ATL: GERT - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145322
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#1001 Postby cycloneye » Tue Aug 08, 2017 6:57 pm

Kazmit wrote:Up to 0%/40%

1. A trough of low pressure located about 650 miles east of the
Leeward Islands continues to produce disorganized showers and
thunderstorms. Environmental conditions are expected to remain
unfavorable for significant development during the next couple of
days. However, environmental conditions are forecast to become
a little more conducive for development late this week while the
system moves generally west-northwestward at about 15 mph over the
western Atlantic.
* Formation chance through 48 hours...low...near 0 percent.
* Formation chance through 5 days...medium...40 percent.


Image
1 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#1002 Postby txwatcher91 » Tue Aug 08, 2017 7:07 pm

Looks like the environment will be improving soon with much lower shear ahead.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
weathaguyry
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1272
Age: 22
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 5:16 am
Location: Long Island, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#1003 Postby weathaguyry » Tue Aug 08, 2017 7:08 pm

I would definitely say that this would be much more of an issue for the OBX northward, as of now Florida will not be affected, and models are not showing it anywhere close to there.
0 likes   
My posts are only my opinions and NOT official forecasts. For official forecasts, consult the National Hurricane Center or the National Weather Service.

Irene 11', Sandy 12', Fay 20’, Isaias 20’, Elsa 21’, Henri 21’, Ida 21’

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#1004 Postby gatorcane » Tue Aug 08, 2017 7:23 pm

The GFS develops an upper-level low just east of the Bahamas in 3 days with increasing wind shear from the north by days 5 and beyond. Plus it shows a lot of dry air as some have pointed out. The situation reminds me of when Hermine was an invest in a similar area last year where the Euro kept showing a hurricane into the Bahamas and South Florida while the GFS did not show much due to upper-level low in Bahamas. GFS ended up verifying as the Euro completely missed the upper-level low.
0 likes   

User avatar
weathaguyry
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1272
Age: 22
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 5:16 am
Location: Long Island, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#1005 Postby weathaguyry » Tue Aug 08, 2017 7:26 pm

gatorcane wrote:The GFS develops an upper-level low just east of the Bahamas in 3 days with increasing wind shear from the north by days 5 and beyond. Plus it shows a lot of dry air as some have pointed out. The situation reminds me of when Hermine was an invest in a similar area last year where the Euro kept showing a hurricane into the Bahamas and South Florida while the GFS did not show much due to upper-level low in Bahamas. GFS ended up verifying.


Yes, very similar situation, but just farther east. GFS went on a fathom spree far out, then completely dropped development. Very much like it is doing now with 99L
0 likes   
My posts are only my opinions and NOT official forecasts. For official forecasts, consult the National Hurricane Center or the National Weather Service.

Irene 11', Sandy 12', Fay 20’, Isaias 20’, Elsa 21’, Henri 21’, Ida 21’

User avatar
blp
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2840
Age: 46
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#1006 Postby blp » Tue Aug 08, 2017 7:27 pm

Evolution next 48hours will be very interesting. Some have mentioned that jump to the NNW during the 36-48hr time frame. It shows up in Euro and CMC.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22979
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#1007 Postby wxman57 » Tue Aug 08, 2017 7:29 pm

GFS, EC, and CMC all predict an upper-level & surface pattern along the East U.S. Coast that would support a NE turn offshore. That said, it will come down to timing. If 99L arrives early and/or the upper-trof is a bit late, then there could be a landfall in the Carolinas. For now, my gut says recurve offshore (assuming it develops). I see the NHC is up to 40% beyond 48 hrs. All along, I've said the best chance of this disturbance developing would be farther west, well beyond their 80% at day 5 earlier prediction. I'm thinking 70-80% chance of development Sat/Sun.
4 likes   

User avatar
blp
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2840
Age: 46
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#1008 Postby blp » Tue Aug 08, 2017 7:29 pm

Problem I see with GFS is it eventually latches onto the northern vorticity once it reaches north of the islands versus the southern one that is stronger and is used by Euro and CMC.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
weathaguyry
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1272
Age: 22
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 5:16 am
Location: Long Island, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#1009 Postby weathaguyry » Tue Aug 08, 2017 7:35 pm

wxman57 wrote:GFS, EC, and CMC all predict an upper-level & surface pattern along the East U.S. Coast that would support a NE turn offshore. That said, it will come down to timing. If 99L arrives early and/or the upper-trof is a bit late, then there could be a landfall in the Carolinas. For now, my gut says recurve offshore (assuming it develops). I see the NHC is up to 40% beyond 48 hrs. All along, I've said the best chance of this disturbance developing would be farther west, well beyond their 80% at day 5 earlier prediction. I'm thinking 70-80% chance of development Sat/Sun.


If 99L gets there early, and the trof is late, could NY/NJ be affected by this, or would it probably only be the Carolinas then out to sea?
1 likes   
My posts are only my opinions and NOT official forecasts. For official forecasts, consult the National Hurricane Center or the National Weather Service.

Irene 11', Sandy 12', Fay 20’, Isaias 20’, Elsa 21’, Henri 21’, Ida 21’

Socalhurcnegirl227
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 267
Age: 36
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:39 pm
Location: Santa Barbara, CA

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#1010 Postby Socalhurcnegirl227 » Tue Aug 08, 2017 7:46 pm

gatorcane wrote:The GFS develops an upper-level low just east of the Bahamas in 3 days with increasing wind shear from the north by days 5 and beyond. Plus it shows a lot of dry air as some have pointed out. The situation reminds me of when Hermine was an invest in a similar area last year where the Euro kept showing a hurricane into the Bahamas and South Florida while the GFS did not show much due to upper-level low in Bahamas. GFS ended up verifying as the Euro completely missed the upper-level low.

Yup said this yesterday lol very much similar to hermine especially being that hermine was a 99L. Hermine as an invest didnt want to die and apparently neither does possible future Gert.
1 likes   
"I'm a wandress, i'm a one night stand,
dont belong to no city, dont belong to no man
i'm the violence in the pouring rain,
I'm a hurricane"

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145322
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#1011 Postby cycloneye » Tue Aug 08, 2017 7:55 pm

00z Best Track:

AL, 99, 2017080900, , BEST, 0, 160N, 533W, 25, 1011, DB
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 3999
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#1012 Postby AJC3 » Tue Aug 08, 2017 7:57 pm

gatorcane wrote:The GFS develops an upper-level low just east of the Bahamas in 3 days with increasing wind shear from the north by days 5 and beyond. Plus it shows a lot of dry air as some have pointed out. The situation reminds me of when Hermine was an invest in a similar area last year where the Euro kept showing a hurricane into the Bahamas and South Florida while the GFS did not show much due to upper-level low in Bahamas. GFS ended up verifying as the Euro completely missed the upper-level low.


What I think we may have going on here is a little bit of a chicken vs. egg thing. The GFS and ECM are nearly identical in their 500-200MB height/wind/vort patterns through 00Z SAT. Both models retrograde a pinched off piece of the mid-oceanic trough (i.e. a TUTT low) westward from about 40-45N along 20-25W underneath the mid/upper reflection of the Bermuda ridge for several days.

However, in spite of almost identical mid-upper patterns, there's YUGE difference in the extent of surface development in the two models up through that time. The GFS shows a weak inverted trough with pressures around 1014-1015MB, while the ECM shows a 1007MB TS. Beyond that time, the ECM continues to spin up the TC to where it creates an upper level anticyclone which pretty much eats up whatever is left of the upper low. Any increase in upper tropospheric NE or E shear east of Florida is at least partially attributable to the eastern flank of an upper level (Sonoran) ridge building eastward across the southern U.S.

To me the GFS' lack of development doesn't appear to be due to a stronger upper level low , but rather the lack of development through 72-84 hours results in less development of upper ridging aloft, which allows the upper low to maintain a more coherent identity. Like I said at the beginning of my post...chicken/egg.
2 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4822
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#1013 Postby ronjon » Tue Aug 08, 2017 7:58 pm

GFS wants to split the vorticity with the northern one becoming dominant. If the southern one developed with its faster motion, it would take it into S FL. Not saying that is likely, but still some uncertainty yet.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#1014 Postby gatorcane » Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:06 pm

AJC3 wrote:
gatorcane wrote:The GFS develops an upper-level low just east of the Bahamas in 3 days with increasing wind shear from the north by days 5 and beyond. Plus it shows a lot of dry air as some have pointed out. The situation reminds me of when Hermine was an invest in a similar area last year where the Euro kept showing a hurricane into the Bahamas and South Florida while the GFS did not show much due to upper-level low in Bahamas. GFS ended up verifying as the Euro completely missed the upper-level low.


What I think we may have going on here is a little bit of a chicken vs. egg thing. The GFS and ECM are nearly identical in their 500-200MB height/wind/vort patterns through 00Z SAT. Both models retrograde a pinched off piece of the mid-oceanic trough (i.e. a TUTT low) westward from about 40-45N along 20-25W underneath the mid/upper reflection of the Bermuda ridge for several days.

However, in spite of almost identical mid-upper patterns, there's YUGE difference in the extent of surface development in the two models up through that time. The GFS shows a weak inverted trough with pressures around 1014-1015MB, while the ECM shows a 1007MB TS. Beyond that time, the ECM continues to spin up the TC to where it creates an upper level anticyclone which pretty much eats up whatever is left of the upper low. Any increase in upper tropospheric NE or E shear east of Florida is at least partially attributable to the eastern flank of an upper level (Sonoran) ridge building eastward across the southern U.S.

To me the GFS' lack of development doesn't appear to be due to a stronger upper level low , but rather the lack of development through 72-84 hours results in less development of upper ridging aloft, which allows the upper low to maintain a more coherent identity. Like I said at the beginning of my post...chicken/egg.


Thanks for that detailed explanation. That makes sense. Now which model will end up verifying will be interesting as they have such a vastly different outcome for 99l or maybe we will end up with something in the middle of the GFS and ECMWF. By the way, didn't know it was called a Sonoran ridge. Always learning something on Storm2K.
0 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 3999
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#1015 Postby AJC3 » Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:13 pm

gatorcane wrote: Thanks for that detailed explanation. That makes sense. Now which model will end up verifying will be interesting as they have such a vastly different outcome for 99l or maybe we will end up with something in the middle of the GFS and ECMWF. By the way, didn't know it was called a Sonoran ridge. Haven't heard that before.


"Sonoran" basically references the area of the US desert SW. It may be a bit of a misnomer to use it in that context, but all it is referencing is essentially a ridge building eastward from the southern tier of the central U.S.

Of course, as much as I hate the GFS-bashfest that often time goes on around here, given that the consensus of the global models and ensembles favor something closer to the ECM solution, I'd have to favor that over the GFS. Plus we're starting to see a pretty good convective blowup right over the center of 99L's primary (southern) vortmax.
0 likes   

floridasun78
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: miami fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#1016 Postby floridasun78 » Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:17 pm

look like their now storm near area llc tonight let see how look in morning
0 likes   

User avatar
AubreyStorm
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 337
Age: 44
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2017 6:21 pm
Location: Texas, USA

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#1017 Postby AubreyStorm » Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:31 pm

Hmmmm! Due west? Interesting for now.
0 likes   
The posts are NOT an official forecast. Please REFER to the NHC and NWS for official forecasts and products.

Digital-TC-Chaser

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Models

#1018 Postby Digital-TC-Chaser » Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:39 pm

EC
Image


Image
The NCEP ens look clear of any low within striking distance atm.
0 likes   

floridasun78
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: miami fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#1019 Postby floridasun78 » Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:39 pm

AubreyStorm wrote:Hmmmm! Due west? Interesting for now.

it expect move west untill weekend move to wnw by sat
0 likes   

User avatar
weathaguyry
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1272
Age: 22
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 5:16 am
Location: Long Island, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#1020 Postby weathaguyry » Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:42 pm

I really don't think Florida is under the gun with this one, trough is strong and High isn';t quite strong enough to steer it into Florida, that could change, but as of now Florida looks to be pretty safe from this one
0 likes   
My posts are only my opinions and NOT official forecasts. For official forecasts, consult the National Hurricane Center or the National Weather Service.

Irene 11', Sandy 12', Fay 20’, Isaias 20’, Elsa 21’, Henri 21’, Ida 21’


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests