ATL: IRMA - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
weathaguyry
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1272
Age: 22
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 5:16 am
Location: Long Island, NY

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1681 Postby weathaguyry » Thu Aug 31, 2017 6:07 pm

AxaltaRacing24 wrote:
meriland29 wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:
That would be a $200 billion + disaster. That seems an accurate estimate.


Well I don't doubt its destructiveness. 200 billion though you think? Katrina was the most costly ever recorded at 108 billion, and you estimate double?

Yes. New England and NY are MUCH more populated than Katrina's impact area.


Not to mention the abundance of old style, high up wooden homes in the area
1 likes   
My posts are only my opinions and NOT official forecasts. For official forecasts, consult the National Hurricane Center or the National Weather Service.

Irene 11', Sandy 12', Fay 20’, Isaias 20’, Elsa 21’, Henri 21’, Ida 21’

clambite
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15
Age: 72
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2016 9:26 am
Location: Morehead City, NC

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1682 Postby clambite » Thu Aug 31, 2017 6:09 pm

p1nheadlarry wrote:
Panfan1995 wrote:This is more of a SC/NC storm like Hugo


Not really. Hugo bee-lined right into the east coast. If anything it's more like Floyd or Irene. Hugo was more like Fran and Isabel.


Hugo was forecasted to come up to NC... then took a left into Charleston. I was in Morehead City, listening to radio (before the weather channel) and I heard what was coming and I was scared to death !
3 likes   

WilmingtonSandbar
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 505
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:11 pm
Location: Southport, NC

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1683 Postby WilmingtonSandbar » Thu Aug 31, 2017 6:12 pm

clambite wrote:
p1nheadlarry wrote:
Panfan1995 wrote:This is more of a SC/NC storm like Hugo


Not really. Hugo bee-lined right into the east coast. If anything it's more like Floyd or Irene. Hugo was more like Fran and Isabel.


Hugo was forecasted to come up to NC... then took a left into Charleston. I was in Morehead City, listening to radio (before the weather channel) and I heard what was coming and I was scared to death !


I remember Hugo well, also. It was my senior year of high school, and we were scheduled to take a college visit to The Citadel the next week. We were in Southport, NC and prepped for a strike when it turned west. Needless to say the trip to The Citadel was rescheduled.
1 likes   
Diana X2 (look it up), Bertha, Fran, Bonnie, Floyd, Dennis, Charley, Ophelia, Ernesto, Irene, Matthew, And Florence

JPmia
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1070
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 11:01 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1684 Postby JPmia » Thu Aug 31, 2017 6:15 pm

0 likes   

JPmia
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1070
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 11:01 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1685 Postby JPmia » Thu Aug 31, 2017 6:18 pm

 https://twitter.com/ryanmaue/status/903357153582481410




Thankfully she's still in the medium/long range for the models, but wow.
Last edited by JPmia on Thu Aug 31, 2017 6:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1686 Postby RL3AO » Thu Aug 31, 2017 6:19 pm



Don't take these values seriously. Further discussion on twitter shows that there is some weird corrections being made to the ensembles.
5 likes   

User avatar
meriland29
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:05 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1687 Postby meriland29 » Thu Aug 31, 2017 6:19 pm

The GFS supposes a cat 4/5 monster to hit NE. Not a single Cat 4 or 5 has ever been recorded to hit that area since we started naming storms...
2 likes   

JPmia
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1070
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 11:01 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1688 Postby JPmia » Thu Aug 31, 2017 6:21 pm

1 likes   

storm4u
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 651
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 7:26 am
Location: agawam, ma
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1689 Postby storm4u » Thu Aug 31, 2017 6:30 pm

Gfs was scary for us up here in ma...
1 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1690 Postby KWT » Thu Aug 31, 2017 6:32 pm

RL3AO wrote:


Don't take these values seriously. Further discussion on twitter shows that there is some weird corrections being made to the ensembles.


I was going to say, I've never seen ensemble members agree on cat-5 that far out. With that being said if it takes the track of the ECM, I'd not be all that surprised if those ensemble members aren't far off from the truth.

With that being said, every single ECM ensemble member I've seen so far have been such 960mbs, most have been in the 940s and 930s, so clearly plenty of cat-4s in there!
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

curtadams
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1122
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: Orange, California
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1691 Postby curtadams » Thu Aug 31, 2017 6:46 pm

meriland29 wrote:The GFS supposes a cat 4/5 monster to hit NE. Not a single Cat 4 or 5 has ever been recorded to hit that area since we started naming storms...
I don't think there has ever been a cat 4+ in NE since Europeans came there, even before we started naming storms. The Great New England Hurricane was "only" a Cat 3. The Great Colonial Hurricane of 1635 *might* have been a 4, but obviously records are poor.
2 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1692 Postby KWT » Thu Aug 31, 2017 6:49 pm

GFS ensembles have come in stronger this run.

Also many more obvious threats to the states, still most north of Florida but I'd say well over half of the members have good chance of making landfall on the US at 240hrs, with most bending NW, only a couple have an obvious recurve bend to the NE.
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

hurricaneCW
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
Location: Toms River, NJ

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1693 Postby hurricaneCW » Thu Aug 31, 2017 6:53 pm

There is no way of knowing what will happen, it's a total guessing game right now. Great video by Levi explaining the situation and some possibilities right now.

It's been a while since we had a true long tracker like this including Matthew.
5 likes   

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4236
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1694 Postby SouthFLTropics » Thu Aug 31, 2017 6:55 pm

curtadams wrote:
meriland29 wrote:The GFS supposes a cat 4/5 monster to hit NE. Not a single Cat 4 or 5 has ever been recorded to hit that area since we started naming storms...
I don't think there has ever been a cat 4+ in NE since Europeans came there, even before we started naming storms. The Great New England Hurricane was "only" a Cat 3. The Great Colonial Hurricane of 1635 *might* have been a 4, but obviously records are poor.


Off Model Topic but interesting read on the Great Colonial Hurricane of 1635 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Col ... ne_of_1635
1 likes   
Fourth Generation Florida Native

Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24

User avatar
tiger_deF
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 468
Age: 24
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2016 11:47 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1695 Postby tiger_deF » Thu Aug 31, 2017 6:56 pm

The GFS seems unrealistic. According to TT water temperatures are running well below average acrss the east coast, and already once it gets to NY latitude it is in 20 or 19 degree waters. How can a hurricane sustain itself with those SSTs?
1 likes   

User avatar
ftolmsteen
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 122
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 6:34 am
Location: Port Richey, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1696 Postby ftolmsteen » Thu Aug 31, 2017 7:01 pm

tiger_deF wrote:The GFS seems unrealistic. According to TT water temperatures are running well below average acrss the east coast, and already once it gets to NY latitude it is in 20 or 19 degree waters. How can a hurricane sustain itself with those SSTs?

I agree. Plenty of buoys in the northeast showing 70 degree temps. I can't see how it can maintain that intensity at that location.
2 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1697 Postby Hurricaneman » Thu Aug 31, 2017 7:01 pm

ftolmsteen wrote:
tiger_deF wrote:The GFS seems unrealistic. According to TT water temperatures are running well below average acrss the east coast, and already once it gets to NY latitude it is in 20 or 19 degree waters. How can a hurricane sustain itself with those SSTs?

I agree. Plenty of buoys in the northeast showing 70 degree temps. I can't see how it can maintain that intensity at that location.

Baroclinic processes
2 likes   

storm4u
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 651
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 7:26 am
Location: agawam, ma
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1698 Postby storm4u » Thu Aug 31, 2017 7:05 pm

Water temps are above normal.. I dont know where you saw below... Forward speed also on the gfs not alot of time to weaken

tiger_deF wrote:The GFS seems unrealistic. According to TT water temperatures are running well below average acrss the east coast, and already once it gets to NY latitude it is in 20 or 19 degree waters. How can a hurricane sustain itself with those SSTs?
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1699 Postby Steve » Thu Aug 31, 2017 7:11 pm

It's probably fruitless to ask since I've been at this online since the mid 90s. It's been a long, long time since there was a threat of a major with a wide spread in possible landfalls. That inevitably leads to -removed- and model wars. Please consider that model x isn't better than model y because it's closer to you. There are long time posters that I'm not going to name who almost never miss the opportunity to wishcast based on the models that show a storm coming to them. Many of them would argue for the Clipper model if it showed it going near to them. Models hitting anything over 10 days out are rare. The GFS being one of them is rarer. Please consider that probably at least a few hundred people or more will read your post. For instance, if you are in Louisiana, try to consider why the North Carolina or Florida model may be right. Hundreds of people thank you in advance.
15 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1700 Postby Bocadude85 » Thu Aug 31, 2017 7:18 pm

It really will be interesting to see which model is correct, the GFS has been just as consistent as the Euro with Irma missing the Caribbean to the north. I'm leaning towards Irma missing Florida to the east but I can't get this feeling out of my mind that Irma could end the major hurricane drought in S.Fla.
0 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests