errors are around 175 miles at day 4 and 230 miles at day 5.
Therefore, it is too soon to rule out possible hurricane impacts
from Matthew in Florida.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
SouthernBreeze wrote:right now slow is great!
TheStormExpert wrote:With the track gradually shifting further east with every new advisory every six hours you have to wonder why they still mention this?It is important to remind users that average NHC track forecast
errors are around 175 miles at day 4 and 230 miles at day 5.
Therefore, it is too soon to rule out possible hurricane impacts
from Matthew in Florida.
Blown Away wrote:NHC 5pm Disco they hinted some confidence in long term track and the 11pm back to low confidence... My amateur assessment seems to think things have become more clear today...
ozonepete wrote:AutoPenalti wrote:Would this impede the models in any way? This thing looks massive.
Don't think so. As I posted earlier, I've seen this before in the northwest Pacific with super typhoons and it eventually gets absorbed or fades away. And during the time it was there the models didn't really change in their forecasts. The only thing I do remember was that it impeded strengthening while it was still sizeable.
TheStormExpert wrote:Blown Away wrote:NHC 5pm Disco they hinted some confidence in long term track and the 11pm back to low confidence... My amateur assessment seems to think things have become more clear today...
Yep, I'd personally say that Florida dodged yet another bullet.
They must have forgotten to take out that last paragraph in the 11pm discussion.
otowntiger wrote:
Wow! That is very strange.
vbhoutex wrote:ozonepete wrote:AutoPenalti wrote:Would this impede the models in any way? This thing looks massive.
Don't think so. As I posted earlier, I've seen this before in the northwest Pacific with super typhoons and it eventually gets absorbed or fades away. And during the time it was there the models didn't really change in their forecasts. The only thing I do remember was that it impeded strengthening while it was still sizeable.
IIRC when I have seen this in the ATL Basin it seems to portend a turn, usually sharp, somewhere near that direction or at least an almost stop and then turn almost 90 degrees toward it and that does seem to be possible now. Still not definitive though. Still find it very strange that Matthew has been having this "tag along" huge convective area for so long and somehow managed to continue with his RI unimpeded. Anyone care to comment on that?
TheStormExpert wrote:Blown Away wrote:NHC 5pm Disco they hinted some confidence in long term track and the 11pm back to low confidence... My amateur assessment seems to think things have become more clear today...
Yep, I'd personally say that Florida dodged yet another bullet.
They must have forgotten to take out that last paragraph in the 11pm discussion.
vbhoutex wrote:ozonepete wrote:AutoPenalti wrote:Would this impede the models in any way? This thing looks massive.
Don't think so. As I posted earlier, I've seen this before in the northwest Pacific with super typhoons and it eventually gets absorbed or fades away. And during the time it was there the models didn't really change in their forecasts. The only thing I do remember was that it impeded strengthening while it was still sizeable.
IIRC when I have seen this in the ATL Basin it seems to portend a turn, usually sharp, somewhere near that direction or at least an almost stop and then turn almost 90 degrees toward it and that does seem to be possible now. Still not definitive though. Still find it very strange that Matthew has been having this "tag along" huge convective area for so long and somehow managed to continue with his RI unimpeded. Anyone care to comment on that?
AtlanticWind wrote:Looks like he took a little jog west on sat loop
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests