ATL: GERT - Post-Tropical - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
As a point of interest, I've been warily keeping an eye on this wave in the Bahamas preceding 99L and it's steady WNW motion. Unlikely to suddenly spin up, i believe this shallow to mid level feature has been able to primarily slide further west in part becsuse it is not a deeper vertically stacked system and given its latitude might then justify a more NW motion as the EURO had been suggesting 99L might soon take. Point is, if 99L continues on a more 275-285 heading in the near term and continue to pulsate but not quite sustain deep convection for at least 48 hours or more, then I could see an increased threat of mid term genesis occurring further west than the EURO is projecting and a risk of a closer in spin up that might then be oriented to far south and west to necessarily swing east of the CONUS. I definitely believe it's one to keep a close eye on.
1 likes
Andy D
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models
Weaker could mean "no developmrnt" but it could also mean a near term primarily low level feature that moves further west with shallow low level trades. Downstream implications range from zero, to the potential of a further west and south forming tropical cyclone that may then pose a greater threat to the Bahamas and points along the US Coastline then present models suggest
0 likes
Andy D
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
- northjaxpro
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
- Location: Jacksonville, FL
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models
I agree. The southern vorticity is in the process I believe of taking over as the primary one. The system I believe could be re-initialized as far as 400-500 miles to the south and west . This could have potential major implications down the pike for sure.
1 likes
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!
________________________________________________________________________________________
Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019
________________________________________________________________________________________
Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models
northjaxpro wrote:I agree. The southern vorticity is in the process I believe of taking over as the primary one. The system I believe could be re-initialized as far as 400-500 miles to the south and west . This could have potential major implications down the pike for sure.
Could this be the cause of the Euro run being weaker (and the GFS not developing), essentially initializing the wrong end of the wave?
0 likes
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models
[quote="Kingarabian"]00z Euro coming in weaker compared to the past two runs. 72hrs:
72hrs is is a good forecast time the way the models are atm.
weaker storm also off SE.
http://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php ... watl&dpdt=
72hrs is is a good forecast time the way the models are atm.
weaker storm also off SE.
http://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php ... watl&dpdt=
1 likes
- northjaxpro
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
- Location: Jacksonville, FL
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models
Hammy wrote:northjaxpro wrote:I agree. The southern vorticity is in the process I believe of taking over as the primary one. The system I believe could be re-initialized as far as 400-500 miles to the south and west . This could have potential major implications down the pike for sure.
Could this be the cause of the Euro run being weaker (and the GFS not developing), essentially initializing the wrong end of the wave?
I really think this has been a real possibility all along. We should get a better idea hopefully about this within the next 24 hours or so.
0 likes
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!
________________________________________________________________________________________
Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019
________________________________________________________________________________________
Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
Okay, this is weird?? We've all probably heard the expression "a sucker hole", with regards to one incorrectly attributing a certain (cloud or other) feature as being the center of a tropical cyclone, right? So check this one out.....
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... 0-lalo.gif
I found this rather odd and it shows up now (As of the time of this post) for 99L on both the Vid. & RGB satellite resolution. Oddly, I expected this feature to be some reflection of water vapor but it doesn't show up on that resolution. I hope someone else is up and watching so that this might be recorded as a loop.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... 0-lalo.gif
I found this rather odd and it shows up now (As of the time of this post) for 99L on both the Vid. & RGB satellite resolution. Oddly, I expected this feature to be some reflection of water vapor but it doesn't show up on that resolution. I hope someone else is up and watching so that this might be recorded as a loop.
Last edited by chaser1 on Wed Aug 09, 2017 5:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Andy D
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
I'm not sure if my last post above was entirely clear. Look at the large "eye feature" that appears at first light just south of the more northern area of convection associated with 99L.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... 0-lalo.gif
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... 0-lalo.gif
0 likes
Andy D
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
I think they might want to up the chances from zero.. to at least 50 percent for that southern area of convection.
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
Aric Dunn wrote:I think they might want to up the chances from zero.. to at least 50 percent for that southern area of convection.
Yep, I was thinking the very same thing. Even if they'd prefer to err on the side of caution, I'd certainly up it to 20% within 48 hours (and in a hurry). I'd probably go with 30% within 48 hr's, and 50% within 5 days but I'd even consider that as rather conservative
0 likes
Andy D
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
chaser1 wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:I think they might want to up the chances from zero.. to at least 50 percent for that southern area of convection.
Yep, I was thinking the very same thing. Even if they'd prefer to err on the side of caution, I'd certainly up it to 20% within 48 hours (and in a hurry). I'd probably go with 30% within 48 hr's, and 50% within 5 days but I'd even consider that as rather conservative
Yeah there was clearly a circualtion yesterday before sunset just limited convection.. the convection is still not all too organized but has been persistant arounf that circ for about 12 hours now. There is some wswwinds at least looking at early visible.
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models
00z Euro trended much weaker, probably was way overdoing the intensity on this so now it is closer to the GFS. Chances this strikes the U.S. are slim now in my opinion.
1 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
interesting..

Pretty clear there is a small closed circ..


Pretty clear there is a small closed circ..

0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
I only saw the southern vort last night, and the convection this morning will probably keep that alive.
Not sure if its a good thing or not, although it would tend to limit development further north it might become the primary center and change the models.
Not sure if its a good thing or not, although it would tend to limit development further north it might become the primary center and change the models.
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
I'm just wondering if it's more of a transient feature; such as being one of multiple competing areas of vorticity? Overall though, my guess is that this is the more dominant cyclonic feature but perhaps a tighter reflection of about the mid to 850mb levels, and maybe only now just getting closer to working its way down to the surface?
1 likes
Andy D
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
Nimbus wrote:I only saw the southern vort last night, and the convection this morning will probably keep that alive.
Not sure if its a good thing or not, although it would tend to limit development further north it might become the primary center and change the models.
One thing to consider..... if in fact this were to become the dominant feature, it's apparent small & tight COC would certainly NOT be good news for the Leeward & Virgin islands given these two factors:
1) increased oceanic water temps
2) the potential for faster deepening given its small size
2 likes
Andy D
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
- Kingarabian
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 15980
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
- Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
- SFLcane
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 10163
- Age: 47
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
- Location: Lake Worth Florida
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models
Some 06z models turning this abruptly wnw-nw rather quickly now away from the SE.
0 likes
- Kingarabian
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 15980
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
- Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
Aric Dunn wrote:interesting..
[img]https://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/htdocs_dyn_apache/PUBLIC/tc_pages/thumbs/medium/tc17/ATL/99L.INVEST/amsub/89/2degreeticks/20170809.0708.noaa19.x.89.99LINVEST.25kts-1012mb-165N-545W.100pc.jpg[img]
Pretty clear there is a small closed circ..
[img]https://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc17/ATL/99L.INVEST/tc_ssmis/91h/2degreeticks/20170809.0714.f16.x.91h.99LINVEST.25kts-1012mb-165N-545W.62pc.jpg[/ig]
Wonder how long it'll hold with models beginning to back off.
Certainly does look closed... although I want to point out that we had systems in the Epac with defined LLCs on microwave imagery yet the NHC would not classify them until later if ever.
1 likes
RIP Kobe Bryant
Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion
There it is! I'm hearing it in my head again
Someone key up that song, Bad Moon Rising!!

Someone key up that song, Bad Moon Rising!!
Last edited by chaser1 on Wed Aug 09, 2017 6:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes
Andy D
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests