Texas Spring 2016

U.S. & Caribbean Weather Discussions and Severe Weather Events

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
TexasF6
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 816
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Austin, TX

Re: Texas Spring 2016

#981 Postby TexasF6 » Tue Apr 26, 2016 6:42 am

Nam is a model, close to in time to an event usually does well, PDS is Potentially Dangerous Situation tornado conditions. It's predicted now.
0 likes   

Jarodm12
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 337
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 8:05 pm

Re: Texas Spring 2016

#982 Postby Jarodm12 » Tue Apr 26, 2016 6:54 am

Where is it predicted? can you link?

SPC only has a moderate risk just north of DFW
0 likes   

User avatar
gboudx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4080
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:39 pm
Location: Rockwall, Tx but from Harvey, La

Re: Texas Spring 2016

#983 Postby gboudx » Tue Apr 26, 2016 7:19 am

Here's Steve McCauleys update

The stage is set for a potentially damaging severe weather event today from central Texas north into southern Nebraska. Here is the latest estimate on what to expect here in north Texas. NOTE: This is a very complicated setup, so we must allow for modifications to these details. In other words, changes are likely to occur!

Isolated supercell storms with very large hail, damaging winds, torrential rainfall, and a tornado threat will fire west of the Metroplex by late afternoon. They will merge into a BROKEN line as they push into the Metroplex after 6 PM. Since the line will not likely be solid, there will be locations that will slip through the cracks and not see anything at all. But the storms that do manage to move in will be strong to severe with perhaps somewhat smaller hail but still carrying the damaging wind, torrential rainfall, and isolated tornado threat.

(As you all know, the main tornado threat will be to our north in Oklahoma and Kansas, but it certainly CANNOT be ruled out here in north Texas)

After this first round of storms goes through, a SOLID line of storms will then form to our west and sweep the Metroplex Tuesday night and exit the area after 1:00 or 2:00 AM. It is hoped the first round of storm will knock a lot of the energy out of the atmosphere so that the second line won't be as intense. BUT ... if the first BROKEN line of storms has too many holes in it, the second line could be quite intense as well.

Stay tuned for what will almost assuredly be changes to this outlook, but this is the best guess right now.
0 likes   

Jarodm12
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 337
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 8:05 pm

Re: Texas Spring 2016

#984 Postby Jarodm12 » Tue Apr 26, 2016 8:23 am

SPC extends the 10% tornado risk through north Texas.
0 likes   

User avatar
TheProfessor
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3506
Age: 28
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:56 am
Location: Wichita, Kansas

Re: Texas Spring 2016

#985 Postby TheProfessor » Tue Apr 26, 2016 8:59 am

Looks like there is a gravity wave on satellite in West Texas, this could complicate things but it looks like it's moving through fast so hopefully it doesn't cause trouble.
Edit: I don't know how this could interact with possible storms, I just know it was possibly a gravity wave that helped make the Jarrell Texas storm what it was. Hopefully it doesn't slow down.
0 likes   
An alumnus of The Ohio State University.

Your local National Weather Service office is your best source for weather information.

User avatar
Ntxw
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 22785
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: DFW, Texas

Re: Texas Spring 2016

#986 Postby Ntxw » Tue Apr 26, 2016 9:18 am

Hrrr (though hasn't been great of late, did get storms right yesterday just happened hundreds of miles further south) quickly has a solid MCS line crossing late this evening. Million dollar question is what singular cell ahead will form if any and dump mammoth hail and/or brief tornado? It will take some time as cap is present this morning.

6pmish

Image

9pmish

Image
0 likes   
The above post and any post by Ntxw is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including Storm2k. For official information, please refer to NWS products.

  Help support Storm2K!
Help Support Storm2K

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Texas Spring 2016

#987 Postby cheezyWXguy » Tue Apr 26, 2016 9:21 am

Ntxw wrote:Hrrr (though hasn't been great of late, did get storms right yesterday just happened hundreds of miles further south) quickly has a solid MCS line crossing late this evening. Million dollar question is what singular cell ahead will form if any and dump mammoth hail and/or brief tornado? It will take some time as cap is present this morning.


What is also interesting to note though, is that it basically forms this MCS all the way into Kansas. I was under the impression that most storms would remain discrete north of the Red River, or at least the Norman/OKC area since the tornado threat was determined to be so much higher up there. NAM 4km on the other hand, continues to paint more of a cluster-of-random-supercells look, and again has a PDS TOR hazard over the immediate DFW area at hour 15. Do you think the HRRR is forming this into an MCS to early, or that the NAM is holding off on it for too long?
0 likes   

User avatar
Ntxw
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 22785
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: DFW, Texas

Re: Texas Spring 2016

#988 Postby Ntxw » Tue Apr 26, 2016 9:27 am

cheezyWXguy wrote:What is also interesting to note though, is that it basically forms this MCS all the way into Kansas. I was under the impression that most storms would remain discrete north of the Red River, or at least the Norman/OKC area since the tornado threat was determined to be so much higher up there. NAM 4km on the other hand, continues to paint more of a cluster-of-random-supercells look, and again has a PDS TOR hazard over the immediate DFW area at hour 15. Do you think the HRRR is forming this into an MCS to early, or that the NAM is holding off on it for too long?


4k NAM can be overzealous sometimes. It may be due to resolution but I'm not certain. HRRR can be too happy with storm initiation thus quickly congealing it. Perhaps a blend of the two, an MCS will form as it approaches I-35 though, if they fire hard out west the more likely that is to happen. If they fire closer to us the more discrete they will be probably.

One caveat is the gravity waves mentioned this morning. Hard to know what they will do.
0 likes   
The above post and any post by Ntxw is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including Storm2k. For official information, please refer to NWS products.



  Help support Storm2K!

Help Support Storm2K


User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Texas Spring 2016

#989 Postby cheezyWXguy » Tue Apr 26, 2016 9:35 am

Ntxw wrote:
cheezyWXguy wrote:What is also interesting to note though, is that it basically forms this MCS all the way into Kansas. I was under the impression that most storms would remain discrete north of the Red River, or at least the Norman/OKC area since the tornado threat was determined to be so much higher up there. NAM 4km on the other hand, continues to paint more of a cluster-of-random-supercells look, and again has a PDS TOR hazard over the immediate DFW area at hour 15. Do you think the HRRR is forming this into an MCS to early, or that the NAM is holding off on it for too long?


4k NAM can be overzealous sometimes. It may be due to resolution but I'm not certain. HRRR can be too happy with storm initiation thus quickly congealing it. Perhaps a blend of the two, an MCS will form as it approaches I-35 though, if they fire hard out west the more likely that is to happen. If they fire closer to us the more discrete they will be probably.

One caveat is the gravity waves mentioned this morning. Hard to know what they will do.


Thanks for the reply. Speak of the devil, the 13z HRRR looks broken/discrete for a bit longer than the 12z did. And with the gravity wave, yeah, I guess only time will tell.
0 likes   

User avatar
TheProfessor
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3506
Age: 28
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:56 am
Location: Wichita, Kansas

Re: Texas Spring 2016

#990 Postby TheProfessor » Tue Apr 26, 2016 10:25 am

Here are the Gravity Waves at 14:45z A new small line of the wave actually developed west of this one.

Image
image hosting 30 mb
0 likes   
An alumnus of The Ohio State University.

Your local National Weather Service office is your best source for weather information.

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Texas Spring 2016

#991 Postby cheezyWXguy » Tue Apr 26, 2016 10:43 am

TheProfessor wrote:Here are the Gravity Waves at 14:45z A new small line of the wave actually developed west of this one.

[img]http://s32.postimg.org/k7upyvj45/Gravity_waves_1.jpg[
image hosting 30 mb


What implications do you think these waves might have on the storms this afternoon?
0 likes   

User avatar
TheProfessor
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3506
Age: 28
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:56 am
Location: Wichita, Kansas

Re: Texas Spring 2016

#992 Postby TheProfessor » Tue Apr 26, 2016 10:47 am

cheezyWXguy wrote:
TheProfessor wrote:Here are the Gravity Waves at 14:45z A new small line of the wave actually developed west of this one.

[img]http://s32.postimg.org/k7upyvj45/Gravity_waves_1.jpg[
image hosting 30 mb


What implications do you think these waves might have on the storms this afternoon?


I don't know a lot about gravity waves, they're causing elevated storms to form in Oklahoma. The elevated storms shouldn't repress the severe weather and in fact could form some outflow boundaries that could increase severe weather later on. From what I have gathered on the gravity waves is that they show the potency of the storm system and could be a sign that the CAP will break later today.
0 likes   
An alumnus of The Ohio State University.

Your local National Weather Service office is your best source for weather information.

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Texas Spring 2016

#993 Postby cheezyWXguy » Tue Apr 26, 2016 11:15 am

TheProfessor wrote:
cheezyWXguy wrote:
TheProfessor wrote:Here are the Gravity Waves at 14:45z A new small line of the wave actually developed west of this one.

[img]http://s32.postimg.org/k7upyvj45/Gravity_waves_1.jpg[
image hosting 30 mb


What implications do you think these waves might have on the storms this afternoon?


I don't know a lot about gravity waves, they're causing elevated storms to form in Oklahoma. The elevated storms shouldn't repress the severe weather and in fact could form some outflow boundaries that could increase severe weather later on. From what I have gathered on the gravity waves is that they show the potency of the storm system and could be a sign that the CAP will break later today.


Thanks for the info. They do look interesting on vis satellite.

I'm having trouble trusting the HRRR on MCS development tonight. It seems intent on developing a large number of storms and having them merge so quickly into a solid line, yet out ahead of the line, the fcst sounding for Dallas has shown PDS TOR for the last 2 runs in a row. With such favorable shear profiles over the metro even later this evening, it seems like storms would stay discrete for longer than the model is advertising. Someone please correct me if I'm interpreting this wrong.
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Texas Spring 2016

#994 Postby cheezyWXguy » Tue Apr 26, 2016 11:37 am

SPC just extended the MDT risk to include much of NTX
0 likes   

User avatar
gboudx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4080
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:39 pm
Location: Rockwall, Tx but from Harvey, La

Re: Texas Spring 2016

#995 Postby gboudx » Tue Apr 26, 2016 11:38 am

cheezyWXguy wrote:SPC just extended the MDT risk to include much of NTX


Yep
Image
0 likes   

User avatar
gboudx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4080
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:39 pm
Location: Rockwall, Tx but from Harvey, La

Re: Texas Spring 2016

#996 Postby gboudx » Tue Apr 26, 2016 11:43 am

Image

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Annie Oakley
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1103
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 12:54 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Texas Spring 2016

#997 Postby Annie Oakley » Tue Apr 26, 2016 11:52 am

Jarodm12 wrote:What does that mean.. NAM PDS TOR?


I didn't know what it means either. I hope a MET can chime in and give us a 'civilian' explanation. In the meantime I found this...............

http://www.spc.noaa.gov/publications/dean/pdswatch.pdf


I'm getting scared for tonight. What's a good thing to put on a car windshield to protect it while parked?
0 likes   

User avatar
TheProfessor
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3506
Age: 28
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:56 am
Location: Wichita, Kansas

Re: Texas Spring 2016

#998 Postby TheProfessor » Tue Apr 26, 2016 11:59 am

Annie Oakley wrote:
Jarodm12 wrote:What does that mean.. NAM PDS TOR?


I didn't know what it means either. I hope a MET can chime in and give us a 'civilian' explanation. In the meantime I found this...............

http://www.spc.noaa.gov/publications/dean/pdswatch.pdf


I'm getting scared for tonight. What's a good thing to put on a car windshield to protect it while parked?


A PDS TOR means there is a confirmed tornado and it typically gets a PDS warning if Damage has been seen in an Urban area. PDS stands for Particularly Dangerous Situation. The Saving Grace for the Metro tonight might be that the storms form out into a line. However if the Storms stay as individual cells or if individual cells form ahead of the line it could get really bad. The best Tornado parameters arrive after 7PM Central, hopefully the storms have already formed a line by then.
0 likes   
An alumnus of The Ohio State University.

Your local National Weather Service office is your best source for weather information.

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Texas Spring 2016

#999 Postby cheezyWXguy » Tue Apr 26, 2016 12:07 pm

Annie Oakley wrote:
Jarodm12 wrote:What does that mean.. NAM PDS TOR?


I didn't know what it means either. I hope a MET can chime in and give us a 'civilian' explanation. In the meantime I found this...............

http://www.spc.noaa.gov/publications/dean/pdswatch.pdf


I'm getting scared for tonight. What's a good thing to put on a car windshield to protect it while parked?


I'm not a met, but as I've come to interpret it, PDS TOR from model output basically means that in that location, it forecasts very favorable conditions for a tornado to occur. It is by no means official, and just like all other model data, has the potential to change from run to run. Because of this, it holds far less weight than an official PDS watch from the NWS would. The reason this keeps popping up in discussion at the moment is that the NAM 4km and HRRR have had a few runs showing conditions in NTX that prompt this label. IMO, its something that should prompt attention, but certainly not alarm. We just won't know how favorable conditions will be until they begin to unfold, but it doesn't hurt to be prepared.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ntxw
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 22785
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: DFW, Texas

Re: Texas Spring 2016

#1000 Postby Ntxw » Tue Apr 26, 2016 12:16 pm

The moderate risk expansion south is due to increased confidence in wind and very large hail by the SPC. Tor hatched area looks to remain the same. A culprit might be a bow echo type system tonight at least for wind.
0 likes   
The above post and any post by Ntxw is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including Storm2k. For official information, please refer to NWS products.



  Help support Storm2K!

Help Support Storm2K



Return to “USA & Caribbean Weather”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests