ATL: MATTHEW - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 42
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2301 Postby Hammy » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:23 pm

They could issue a position update if they decide to upgrade, similar to what they did when it reached hurricane intensity.
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
1900hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6059
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2302 Postby 1900hurricane » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:23 pm

Anxiously awaiting the center dropsonde and VDM.
0 likes   
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.

Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/

User avatar
tropicwatch
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3394
Age: 61
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:01 am
Location: Panama City Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2303 Postby tropicwatch » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:23 pm

Hypercane_Kyle wrote:!!!!!

SFMR:

143 knots
(~ 164.6 mph)


That wind measurement was flagged.
0 likes   
Tropicwatch


Agnes 72', Eloise 75, Elena 85', Kate 85', Charley 86', Florence 88', Beryl 94', Dean 95', Erin 95', Opal 95', Earl 98', Georges 98', Ivan 2004', Arlene 2005', Dennis 2005', Ida 2009' Debby 2012' Irma 2017' Michael 2018'

User avatar
Ntxw
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 22792
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: DFW, Texas

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2304 Postby Ntxw » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:23 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:
Nate-Gillson wrote:
Hypercane_Kyle wrote:!!!!!

SFMR:

143 knots
(~ 164.6 mph)


Matthew is just EXPLODING!!! However, there is NOOOOO WAY it's going to pull a Patricia (not even close). :P


You just never know. If we had continuous Recon in Patricia, who knows what we would have found as it was on its way up. But there is no indication the CDG is going to wrap all the way around (something I have never seen in the Atlantic).


The pressure gradient in Patricia was also out of this world too. The convection was a lot colder. For an Atlantic storm though this is about as good as it gets. No doubt Cat 5 soon.
1 likes   
The above post and any post by Ntxw is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including Storm2k. For official information, please refer to NWS products.

  Help support Storm2K!
Help Support Storm2K

NotoSans
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1380
Age: 25
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2015 1:15 am
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2305 Postby NotoSans » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:23 pm

Center dropsonde says 943 (945 mb with 20 kt surface winds).
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC and NWS products.

SunnyThoughts
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2263
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: Pensacola, Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2306 Postby SunnyThoughts » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:24 pm

REcon should stay in the storm until the next update...they will make a couple more passes and if it warrants a cat 5 upgrade, Im sure they will at the next update.
0 likes   

User avatar
1900hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6059
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2307 Postby 1900hurricane » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:24 pm

Nate-Gillson wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:
Nate-Gillson wrote:
Matthew is just EXPLODING!!! However, there is NOOOOO WAY it's going to pull a Patricia (not even close). :P


You just never know. If we had continuous Recon in Patricia, who knows what we would have found as it was on its way up. But there is no indication the CDG is going to wrap all the way around (something I have never seen in the Atlantic).


Silly question, but what does CDG stand for?

CDG is cold dark grey, the coldest IR temp breakpoint on the BD enhanced IR. The cold dark grey shade is temps -81*C and colder.
0 likes   
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.

Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/

MaineWeatherNut
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:06 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2308 Postby MaineWeatherNut » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:25 pm

Still no sign of a Secondary Wind Maxima. So no ERC on the Horizon.
0 likes   
The content of this post does NOT constitute official forecast and should not be used as such. They are the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or Storm2K. For official information, please refer to the local meteorological centers of respective areas.

Nate-Gillson
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 133
Age: 39
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 8:27 pm
Location: Cedar Rapids, Iowa

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2309 Postby Nate-Gillson » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:26 pm

1900hurricane wrote:
Nate-Gillson wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:
You just never know. If we had continuous Recon in Patricia, who knows what we would have found as it was on its way up. But there is no indication the CDG is going to wrap all the way around (something I have never seen in the Atlantic).


Silly question, but what does CDG stand for?

CDG is cold dark grey, the coldest IR temp breakpoint on the BD enhanced IR.


Oh ok. Also, just found out that the absurd SFMR reading was flagged.
0 likes   

tatertawt24
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 309
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 12:57 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2310 Postby tatertawt24 » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:26 pm

If they upgrade, would this be the highest pressure for a cat 5 ever? The only one I can think of that might have it beat would be Felix...
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
TheAustinMan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1047
Age: 25
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 4:26 pm
Location: United States
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2311 Postby TheAustinMan » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:27 pm

panamatropicwatch wrote:
Hypercane_Kyle wrote:!!!!!

SFMR:

143 knots
(~ 164.6 mph)


That wind measurement was flagged.


The 143kt HDOB reading has a flag code of "01" which means possibly suspect temperature/dew point readings, but does not flag the SFMR estimate.
0 likes   
ImageImageImage
Treat my opinions with a grain of salt. For official information see your local weather service.

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2312 Postby CrazyC83 » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:28 pm

tatertawt24 wrote:If they upgrade, would this be the highest pressure for a cat 5 ever? The only one I can think of that might have it beat would be Felix...


I believe it would be, at least for one that was reliably measured. I might be a bit hesitant to upgrade right now for that reason, but Felix was 939 with 140 kt winds and 934 with 150 kt winds...

Typically pressures are higher in the deep tropics especially in the vicinity of a ridge.
Last edited by CrazyC83 on Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   

TimeZone

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2313 Postby TimeZone » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:28 pm

Likely supports an intensity of at least 155 MPH.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hypercane_Kyle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3357
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2314 Postby Hypercane_Kyle » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:28 pm

Nate-Gillson wrote:
1900hurricane wrote:
Nate-Gillson wrote:
Silly question, but what does CDG stand for?

CDG is cold dark grey, the coldest IR temp breakpoint on the BD enhanced IR.


Oh ok. Also, just found out that the absurd SFMR reading was flagged.


Not all of them were flagged.
0 likes   
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.

User avatar
abajan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4237
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 5:10 am
Location: Barbados

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2315 Postby abajan » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:30 pm

Cyclenall wrote:
Hammy wrote:How likely is Cat 5 by morning at this rate?

... I can't believe its been 9 years since the Atlantic had a CAT5...that's just mind-blowing. The basin has been turned off for so long now ...

Actually, if it were to make it to Cat 5, that would be better than average, because Cat 5s are rare and happen only once per decade on average. (At least. that's what I read sometime ago.) It's just that so many of them have occurred since the start of the active Atlantic hurricane cycle began in the '90s, that we think it;s normal to have them every couple of years.
0 likes   

User avatar
WmE
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 696
Age: 36
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:23 am
Location: Vienna, Austria

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2316 Postby WmE » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:30 pm

tatertawt24 wrote:If they upgrade, would this be the highest pressure for a cat 5 ever? The only one I can think of that might have it beat would be Felix...


Highest pressure for a Category 5 ever was Edith 1971 with 943 mbar.
0 likes   

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5902
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2317 Postby MGC » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:31 pm

Pressure is kind of high for this to be a CAT-5, also the satellite IR image don't have a solid donut of cold cloud tops yet....so, I don't think Matthew is a 5 yet. It is quite possible and somewhat likely that Matthew could obtain that intensity though.....MGC
1 likes   

User avatar
Hypercane_Kyle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3357
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2318 Postby Hypercane_Kyle » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:31 pm

tatertawt24 wrote:If they upgrade, would this be the highest pressure for a cat 5 ever? The only one I can think of that might have it beat would be Felix...


For the Atlantic the highest one I can see is Hurricane Edith (1971) at 943mb. Gustav was close to a Category 5 at a similar MSLP.
0 likes   
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.

NotoSans
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1380
Age: 25
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2015 1:15 am
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2319 Postby NotoSans » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:31 pm

It appears that NHC goes with 135 kt.

AL, 14, 2016100100, , BEST, 0, 134N, 720W, 135, 943, HU, 34, NEQ, 180, 60, 50, 170, 1007, 160, 10, 0, 15, L, 0, , 0, 0, MATTHEW, D, 0, , 0, 0, 0, 0, genesis-num, 024,
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC and NWS products.

User avatar
Ntxw
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 22792
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: DFW, Texas

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2320 Postby Ntxw » Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:31 pm

If it's eye can warm a little more. I think that's a factor from making it a clear cut cat 5 right now, not quite the perfect eye yet.

Image
0 likes   
The above post and any post by Ntxw is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including Storm2k. For official information, please refer to NWS products.



  Help support Storm2K!

Help Support Storm2K



Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 3 guests