2014 TCRs
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34002
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re:
galaxy401 wrote:I haven't seen them not include a hurricane's CPAC data before. They still have the CPAC in best track.
Correct, but that was based on the preliminary BT.
Genevieve IMO will probably be last since it has to incorporate JMA/JTWC data as well.
0 likes
Re: 2014 TCRs
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL092014_Hanna.pdf
Hanna out, track shifted northward for second phase, pretty much where everyone on the forum thought it was.
Hanna out, track shifted northward for second phase, pretty much where everyone on the forum thought it was.
0 likes
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- Cainer
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 188
- Age: 34
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 3:26 pm
- Location: Yarmouth, Nova Scotia
Bertha and Fay both out. Bertha stays the same, Fay bumped up to 70kt/983mb with a landfall intensity of 70kt/984mb. Also the first hurricane to make landfall on Bermuda since 1987... Followed by Gonzalo 5 days later. The report also mentions that it will be difficult to differentiate damage caused by Fay to that caused by Gonzalo as well.
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34002
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Going through the reports now. I'd have gone a little higher for Fay after seeing those reports, wondering perhaps if it was stronger over water. Also the high gusts are noteworthy as well, even if they are a bit elevated. I'd have gone with 75 kt for the intensity. None of that data was available in real time though, just the Bermuda Airport which had 51 kt (10-min) winds.
Fay reminded me of some other storms that were poorly prepared for and did more damage than expected, such as Katrina in Florida and Tomas in the Windward Islands.
Fay reminded me of some other storms that were poorly prepared for and did more damage than expected, such as Katrina in Florida and Tomas in the Windward Islands.
0 likes
Re: 2014 TCRs
Interesting, my theory on the intensity based on satellite/timing of wind measurements seems correct. 105 kts prior to the plane getting there.
0 likes
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34002
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/EP192014_Simon.pdf
Simon released. No major changes. Interesting about its peak intensity, it collapsed quickly because SST's dropped below 22C.
Simon released. No major changes. Interesting about its peak intensity, it collapsed quickly because SST's dropped below 22C.
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34002
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Gonzalo TCR released. One significant change was that it was a hurricane BEFORE Antigua as we thought, not after, as surface data supports 65-70 kt.
The Bermuda landfall intensity of 95 kt appears reasonable based on surface data. I'd have given some extra weight to the SFMR and the ADT at peak intensity, though, and gone with a 130 kt peak intensity.
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL082014_Gonzalo.pdf
The Bermuda landfall intensity of 95 kt appears reasonable based on surface data. I'd have given some extra weight to the SFMR and the ADT at peak intensity, though, and gone with a 130 kt peak intensity.
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL082014_Gonzalo.pdf
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34002
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Arthur now out and Bertha updated. Not a lot of changes.
The 85 kt landfall intensity seems reasonable for Arthur (higher SFMR readings operationally were biased too high, and the dropsondes don't seem representative). I believe the Canada data is 10-min sustained though, so I would have kept Arthur at hurricane intensity longer, right up to becoming XT (and at 1200Z and 1800Z as well on July 5).
The 85 kt landfall intensity seems reasonable for Arthur (higher SFMR readings operationally were biased too high, and the dropsondes don't seem representative). I believe the Canada data is 10-min sustained though, so I would have kept Arthur at hurricane intensity longer, right up to becoming XT (and at 1200Z and 1800Z as well on July 5).
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34002
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL012014_Arthur.pdf - Arthur
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/EP122014_Lowell.pdf - Also EPAC Lowell released.
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/EP122014_Lowell.pdf - Also EPAC Lowell released.
0 likes
A bit odd that Cristobal and Dolly aren't out yet given the relatively minimal impacts.
0 likes
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34002
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re:
Hammy wrote:A bit odd that Cristobal and Dolly aren't out yet given the relatively minimal impacts.
Not sure why? I know some in the EPAC like Genevieve are likely awaiting data from other agencies (Genevieve will be last I think, since it requires CPHC, JTWC and JMA collaboration).
1 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: facemane, Google Adsense [Bot], Hurricaneman, IsabelaWeather, KirbyDude25 and 43 guests