ATL: FOUR - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
AtlanticWind
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1889
Age: 66
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 9:57 pm
Location: Plantation,Fla

Re: ATL: FOUR - Remnants - Discussion

#721 Postby AtlanticWind » Sat Jul 08, 2017 6:41 pm

I am a little surprised the NHC made no mention again,I guess the their analysis is that conditions aren't promising.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: FOUR - Remnants - Discussion

#722 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Jul 08, 2017 6:44 pm

AtlanticWind wrote:I am a little surprised the NHC made no mention again,I guess the their analysis is that conditions aren't promising.


we can only assume they have more info than we do... lol

i mean normally for crap that is way way worse than this. they will give it a %0 chance.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: FOUR - Remnants - Discussion

#723 Postby RL3AO » Sat Jul 08, 2017 6:47 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
AtlanticWind wrote:I am a little surprised the NHC made no mention again,I guess the their analysis is that conditions aren't promising.


we can only assume they have more info than we do... lol

i mean normally for crap that is way way worse than this. they will give it a %0 chance.


I didn't even think of that. You'll see them mention an ex-TC with some convection and they'll just say 0% chance. We don't even get that. Oh well.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: FOUR - Remnants - Discussion

#724 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Jul 08, 2017 6:48 pm

RL3AO wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
AtlanticWind wrote:I am a little surprised the NHC made no mention again,I guess the their analysis is that conditions aren't promising.


we can only assume they have more info than we do... lol

i mean normally for crap that is way way worse than this. they will give it a %0 chance.


I didn't even think of that. You'll see them mention an ex-TC with some convection and they'll just say 0% chance. We don't even get that. Oh well.


yeah, its a little odd for sure..
1 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
AtlanticWind
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1889
Age: 66
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 9:57 pm
Location: Plantation,Fla

Re: ATL: FOUR - Remnants - Discussion

#725 Postby AtlanticWind » Sat Jul 08, 2017 6:50 pm

A tropical wave, remnants of Tropical Depression Four, is over
the central Atlantic with its axis extending from 23N57W to
11N59W, moving west-northwest around 15-20 kt. The atmospheric
environment surrounding the wave is very moist as observed in TPW
loop series. Scattered moderate to isolated strong convection is
from 20N-23N between 56W-60W. The active portion of the wave is
forecast to pass to the northeast of the Leeward Islands by Sunday
evening with possible brief gusty winds and squalls. It is later
forecast to approach the SE Bahamas on Monday.

From NHC
1 likes   

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9155
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: ATL: FOUR - Remnants - Discussion

#726 Postby Sciencerocks » Sat Jul 08, 2017 6:53 pm

Don't know if it is at the surface or not but MLC/LLC has moved under the convection and this system appears to be having some redevelopment.

Image
1 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: FOUR - Remnants - Discussion

#727 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Jul 08, 2017 6:54 pm

Sciencerocks wrote:Don't know if it is at the surface or not but MLC/LLC has moved under the convection and this system appears to be having some redevelopment.

Image


yeah, a couple of us have been watching it unfold all day.. its rather interesting...
1 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
AtlanticWind
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1889
Age: 66
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 9:57 pm
Location: Plantation,Fla

Re: ATL: FOUR - Remnants - Discussion

#728 Postby AtlanticWind » Sat Jul 08, 2017 6:55 pm

AtlanticWind wrote:A tropical wave, remnants of Tropical Depression Four, is over
the central Atlantic with its axis extending from 23N57W to
11N59W, moving west-northwest around 15-20 kt. The atmospheric
environment surrounding the wave is very moist as observed in TPW
loop series. Scattered moderate to isolated strong convection is
from 20N-23N between 56W-60W. The active portion of the wave is
forecast to pass to the northeast of the Leeward Islands by Sunday
evening with possible brief gusty winds and squalls. It is later
forecast to approach the SE Bahamas on Monday.

From NHC


From the TWD ,You would think this would be enough for 10 percent chance in the next 5 days
3 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: FOUR - Remnants - Discussion

#729 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Jul 08, 2017 7:00 pm

nah...Dont think its should be mentioned.. only a convective burst the size of South Carolina with a well defined tropical wave and associated llc.. but hey who knows..


Image
1 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

WeatherHoon
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 131
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2016 6:12 am

Re: ATL: FOUR - Remnants - Discussion

#730 Postby WeatherHoon » Sat Jul 08, 2017 7:04 pm

Maybe they want to wait a while to see if it maintains itself.
1 likes   

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9155
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: ATL: FOUR - Remnants - Discussion

#731 Postby Sciencerocks » Sat Jul 08, 2017 7:11 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:nah...Dont think its should be mentioned.. only a convective burst the size of South Carolina with a well defined tropical wave and associated llc.. but hey who knows..


Image


Conditions are only going to get better for it as it moves out of the base of the Tutt ULL to its north. "Within my opinion at least" I'd say close to 40% for the next 72 hours. Models probably will come in stronger if this trend continues.

Gfs 200 milibars upper levels shows a "anti-cyclone" at 24-36 hours pushing the shear to around 23-25 north. So the more southward it remains the better.
http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis ... 0&ypos=342
Last edited by Sciencerocks on Sat Jul 08, 2017 7:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
StormTracker
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2903
Age: 59
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 6:06 am
Location: Quail Heights(Redlands), FL.

Re: ATL: FOUR - Remnants - Discussion

#732 Postby StormTracker » Sat Jul 08, 2017 7:15 pm

I just think they were so quick to label it a depression when they probably should have waited, just to see it dissipate and have to downgrade it to a remnant low, they don't want to jump the gun this time and say anything, especially without major model support, that may make their forecasting ability matters worse...
0 likes   
Something's wrong when you regret, things that haven't happened yet!

User avatar
StormTracker
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2903
Age: 59
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 6:06 am
Location: Quail Heights(Redlands), FL.

Re: ATL: FOUR - Remnants - Discussion

#733 Postby StormTracker » Sat Jul 08, 2017 7:18 pm

As it closes in on PR & DR, they're going to have to put out kind of statement.
0 likes   
Something's wrong when you regret, things that haven't happened yet!

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: FOUR - Remnants - Discussion

#734 Postby RL3AO » Sat Jul 08, 2017 7:18 pm

The models say the vorticity/wave will wash out over the next day or two. Not one GFSE member is on board with a closed low. The models will very likely be correct, but my newly degreed eyes are intrigued this evening.
1 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: FOUR - Remnants - Discussion

#735 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Jul 08, 2017 7:20 pm

Sciencerocks wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:nah...Dont think its should be mentioned.. only a convective burst the size of South Carolina with a well defined tropical wave and associated llc.. but hey who knows..


Image


Conditions are only going to get better for it as it moves out of the base of the Tutt ULL to its north. "Within my opinion at least" I'd say close to 40% for the next 72 hours. Models probably will come in stronger if this trend continues.

Gfs 200 milibars upper levels shows a "anti-cyclone" at 24-36 hours pushing the shear to around 23-25 north. So the more southward it remains the better.
http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis ... 0&ypos=342



yeah.. I was just teasing lol
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: FOUR - Remnants - Discussion

#736 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Jul 08, 2017 7:21 pm

RL3AO wrote:The models say the vorticity/wave will wash out over the next day or two. Not one GFSE member is on board with a closed low. The models will very likely be correct, but my newly degreed eyes are intrigued this evening.


it happens over and over.. when models are completely wrong initially due to data input.. they are only as good as the data that is incorporated.
1 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: FOUR - Remnants - Discussion

#737 Postby gatorcane » Sat Jul 08, 2017 7:22 pm

If the convection blowup now is shear-induced, we would expect the convection to fizzle as it moves away from the TUTT. Pressures are no lower than 1016mb that I can see. Intriguing for sure but my guess is that by the morning EST convection will have fizzled. But you never know... Still think area warrants a mention by NHC as it is Bahamas and possibly Florida-bound with excellent upper-level winds and warm water to work with.
1 likes   

User avatar
boca
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6367
Age: 60
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:49 am
Location: Boca Raton,FL

Re: ATL: FOUR - Remnants - Discussion

#738 Postby boca » Sat Jul 08, 2017 7:26 pm

Can the ULL be producing the uptick in convection and tomorrow just completely fall apart because it's losing the influence of the ULL?
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: FOUR - Remnants - Discussion

#739 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Jul 08, 2017 7:27 pm

gatorcane wrote:If the convection blowup now is shear-induced, we would expect the convection to fizzle as it moves away from the TUTT. Pressures are no lower than 1016mb that I can see. Intriguing for sure but my guess is that by the morning EST convection will have fizzled. But you never know... Still think area warrants a mention by NHC as it is Bahamas and possibly Florida-bound with excellent upper-level winds to work with.


agreed. though if there surface circ becomes well defined and convergence continues it wont need the upper low to produce convection. I think thats what we are all including the NHC is waiting on. can it maintain convection.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Sciencerocks
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9155
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am

Re: ATL: FOUR - Remnants - Discussion

#740 Postby Sciencerocks » Sat Jul 08, 2017 7:28 pm

boca wrote:Can the ULL be producing the uptick in convection and tomorrow just completely fall apart because it's losing the influence of the ULL?


It's possible,but convection over that LLC means more lower level convergence and if it lasts long enough lower pressure. We will have to see of course.

Stronger circulation with more convergence could be enough to tip the balance.
1 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests