Alyono wrote:why do I get the feeling that the 4km NAM uses paramaterized convetion...
If it does, the model should have its computer code erased as it is beyond non physical
Erm...what does that mean?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Alyono wrote:why do I get the feeling that the 4km NAM uses paramaterized convetion...
If it does, the model should have its computer code erased as it is beyond non physical
drewschmaltz wrote:Recurve wrote:If I'm getting it right, HWRF is still kind of blowing this up, but on the NHC track
No, the 06z HWRF just brought it in on the forecast track at 990mb. Shows little to no development for the next 24 hours and barely gets anything going. Pretty realistic solution compared to what we've seen the past 48 hours frm the HWRF.
GlennOBX wrote:Is there a website where we can see the latest "spaghetti chart" of the model runs? The one I used to go to for that doesn't show them anymore. Also, a previous poster said the models were trending west now. How far west are they trending?
GlennOBX wrote:Is there a website where we can see the latest "spaghetti chart" of the model runs? The one I used to go to for that doesn't show them anymore. Also, a previous poster said the models were trending west now. How far west are they trending?
txwatcher91 wrote:It's probably way off and can be thrown out but FWIW the 4km NAM has a 923mb hurricane heading for the big bend region of Florida.
stormlover2013 wrote:CMC and the JMA is interesting also
hohnywx wrote:stormlover2013 wrote:CMC and the JMA is interesting also
Can you elaborate?
txwatcher91 wrote:hohnywx wrote:stormlover2013 wrote:CMC and the JMA is interesting also
Can you elaborate?
CMC is further west and a bit stronger, I'm not sure about the JMA but would assume it's stronger as well.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests