
ATL: MATTHEW - Models
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- gatorcane
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 23693
- Age: 47
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
- Location: Boca Raton, FL
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
00Z guidance. BAMD into South Florida and noticeable NW bend with several models


0 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
SouthFLTropics wrote:Hypercane_Kyle wrote:What's highly concerning to me is that the ECMWF/GFS/HWRF/UKMET don't show Matthew at peak now, rather they show Matthew peaking as it makes landfall in Cuba or in the Bahamas.
I think you just made an excellent point though that should be somewhat comforting...models can and will be wrong. They didn't show this strength whereas they could be just as wrong with the high strength in the Bahamas. It could end up weaker, especially after impacting Cuba.
It's true. Landfall ( maybe two) before nearing Fl, it might not have the same intensity. But in general I think a minimum intensity of about 120 mph should be expected.
1 likes
- DESTRUCTION5
- Category 5
- Posts: 4423
- Age: 43
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
- Location: Stuart, FL
- CalmBeforeStorm
- Category 2
- Posts: 600
- Age: 72
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 7:55 pm
- Location: Stuart, Florida
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
DESTRUCTION5 wrote:wxman57 wrote:meriland23 wrote:I have a very good question about intensity. What are the chances Matthew will gradually weaken consistently after that north turn/ pass over Cuba.. making it a low cat 2, cat 1 or remnants by the time (and if) it hits the US? I question this because almost all of the models indicate the weakening will be short lived before strengthening again while the NHC thinks it'll die off when it weakens.
Interaction with land will have 2 major impacts on Matthew. First, the core will be severely disrupted, resulting in a significant drop in intensity. Second, the wind field will expand considerably, perhaps to twice the size south of Cuba. After the wind field expansion it may take a while to regain its core and intensify. Think Ike in 2008. It never could get its core going before landfall after passing over Cuba twice. It was getting pretty close, though, as it moved over us.
I looked at the 12Z EC ensembles and it appears that the operational run is an outlier. Most of the 50 ensemble members take Matthew out to sea to the northeast. I don't believe the 12Z EC, but I do think that Matthew may pass close enough to the Carolinas to brush them with TS winds, particularly since its wind field will be much larger by then.
I see your not buying the Euro...But I don't see you commenting on the GFS getting closer in yet again?
I see 57 not acknowledging a threat to our location and yet here is the super consistent GFS model trending west and now with a position, what, maybe 140 miles from Florida? Can't for the life of me see how this doesn't constitute a threat.
0 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
DESTRUCTION5 wrote:00z models show the westward jog...
http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/storminf ... latest.png
Doesn't look too good for the Carolinas

0 likes
- centuryv58
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 233
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2016 1:24 pm
- Location: Southeast Florida
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
CalmBeforeStorm wrote:DESTRUCTION5 wrote:wxman57 wrote:
Interaction with land will have 2 major impacts on Matthew. First, the core will be severely disrupted, resulting in a significant drop in intensity. Second, the wind field will expand considerably, perhaps to twice the size south of Cuba. After the wind field expansion it may take a while to regain its core and intensify. Think Ike in 2008. It never could get its core going before landfall after passing over Cuba twice. It was getting pretty close, though, as it moved over us.
I looked at the 12Z EC ensembles and it appears that the operational run is an outlier. Most of the 50 ensemble members take Matthew out to sea to the northeast. I don't believe the 12Z EC, but I do think that Matthew may pass close enough to the Carolinas to brush them with TS winds, particularly since its wind field will be much larger by then.
I see your not buying the Euro...But I don't see you commenting on the GFS getting closer in yet again?
I see 57 not acknowledging a threat to our location and yet here is the super consistent GFS model trending west and now with a position, what, maybe 140 miles from Florida? Can't for the life of me see how this doesn't constitute a threat.
I believe this may be an older post before the latest model runs? As has been repeated endlessly,. FL is not our of the woods.
Last edited by centuryv58 on Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- ConvergenceZone
- Category 5
- Posts: 5201
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
- Location: Northern California
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
I'm surprised that meteorologist wxman feels pretty confident that this is still going to go out to sea. I felt that way yesterday but not so confident in that today after seeing the slow model migration westward.
0 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
pgoss11 wrote:DESTRUCTION5 wrote:00z models show the westward jog...
http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/storminf ... latest.png
Doesn't look too good for the Carolinas
Just hope it makes the NE turn.
0 likes
- Hurricaneman
- Category 5
- Posts: 7391
- Age: 45
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
- Location: central florida
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
pgoss11 wrote:DESTRUCTION5 wrote:00z models show the westward jog...
http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/storminf ... latest.png
Doesn't look too good for the Carolinas
Or Florida for that matter, could this be a triple US landfall possibility
0 likes
- CalmBeforeStorm
- Category 2
- Posts: 600
- Age: 72
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 7:55 pm
- Location: Stuart, Florida
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
ConvergenceZone wrote:I'm surprised that meteorologist wxman feels pretty confident that this is still going to go out to sea. I felt that way yesterday but not so confident in that today after seeing the slow model migration westward.
The westward trend of the model consensus has been steady now for at least three days including the latest 00z. Until I see that move east I will be very concerned here on the east coast of Florida.
2 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
adam0983 wrote:The Euro runs should be interesting I expect a west shift at 11pm
1 likes
-
- Category 4
- Posts: 907
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 3:21 am
- Location: Ozark, AL
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
0 likes
- p1nheadlarry
- Category 2
- Posts: 672
- Age: 33
- Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 2:42 pm
- Location: SR County FL
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
pgoss11 wrote:DESTRUCTION5 wrote:00z models show the westward jog...
http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/storminf ... latest.png
Doesn't look too good for the Carolinas
The westward jogs have me watching very closely, but I'm thinking climo trough should push it out before it hits, however late to the party it may be. Could this be anomalous like Hazel or Sandy? Sure I guess.
0 likes
--;->#GoNoles--;->.
- SouthernBreeze
- Category 1
- Posts: 284
- Age: 68
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:54 pm
- Location: SC/NC line- on the SC Coast
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
Wow, those are some high gusts! I'm hoping thats gusts & not sustained!
0 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
ConvergenceZone wrote:I'm surprised that meteorologist wxman feels pretty confident that this is still going to go out to sea. I felt that way yesterday but not so confident in that today after seeing the slow model migration westward.
Wxman57 noted that's what the majority of EC ensembles suggested, he didn't specifically note that it was going out to sea. He was giving his interpretation of what a cluster of guidance was showing.
2 likes
The above post and any post by Ntxw is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including Storm2k. For official information, please refer to NWS products.
- SouthFLTropics
- Category 5
- Posts: 4239
- Age: 50
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
- Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
DESTRUCTION5 wrote:00z models show the westward jog...
http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/storminf ... latest.png
BAMD is worst case scenario for South Florida. Would put entire metropolitan South Florida in the East Quad.
0 likes
Fourth Generation Florida Native
Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24
Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6358
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
- Location: Miramar Bch. FL
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
I'm not convinced this goes OTS, latest GFS has a much weaker trough off the New England Coast by Oct.5th and the Trough in the upper plains further north looking more like the energy there heads up into Canada. I think there is a real possibility that ridging builds back from the Atlantic back into the Mid-Atlantic to New England and Mathew gets trapped.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6358
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
- Location: Miramar Bch. FL
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
Dean4Storms wrote:I'm not convinced this goes OTS, latest GFS has a much weaker trough off the New England Coast by Oct.5th and the Trough in the upper plains further north looking more like the energy there heads up into Canada. I think there is a real possibility that ridging builds back from the Atlantic back into the Mid-Atlantic to New England and Mathew gets trapped.
I think the 12z ECM Operational is onto something with that!
0 likes
- ConvergenceZone
- Category 5
- Posts: 5201
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
- Location: Northern California
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
Ntxw wrote:ConvergenceZone wrote:I'm surprised that meteorologist wxman feels pretty confident that this is still going to go out to sea. I felt that way yesterday but not so confident in that today after seeing the slow model migration westward.
Wxman57 noted that's what the majority of EC ensembles suggested, he didn't specifically note that it was going out to sea. He was giving his interpretation of what a cluster of guidance was showing.
Yea but I'm pretty sure he said that the Carolinas should tropical storm(not hurricane force winds) which leads me to believe he expects it to stay off shore
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests