ATL: CRISTOBAL - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re:

#861 Postby ozonepete » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:28 am

Alyono wrote:shear and Hispañiola have really taken a toll on this. Very possible nothing forms until Sunday now


Or could dissipate very soon, right?
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: Re:

#862 Postby Alyono » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:30 am

ozonepete wrote:
Alyono wrote:shear and Hispañiola have really taken a toll on this. Very possible nothing forms until Sunday now


Or could dissipate very soon, right?


where do you get dissipation from? Nothing suggests that. Only delayed formation
0 likes   

USTropics
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2651
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
Location: Florida State University

#863 Postby USTropics » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:36 am

CIMSS showing lowering convergence right over the center for the first time tonight:

Image
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: Re:

#864 Postby ozonepete » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:50 am

Alyono wrote:
ozonepete wrote:
Alyono wrote:shear and Hispañiola have really taken a toll on this. Very possible nothing forms until Sunday now


Or could dissipate very soon, right?


where do you get dissipation from? Nothing suggests that. Only delayed formation


Oh, ok, I just thought from your posts that you felt this system keeps looking like it will develop but never delivers and won't deliver. I missed the part where you said it will develop by Sunday. My bad. :)
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#865 Postby ozonepete » Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:58 am

Here's the center. Too bad Aric isn't around to help verify this but he'll be around soon enough.


Image
0 likes   

hectopascal

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#866 Postby hectopascal » Sat Aug 23, 2014 4:23 am

ozonepete wrote:Here's the center. Too bad Aric isn't around to help verify this but he'll be around soon enough.


Image


Just looks a tot centre is S of your mark i would thnk and more leeward.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
0 likes   

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5467
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#867 Postby chaser1 » Sat Aug 23, 2014 4:27 am

I clearly see that LLC that's north of the coast, but I can't help but notice what appears to be an alternate point - perhaps the mid level COC (?) at 69.8 & 18.4. That point would place it right along the southern coastline. One would logically assume that the LLC - OVER WATER, might be better equipped to tap into that warm water and once and for all consolidate it's confused self??!! What a potential game changer though if a mid level vorticity parked over "the rock", we're to ultimately be the identity of this system.
0 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

hectopascal

#868 Postby hectopascal » Sat Aug 23, 2014 4:35 am

Image
Quite easy to see it. its not even close to that N area being pointed out.
0 likes   

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5467
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#869 Postby chaser1 » Sat Aug 23, 2014 4:40 am

:uarrow: "Which" it? LOL
0 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

#870 Postby Hammy » Sat Aug 23, 2014 4:51 am

Circulation is very evident on rapidscan in the vacinity of 20/70 or a little NW of there. All of the low clouds over the Dominican Republic are now out of the west. The question is whether it is at cloud level or the surface at this point.
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

hectopascal

#871 Postby hectopascal » Sat Aug 23, 2014 4:51 am

Leeward need me to hold your and walk you to it. :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5302
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

#872 Postby Nimbus » Sat Aug 23, 2014 5:09 am

The mid level circulation has historically appeared south of the LLC with this invest.
If 96L doesn't continue west of 70W it may drift inland over Hispaniola though.
The current trough off the mid atlantic coast is going negative tilt.
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

#873 Postby Alyono » Sat Aug 23, 2014 5:24 am

mentioned this in the models thread

The environment does not appear as if it will favor rapid intensification. With the building high to the NW of the system, this would restrict the outflow.

This pattern favors gradual intensification. While this will likely become a hurricane, it likely will be along the lines of an Erin from 1995 not major hurricane
0 likes   

HurriGuy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 734
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 8:43 pm
Location: Prairieville, LA

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#874 Postby HurriGuy » Sat Aug 23, 2014 5:51 am

0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145354
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#875 Postby cycloneye » Sat Aug 23, 2014 5:56 am

Plane flying this morning.Let's see if they find a closed LLC.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

xironman
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2522
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 4:53 pm
Location: NoVA

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#876 Postby xironman » Sat Aug 23, 2014 5:56 am

Alyono wrote:mentioned this in the models thread

The environment does not appear as if it will favor rapid intensification. With the building high to the NW of the system, this would restrict the outflow.

This pattern favors gradual intensification. While this will likely become a hurricane, it likely will be along the lines of an Erin from 1995 not major hurricane


I can see what you mean, but it does have a fairly decent UL anti-cyclone above it. Will be interesting to see once it departs from land.
0 likes   

hectopascal

#877 Postby hectopascal » Sat Aug 23, 2014 5:57 am

Image
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#878 Postby Alyono » Sat Aug 23, 2014 5:59 am

xironman wrote:
Alyono wrote:mentioned this in the models thread

The environment does not appear as if it will favor rapid intensification. With the building high to the NW of the system, this would restrict the outflow.

This pattern favors gradual intensification. While this will likely become a hurricane, it likely will be along the lines of an Erin from 1995 not major hurricane


I can see what you mean, but it does have a fairly decent UL anti-cyclone above it. Will be interesting to see once it departs from land.


Right now, its west of the upper high. Once in the Bahamas, shear drops off. However, the upper flow likely won't allow for the creation of multiple outflow channels. I suspect we will only have 1, which is more favorable for gradual intensification. Really need 2 or more for rapid intenification
0 likes   

User avatar
northjaxpro
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8900
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL

#879 Postby northjaxpro » Sat Aug 23, 2014 6:06 am

It is looking more that Sunday will be the day when 96L wil foinally be able to get its act together. Right now, 96L is interacting with Hispaniola and won't pull together until it can get farther away from that mountainous terrain. Also, I think the spin near 20N and 70W is where the potential LLC is at this time.

Once it gets in the Bahamas firmly late today and tonight, steady development will commence. Also, it seems to my eyes that 96L has slowed its forward motion some *s it is tangled interacting with Hispaniola.

Not an official forecast of course. Just the opinion of this poster.
0 likes   
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!

________________________________________________________________________________________

Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019

xironman
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2522
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 4:53 pm
Location: NoVA

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#880 Postby xironman » Sat Aug 23, 2014 6:08 am

Alyono wrote:
Right now, its west of the upper high. Once in the Bahamas, shear drops off. However, the upper flow likely won't allow for the creation of multiple outflow channels. I suspect we will only have 1, which is more favorable for gradual intensification. Really need 2 or more for rapid intenification


Yeah the visual could be a bit deceiving with that ULL to the east http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... display=24
0 likes   


Return to “2014”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests