ATL: MATTHEW - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
terstorm1012
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1314
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:36 pm
Location: Millersburg, PA

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2101 Postby terstorm1012 » Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:53 pm

Soonercane wrote:I know someone flying into Kingston tomorrow and staying until Tuesday. What kind of impacts will they experience there most likely (obviously it depends on the track)?



I personally would cancel my trip. I really think this will directly strike Jamaica, probably around Kingston, on Monday.
0 likes   
my posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just my opinion (to which I welcome challenges!) and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2102 Postby KWT » Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:53 pm

wxmann_91 wrote:5 PM advisory has this at 120 kt. Cat 4. Hurricane Watch up for Jamaica.


I think they had no choice but to go to 120kts from those dropsonde reports. Those winds a little higher up will probably be brought down further before tomorrow morning I think, esp at D-max.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2103 Postby Alyono » Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:53 pm

"After 12 hours, a
gradual weakening is shown, following the trend of, but above nearly
all of the intensity guidance."

This from the TCD is NOT accurate. They basically rejected all global model output, which shows a significantly stronger storm on Monday than today
2 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2104 Postby Alyono » Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:54 pm

Soonercane wrote:I know someone flying into Kingston tomorrow and staying until Tuesday. What kind of impacts will they experience there most likely (obviously it depends on the track)?


if it hits Kingston directly, the city likely would be destroyed
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2105 Postby KWT » Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:54 pm

Cycloneye, the key thing to note IMO is the east bend that was on the previous run is now gone, this is to reflect some of the models suggesting a bend back to the NNW.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

jdjaguar
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 551
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: Jacksonville Beach, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2106 Postby jdjaguar » Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:55 pm

Soonercane wrote:I know someone flying into Kingston tomorrow and staying until Tuesday. What kind of impacts will they experience there most likely (obviously it depends on the track)?

tell that someone to cancel trip
1 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15448
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2107 Postby NDG » Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:55 pm

KWT wrote:
Ntxw wrote:Image


Really looking great now, going to make a run at category-5 that is for sure, looking closer and closer to what Felix did near this location in 2007...


I have been mentioning Felix all day long, I think the proximity to S.A. helped both of these systems staying away from the more diverging low level jet closer to Hispaniola.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2108 Postby wxmann_91 » Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:55 pm

Soonercane wrote:I know someone flying into Kingston tomorrow and staying until Tuesday. What kind of impacts will they experience there most likely (obviously it depends on the track)?

Would probably not go. Flight could be cancelled, given there is already a hurricane watch up and would most likely be upgraded to a warning by tomorrow.
0 likes   

User avatar
p1nheadlarry
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 672
Age: 33
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 2:42 pm
Location: SR County FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2109 Postby p1nheadlarry » Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:55 pm

Given the lack of skill of the intensity guidance
thus far, this remains a low confidence forecast, and its possible
this could be conservative.


Is that right
0 likes   
--;->#GoNoles--;->.

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2110 Postby KWT » Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:56 pm

Soonercane wrote:I know someone flying into Kingston tomorrow and staying until Tuesday. What kind of impacts will they experience there most likely (obviously it depends on the track)?


Doesn't really need thinking about, probably going to be some major damage if this is as strong as the models predict...and indeed it seems the models are somewhat too weak at the moment.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
Hypercane_Kyle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3355
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2111 Postby Hypercane_Kyle » Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:57 pm

To provide some additional perspective, the last Cat. 4 to develop in the Caribbean was Hurricane Paloma* in 2008, 8 years ago.
Last edited by Hypercane_Kyle on Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.

otowntiger
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1921
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:06 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2112 Postby otowntiger » Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:57 pm

SFLcane wrote:New track slight bend to the west
looks straight north to me.
0 likes   

MaineWeatherNut
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:06 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2113 Postby MaineWeatherNut » Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:57 pm

Why would the NHC show this weakening after 12 hours when in roughly 36 hours the environment is supposed to be even more conducive to strengthening?
1 likes   
The content of this post does NOT constitute official forecast and should not be used as such. They are the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or Storm2K. For official information, please refer to the local meteorological centers of respective areas.

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2114 Postby Alyono » Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:58 pm

MaineWeatherNut wrote:Why would the NHC show this weakening after 12 hours when in roughly 36 hours the environment is supposed to be even more conducive to strengthening?


Because DSHP and LGEM say so

I wouldn't be surprised if what really happens is this weakens, perhaps to cat 2 late tomorrow, then becomes a cat 5 by the time it hits Jamaica
Last edited by Alyono on Fri Sep 30, 2016 4:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Weatherboy1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1189
Age: 49
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 1:50 pm
Location: Jupiter/Sarasota, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2115 Postby Weatherboy1 » Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:59 pm

Well, a 140-mph hurricane is nothing to mess around with. But still just cautiously watching here in South FL, rather than worrying too much. If modeling continues to shift west overnight though, then it's time to hit up Publix before the masses do! :)
3 likes   

psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4769
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2116 Postby psyclone » Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:59 pm

Slower and slightly west. rinse and repeat over a few forecast cycles and things change for florida east coasters big time. long days and nights ahead..
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2117 Postby KWT » Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:59 pm

MaineWeatherNut wrote:Why would the NHC show this weakening after 12 hours when in roughly 36 hours the environment is supposed to be even more conducive to strengthening?


They are following some of the models which suggests a slight weakening occurring - though I think they are very much behind the curve with this one, they are still using the same reasoning they were when they forecasted it to stay nearly static in strength, which REALLY busted badly.
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
centuryv58
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 233
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2016 1:24 pm
Location: Southeast Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2118 Postby centuryv58 » Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:59 pm

"Therefore, it is too soon to rule out possible hurricane impacts from Matthew in Florida." says NHC at 5pm.
0 likes   

MaineWeatherNut
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 225
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:06 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2119 Postby MaineWeatherNut » Fri Sep 30, 2016 4:00 pm

Alyono wrote:
MaineWeatherNut wrote:Why would the NHC show this weakening after 12 hours when in roughly 36 hours the environment is supposed to be even more conducive to strengthening?


Because DSHP and LGEM say so


lol pretty poor reasoning if you ask me. When you look at what is happening right now and the environment and heat content a head of it you kind of have to accept the fact that the models have no idea what's going on and put your scientist hats on instead of hugging to the Models so tightly in fear of being wrong...
0 likes   
The content of this post does NOT constitute official forecast and should not be used as such. They are the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or Storm2K. For official information, please refer to the local meteorological centers of respective areas.

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23692
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#2120 Postby gatorcane » Fri Sep 30, 2016 4:00 pm

NHC snippet:

The NHC forecast is near the middle of the
guidance envelope and is a little to the east of the multi-model
consensus at days 4 and 5.


The West edge of the cone could not get any closer to SE Florida without SE Florida being in the cone. I wonder if being a little east was so that SE Florida was not included intentionally?
Last edited by gatorcane on Fri Sep 30, 2016 4:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
2 likes   


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests