AutoPenalti wrote:Most notable is that it's slowing down.
And slowing down always indicates 2 things:
Better chance to intensify.
A possible track change.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
AutoPenalti wrote:Most notable is that it's slowing down.
wxman57 wrote:On their new advisory, the NHC admits a 35kt estimate is "probably generous". I agree. They also mention it could very well dissipate in the next day or so - that's quite possible. The center remains well-detached from any convection tonight. I do not see it re-forming farther south. My gut is saying its intensity when it nears south Florida may be closer to 25 kts than 65 kts. I'm not saying it can't be a hurricane, but I think it will be weaker. It could well dissipate tomorrow.
NCSTORMMAN wrote:Erika should be dead by tomorrow. Never go against the magical shear that is in place it rips storms up for breakfast. Good thing too this thing could of been a lot worse. Convection is not wrapping around anything, convection seems to be dying off, and the storm looks more like a bunch of thunderstorms over the midwest than a TC.
SeGaBob wrote::uarrow: And then tomorrow you'll be talking about how it's strengthening... just give it some time before you say it'll do this or that. Florida should monitor this regardless.
NCSTORMMAN wrote:Erika should be dead by tomorrow. Never go against the magical shear that is in place it rips storms up for breakfast. Good thing too this thing could of been a lot worse. Convection is not wrapping around anything, convection seems to be dying off, and the storm looks more like a bunch of thunderstorms over the midwest than a TC.
Bocadude85 wrote:What I do not understand is why Avila didn't reduce the intensity forecast if this may not survive? Why not show a ts at the 5 day point?
wxman57 wrote:On their new advisory, the NHC admits a 35kt estimate is "probably generous". I agree. They also mention it could very well dissipate in the next day or so - that's quite possible. The center remains well-detached from any convection tonight. I do not see it re-forming farther south. My gut is saying its intensity when it nears south Florida may be closer to 25 kts than 65 kts. I'm not saying it can't be a hurricane, but I think it will be weaker. It could well dissipate tomorrow.
TropicalAnalystwx13 wrote:NCSTORMMAN wrote:Erika should be dead by tomorrow. Never go against the magical shear that is in place it rips storms up for breakfast. Good thing too this thing could of been a lot worse. Convection is not wrapping around anything, convection seems to be dying off, and the storm looks more like a bunch of thunderstorms over the midwest than a TC.
Unless you have a time machine, making statements like these are very premature. I'm sure weather enthusiasts were saying the same thing in 1992 when Andrew was barely classifiable in the central Atlantic.*
* Since some like to take things out of context, no, I am not calling for an Andrew. But the overall idea that a storm's current presentation does not preclude significant strengthening later down the road remains.
Hammy wrote:Bocadude85 wrote:What I do not understand is why Avila didn't reduce the intensity forecast if this may not survive? Why not show a ts at the 5 day point?
I would assume for consistency, what if the next set of runs show a major again, and they have to flip back to hurricane.
TropicalAnalystwx13 wrote:NCSTORMMAN wrote:Erika should be dead by tomorrow. Never go against the magical shear that is in place it rips storms up for breakfast. Good thing too this thing could of been a lot worse. Convection is not wrapping around anything, convection seems to be dying off, and the storm looks more like a bunch of thunderstorms over the midwest than a TC.
Unless you have a time machine, making statements like these are very premature. I'm sure weather enthusiasts were saying the same thing in 1992 when Andrew was barely classifiable in the central Atlantic.*
* Since some like to take things out of context, no, I am not calling for an Andrew. But the overall idea that a storm's current presentation does not preclude significant strengthening later down the road remains.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests