ATL: CINDY - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
stormlover2013

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#361 Postby stormlover2013 » Sun Jun 18, 2017 7:37 pm

I remember Humberto, disturbance to hurricane overnight I don't trust anything in the gulf, u never know
0 likes   

caneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1447
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 5:44 am
Location: Clearwater Beach, Fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#362 Postby caneman » Sun Jun 18, 2017 7:37 pm

stormreader wrote:Really not a lover of any particular model. I take each storm on its own terms and weigh info given by major models then. But if this storm makes a Texas landfall, it will definitely be a bummer for the GFS. To post what models were saying last week in the 9 day time frame is not very relevant. As we got to about 7 days or so the Euro started pointing Tex-Mex. GFS was toward Appalachicola. We are in 4-5 day frame now, GFS is where, SE La or so??. If this becomes Texas landfall, GFS will have nothing to brag about. Every storm different brings new variables. Long season ahead. Perhaps the GFS can salvage something here with a landfall in SE La, but I wouldn't count on it.


Please stop with the modeling comparisons. The Euro has also offered several solutions from East Pac. To Mexico to Texas to development, no development, back to development, no development.
Neither has been stellar. That's why we use the NHC blend.
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#363 Postby Alyono » Sun Jun 18, 2017 7:39 pm

not sure I believe the decoupling. We are going to have the system coming under the influence of a ridge, so I am having a hard time buying a scenario with strong enough shear to cause decoupling
2 likes   

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15980
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#364 Postby Kingarabian » Sun Jun 18, 2017 7:43 pm

Alyono wrote:not sure I believe the decoupling. We are going to have the system coming under the influence of a ridge, so I am having a hard time buying a scenario with strong enough shear to cause decoupling


I don't know what then, because it's the 2nd run showing this scenario. And the Euro does not have it all top impressive through most of the course.
0 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

Digital-TC-Chaser

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#365 Postby Digital-TC-Chaser » Sun Jun 18, 2017 7:48 pm

pcolaman wrote:Hasn't even became a depression yet so wouldn't depend on models until we have a storm..

Not that it matters in this basin but be aware it is listed on jtwc as a 35kt storm atm.
93L INVEST 170618 1800 19.0N 87.1W ATL 35 1006
1 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#366 Postby RL3AO » Sun Jun 18, 2017 7:50 pm

You guys, the NHC calling this a tropical cyclone doesn't flip some magic switch in the models to make them work better.
5 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145307
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#367 Postby cycloneye » Sun Jun 18, 2017 7:52 pm

00z Best track:

As of 00:00 UTC Jun 19, 2017:

Location: 19.8°N 87.0°W
Maximum Winds: 35 kt Gusts: N/A
Minimum Central Pressure: 1004 mb
Environmental Pressure: 1008 mb
Radius of Circulation: 240 NM
Radius of Maximum Wind: 200 NM
1 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
mcheer23
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 436
Age: 32
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 8:24 pm
Location: Sugar Land, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#368 Postby mcheer23 » Sun Jun 18, 2017 7:54 pm

00z Models shift west.
1 likes   

Digital-TC-Chaser

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#369 Postby Digital-TC-Chaser » Sun Jun 18, 2017 7:57 pm

The models do however get a better grasp on a organised low with steering.
Weak nothings tend to be erratic.
0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15446
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#370 Postby NDG » Sun Jun 18, 2017 7:58 pm

Good example of how the Euro has been over doing the ridging across the north central gulf coast, this is why it will continue to trend towards a landfall of northern TX coast of SW LA as we get closer in time, IMO.

Image
2 likes   

User avatar
TeamPlayersBlue
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3445
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:44 am
Location: Denver/Applewood, CO

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#371 Postby TeamPlayersBlue » Sun Jun 18, 2017 8:09 pm

Wow. That best track aint too shabby.
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

floridasun78
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: miami fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#372 Postby floridasun78 » Sun Jun 18, 2017 8:14 pm

it rainy good here from 93l outer band in miami tonight
1 likes   

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#373 Postby Hammy » Sun Jun 18, 2017 8:14 pm

cycloneye wrote:00z Best track:

As of 00:00 UTC Jun 19, 2017:

Location: 19.8°N 87.0°W
Maximum Winds: 35 kt Gusts: N/A
Minimum Central Pressure: 1004 mb
Environmental Pressure: 1008 mb
Radius of Circulation: 240 NM
Radius of Maximum Wind: 200 NM


So directly to TS if this can manage to organize at some point.
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

stormreader

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#374 Postby stormreader » Sun Jun 18, 2017 8:26 pm

NDG wrote:Good example of how the Euro has been over doing the ridging across the north central gulf coast, this is why it will continue to trend towards a landfall of northern TX coast of SW LA as we get closer in time, IMO.

Image

May be right. About 36 hours or so ago we started to see hints from the western assortment of models of a possible run north during the later period toward the upper Texas coast. This is why I always included the Tex-La border as a possibility to be included with the Texas landfall scenario.
1 likes   

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#375 Postby Hammy » Sun Jun 18, 2017 8:28 pm

:uarrow: Wow, the Euro has not done well with the steering pattern beyond a few days. Has the parallel done any better?
1 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145307
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#376 Postby cycloneye » Sun Jun 18, 2017 8:30 pm

0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15446
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#377 Postby NDG » Sun Jun 18, 2017 8:35 pm

H85 vorticity getting better defined little by little.

Image
1 likes   

User avatar
TropicalAnalystwx13
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2109
Age: 27
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:20 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#378 Postby TropicalAnalystwx13 » Sun Jun 18, 2017 8:42 pm

It'll be interesting to see how the system develops in the Gulf of Mexico with proximity to the upper-level low farther west. We may be dealing with something that looks like Lee, with an exposed circulation and all weather north and east of the center--something that could border on being subtropical. I tend to favor the northwestern Gulf (Texas/Louisiana) as a landfall point, since models have slowed the system down over coming days. That should allow more time for the East Coast trough to lift out and ridging to develop, forcing 93L on a west-northwest track after initially moving north. Regardless, it'll be a typical June storm--messy, short-lived, with heavy rainfall as the main threat.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#379 Postby Hammy » Sun Jun 18, 2017 8:46 pm

Vorticity location could support something closer to the GFS (over the Euro) track.
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#380 Postby gatorcane » Sun Jun 18, 2017 8:47 pm

The upper trough over the NW Gulf seems to have gone stationary again. Tough for this system to move west into that.

Image
1 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests