Image
0 likes   

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

Re: ATL: JOSE - Models

#279 Postby txwatcher91 » Tue Sep 12, 2017 12:18 pm

bqknight wrote:
sma10 wrote:
AutoPenalti wrote:Is that like 5 runs now that the UKMET shows some sort of Florida landfall?


What is so amazing to me is how the UK solution is so disparate to the GFS/Euro solutions at relatively short time parameters. At what point this week are we going to know which solution is closer to the truth?


Most models take it to about 65W, while the UKMET turns it more South at 66W. The UKMET also takes it below 25N, while the other keep it above.


And the UK is stronger which means it would be steered more by the upper level ridging building in.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: JOSE - Models

#280 Postby Aric Dunn » Tue Sep 12, 2017 12:21 pm

Pretty sure that is 6 runs in a row. The seperation grows between all the models and ukmet.

The thing i just noticed is the ukmet intialized it further ese from the nhc 11am position. Which is where i pegged the center earlier. It has been moving ese for at least 8 hours

Image
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Stormybajan and 9 guests