Ivanhater wrote:Off topic..but ex td4 trending a bit stronger on the Euro coming into the northern gulf coast..that may need to be watched down the road
Yeah. Seeing a system with TS force winds into the panhandle.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Ivanhater wrote:Off topic..but ex td4 trending a bit stronger on the Euro coming into the northern gulf coast..that may need to be watched down the road
Kingarabian wrote:Dylan wrote:Kingarabian wrote:
It's not that impressive on satellite in all reality compared to when it first splashed down. So depth of the vort is all subjective by the models.
That happens all of the time. Satellite presentation is a moot point at this time. What we do have is satelite data, and the GFS has the best initialization based on the data. How are we to blame the ECMWF if it's being fed garbage? I'd post the image because it's clear as day, but I'm on my phone.
The high resolution Euro at 6hrs has an identical vort depth as the GFS. So I'm assuming it has the right information.
What we should question is if all the models have the same RH information.
Dylan wrote:Kingarabian wrote:Dylan wrote:
That happens all of the time. Satellite presentation is a moot point at this time. What we do have is satelite data, and the GFS has the best initialization based on the data. How are we to blame the ECMWF if it's being fed garbage? I'd post the image because it's clear as day, but I'm on my phone.
The high resolution Euro at 6hrs has an identical vort depth as the GFS. So I'm assuming it has the right information.
What we should question is if all the models have the same RH information.
I have a Weatherbell account, and I'm looking at it now. The European does not have a nearly as concentrated 850mb vort as what the satellite derived data from CIMSS is presenting, or what the GFS closely initialized with. To me, that is a red flag.
Kingarabian wrote:Dylan wrote:Kingarabian wrote:
The high resolution Euro at 6hrs has an identical vort depth as the GFS. So I'm assuming it has the right information.
What we should question is if all the models have the same RH information.
I have a Weatherbell account, and I'm looking at it now. The European does not have a nearly as concentrated 850mb vort as what the satellite derived data from CIMSS is presenting, or what the GFS closely initialized with. To me, that is a red flag.
Initialization aside, every model except for the operational GFS have generally unfavorable conditions across the MDR and in the Caribbean.
This system will have to become a hurricane before it reaches the Caribbean so that it may have a chance in fending off the higher shear waiting for it. And the odds of this becoming a hurricane in the next 72hrs are quite low.
Dylan wrote:Kingarabian wrote:Dylan wrote:
I have a Weatherbell account, and I'm looking at it now. The European does not have a nearly as concentrated 850mb vort as what the satellite derived data from CIMSS is presenting, or what the GFS closely initialized with. To me, that is a red flag.
Initialization aside, every model except for the operational GFS have generally unfavorable conditions across the MDR and in the Caribbean.
This system will have to become a hurricane before it reaches the Caribbean so that it may have a chance in fending off the higher shear waiting for it. And the odds of this becoming a hurricane in the next 72hrs are quite low.
I don't disagree with you about that, but that's a different conversation concerning the environmental conditions. Remember though that a strong system the GFS is depicting would be able to have its own strong upper level anti-cyclonic circulation to not only brush off any shear, but use it for ventilation.
About the initialization of the ECM we can agree to disagree. I'm 10 months from getting my Meteorology Degree, and I trust what I see based on the data available to me. And it's clear that the GFS initialied future 95L better than the ECMWF based on the Satellite derived data from CIMSS.
TheStormExpert wrote:Was there even any EPS support to begin with?
Users browsing this forum: Ulf and 47 guests