ATL: IRMA - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
weathaguyry
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1272
Age: 22
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 5:16 am
Location: Long Island, NY

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1001 Postby weathaguyry » Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:50 pm

As we can tell, the GFS has no interest in climatology, reasonable steering currents, or the laws of physics for this run
3 likes   
My posts are only my opinions and NOT official forecasts. For official forecasts, consult the National Hurricane Center or the National Weather Service.

Irene 11', Sandy 12', Fay 20’, Isaias 20’, Elsa 21’, Henri 21’, Ida 21’

User avatar
ColdMiser123
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 904
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:26 pm
Location: Northeast US

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1002 Postby ColdMiser123 » Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:54 pm

weathaguyry wrote:As we can tell, the GFS has no interest in climatology, reasonable steering currents, or the laws of physics for this run


Nothing violated the laws of physics in that run.
1 likes   
B.S., M.S., Meteorology & Atmospheric Science

AxaltaRacing24
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1753
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1003 Postby AxaltaRacing24 » Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:56 pm

ColdMiser123 wrote:
weathaguyry wrote:As we can tell, the GFS has no interest in climatology, reasonable steering currents, or the laws of physics for this run


Nothing violated the laws of physics in that run.

Plowing straight through the ridge was an obvious bias in that run to say the least though. It couldn't get this thing north fast enough.
1 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1004 Postby CrazyC83 » Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:58 pm

This setup really screams Isabel to me. That seems to be the storm most similar due to the incoming trough, higher latitude initiation and strong ridge.
0 likes   

User avatar
meriland29
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:05 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1005 Postby meriland29 » Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:58 pm

I agree, and am also disappointed that the GFS could make such a type of error, it is basic physics. This however, makes me even more intrigued for the Euro run.
1 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1006 Postby ConvergenceZone » Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:59 pm

While an East Coast Landfall definitely isn't fantasy land, plowing through the ridge definitely is. It is interesting though that this is the first model run of an East Coast Landfall. Wish I could stay up for the EURO
1 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1007 Postby Bocadude85 » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:03 am

According to the 0Z HWRF Irma will gain 1.4 degrees in latitude in the next 24 hours...we shall see..she still seems to be trucking off to the west to me.
0 likes   

Digital-TC-Chaser

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1008 Postby Digital-TC-Chaser » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:06 am

Image
Canadian model also picks the weakness in the steering before the windward Islands.

Cant just have blindfolds on too all model that are not EC.
1 likes   

User avatar
meriland29
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:05 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1009 Postby meriland29 » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:06 am

In other news, Irma's current look...


Image


She really is getting that swirl..
0 likes   

User avatar
weathaguyry
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1272
Age: 22
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 5:16 am
Location: Long Island, NY

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1010 Postby weathaguyry » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:07 am

CrazyC83 wrote:This setup really screams Isabel to me. That seems to be the storm most similar due to the incoming trough, higher latitude initiation and strong ridge.


This also comes to mind as something that was at a fairly high latitude
Image
1 likes   
My posts are only my opinions and NOT official forecasts. For official forecasts, consult the National Hurricane Center or the National Weather Service.

Irene 11', Sandy 12', Fay 20’, Isaias 20’, Elsa 21’, Henri 21’, Ida 21’

Digital-TC-Chaser

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1011 Postby Digital-TC-Chaser » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:10 am

meriland29 wrote:In other news, Irma's current look...




She really is getting that swirl..



Yes she going too be one sexy system when mature.
2 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1012 Postby Alyono » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:13 am

AxaltaRacing24 wrote:
tarheelprogrammer wrote:Any METs have a clue as to why the GFS goes through the ridge in long term?

It is physically impossible lol. The GFS is making its own rules tonight 8-)



GFS has been doing this BS since 2004. NCEP has never addressed this obvious flaw in the model
4 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1013 Postby Alyono » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:15 am

weathaguyry wrote:Landfall in Maine at 252hrs as a 954mb, whatever you want to call it, large enough to create TS winds south of Long Island :roll:



it's a LOT more intense than 954. The pressure rose due to the resolution truncation. It is basically saying a legit cat 3 into Maine with a real pressure around 920mb
2 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1014 Postby Bocadude85 » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:15 am

Digital-TC-Chaser wrote:Image
Canadian model also picks the weakness in the steering before the windward Islands.

Cant just have blindfolds on too all model that are not EC.


I agree that we have to factor in both the GFS and Canadian, it will be interesting to see what their ensembles show. The 12Z ensembles for both were farther west then the op runs.
0 likes   

User avatar
meriland29
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:05 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1015 Postby meriland29 » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:17 am

What time approx does Euro start?
0 likes   

AxaltaRacing24
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1753
Age: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1016 Postby AxaltaRacing24 » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:17 am

meriland29 wrote:What time approx does Euro start?

Around 1:45 EST
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1017 Postby CrazyC83 » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:20 am

Alyono wrote:
weathaguyry wrote:Landfall in Maine at 252hrs as a 954mb, whatever you want to call it, large enough to create TS winds south of Long Island :roll:



it's a LOT more intense than 954. The pressure rose due to the resolution truncation. It is basically saying a legit cat 3 into Maine with a real pressure around 920mb


I wonder if the GFS doesn't simulate extratropical transition very well? Since by then it would likely be close to, if not, extratropical.
0 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1018 Postby Bocadude85 » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:23 am

0 likes   

User avatar
meriland29
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:05 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1019 Postby meriland29 » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:35 am

Image
0 likes   

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4030
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Models

#1020 Postby AutoPenalti » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:38 am

I just got back from the airport to check on the GFS and I have to say... Just. WOW.

Not only does it go below 900mb, it actually rams through the Ridge up towards a landmass.

Holy cow!
1 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests