ATL: MATTHEW - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 16169
Age: 27
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1961 Postby Yellow Evan » Fri Sep 30, 2016 2:23 pm

ronyan wrote:Maybe some good news. If it has a pinhole eye those don't tend to last very long before EWRC begins.


Yes, but the RMW would be much larger.
1 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11504
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1962 Postby GCANE » Fri Sep 30, 2016 2:23 pm

Not making the turn yet and about 5hrs fast

Image
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1963 Postby RL3AO » Fri Sep 30, 2016 2:25 pm

Michele B wrote:OK, so I pulled this graphic up:

https://earth.nullschool.net/#current/w ... 719,35.853

From the looks of it, the "strong trough" that's supposed to pick this thing up (now located over KY? Cause I don't see anything strong enough out in the Rockies). The one over KY looks like it only dives down as far south as GA, and not very strong....

So am I wrong to think this graphic could show me the future steering currents for Matt?


The link you gave is looking near the surface (1000 mb). That won't show steering. You could use 500 mb (hPa) and go forward with that site to see what the GFS shows.
1 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20012
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1964 Postby tolakram » Fri Sep 30, 2016 2:26 pm

0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1965 Postby Aric Dunn » Fri Sep 30, 2016 2:26 pm

GCANE wrote:Not making the turn yet and about 5hrs fast

Image


yeah its been south and faster since its development. they have to adjust every package.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2081
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1966 Postby Blinhart » Fri Sep 30, 2016 2:27 pm

I have no doubt that this system will do totally different than what everyone expects as all systems have done all year. I can see this system getting up to around 190 mph if not stronger if it decides to stay away from land a little longer.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 16169
Age: 27
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1967 Postby Yellow Evan » Fri Sep 30, 2016 2:27 pm

----- Current Analysis -----
Date : 30 SEP 2016 Time : 181500 UTC
Lat : 13:27:34 N Lon : 71:15:33 W


CI# /Pressure/ Vmax
5.3 / 962.2mb/ 97.2kt


Final T# Adj T# Raw T#
5.3 6.1 6.5

Estimated radius of max. wind based on IR :<10 km

Center Temp : -20.4C Cloud Region Temp : -72.5C

Scene Type : PINHOLE EYE
0 likes   

User avatar
baitism
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 266
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 3:00 pm
Location: Overland Park, KS

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1968 Postby baitism » Fri Sep 30, 2016 2:29 pm

Does anyone have the link to the local radar near Matthew? I was at work and didn't get a chance to bookmark it earlier. Thanks.
0 likes   

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 16169
Age: 27
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1969 Postby Yellow Evan » Fri Sep 30, 2016 2:29 pm

TXNT24 KNES 301801
TCSNTL

A. 14L (MATTHEW)

B. 30/1745Z

C. 13.5N

D. 71.3W

E. ONE/GOES-E

F. T5.5/5.5/D2.5/24HRS

G. IR/EIR/VIS

H. REMARKS...DT=5.5 BASED ON BL EMBEDDED GRAY SHADE WITH MG EYE
SURROUNDED BY WH. PT=5.0. MET=4.5. FT IS BASED ON DT.

I. ADDL POSITIONS

NIL


...SCHWARTZ
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1970 Postby Aric Dunn » Fri Sep 30, 2016 2:30 pm

check the flow out a head of on the western carrib. still very strong ene to wsw flow all the way to central America ... ridging to the north is still very pronounced dont expect a turn for another 24 plus hours.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/tatl/loop-rgb.html
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Michele B
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1114
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:08 am
Location: SWFL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1971 Postby Michele B » Fri Sep 30, 2016 2:32 pm

RL3AO wrote:
Michele B wrote:OK, so I pulled this graphic up:

https://earth.nullschool.net/#current/w ... 719,35.853

From the looks of it, the "strong trough" that's supposed to pick this thing up (now located over KY? Cause I don't see anything strong enough out in the Rockies). The one over KY looks like it only dives down as far south as GA, and not very strong....

So am I wrong to think this graphic could show me the future steering currents for Matt?


The link you gave is looking near the surface (1000 mb). That won't show steering. You could use 500 mb (hPa) and go forward with that site to see what the GFS shows.


Oh, WOW! I did put in 500mb and it's an awesome shot!

Thanks for the tip. Still not sure it tells me what I was looking for, but it definitely shows a stronger steering element in the upper atmosphere. Both in the eastern CONUS, and out west later in the week.
0 likes   
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022

User avatar
mcheer23
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 436
Age: 32
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 8:24 pm
Location: Sugar Land, Texas

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1972 Postby mcheer23 » Fri Sep 30, 2016 2:33 pm

Blinhart wrote:I have no doubt that this system will do totally different than what everyone expects as all systems have done all year. I can see this system getting up to around 190 mph if not stronger if it decides to stay away from land a little longer.


Nah.
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5315
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1973 Postby Nimbus » Fri Sep 30, 2016 2:34 pm

Storms with pinhole eyes can ramp up fast like that.
Not sure the intensity in this case will effect the upper air environment via pumping the subtropical ridging. Might tend to follow the deep layer BAM rather than the Medium though and of course the outflow and smaller core resists shear better..

If this gets far enough west before the eyewall replacement cycle shear might knock it down, these storms are more vulnerable to shear during the EWRC.
0 likes   

User avatar
TheDreamTraveler
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 641
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 3:10 am
Location: PA

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1974 Postby TheDreamTraveler » Fri Sep 30, 2016 2:37 pm

The most impressive thing to me is how this thing has managed to hold its own and kind of create its own environment to allow it to strengthen and keep strengthening with the shear that's been in front of it. Remember this thing was a naked swirl only 36 hours ago. Amazing transformation. And that pinhole eye is looking even better as we speak.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1975 Postby RL3AO » Fri Sep 30, 2016 2:38 pm

Michele B wrote:
Thanks for the tip. Still not sure it tells me what I was looking for, but it definitely shows a stronger steering element in the upper atmosphere. Both in the eastern CONUS, and out west later in the week.


My favorite thing I like to show people on that website is the polar vortex. If you go to 10 hPa and look over the South Pole, you can really see it in action.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1976 Postby KWT » Fri Sep 30, 2016 2:40 pm

Yellow Evan wrote:
ronyan wrote:Maybe some good news. If it has a pinhole eye those don't tend to last very long before EWRC begins.


Yes, but the RMW would be much larger.


Yep, land will also probably help to spread this system out further and I'd imagine in the Bahamas this will be quite a large system. Still losing latitude, lets see what the NHC does in the next hour, think they are going to have to bend that track in the latter part of the run back to due north to reflect the uncertainty at that point.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

BobHarlem
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2174
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:11 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1977 Postby BobHarlem » Fri Sep 30, 2016 2:41 pm

New vortex at 954mb (Drop From the 2PM advisory at 960mb)
0 likes   

User avatar
Cunxi Huang
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 329
Age: 27
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 12:17 pm
Location: San Jose, CA
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1978 Postby Cunxi Huang » Fri Sep 30, 2016 2:45 pm

BobHarlem wrote:New vortex at 954mb (Drop From the 2PM advisory at 960mb)

that's EXTRAP which means it's an estimation...
0 likes   
06 SuTY SAOMAI | 09 TY LINFA | 10 TY FANAPI | 10 SuTY MEGI | 16 SuTY MERANTI | 19 SuTY LEKIMA | 24 C2 FRANCINE
DO NOT use my posts for life and death decisions. For official information, please refer to products from your RSMC and national weather agency.

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 16169
Age: 27
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1979 Postby Yellow Evan » Fri Sep 30, 2016 2:45 pm

Image

T6.0. OW eye surrounded by W embedded in B.
Last edited by Yellow Evan on Fri Sep 30, 2016 2:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
1900hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6059
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1980 Postby 1900hurricane » Fri Sep 30, 2016 2:46 pm

The eye is beginning to break off-white as of 1915Z.

Image
0 likes   
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.

Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests