For the USA Today one, the last 3 paragraphs were kind of silly or strange:
USA Today wrote:"We are only at the midpoint of the six-month hurricane season, and have just entered the peak of the hurricane season (mid-August through late October)," Feltgen warns. "It is a mistake to believe that the second half of the season would resemble the first half."
So after under-hyping the season in the title, this is added? The whole season is a dud yet we all need to be alert?
USA Today wrote:"Hurricane formation in the Atlantic is overdue and is soon likely to shift in favor of multiple tropical systems," says Kottlowski.

No science to be found here. So we're overdue huh? Soon likely to shift in favor of multiple tropical systems? Nope. That's what was said in mid-August. Horrible.
USA Today wrote:As of late Friday afternoon, the hurricane center was monitoring three separate tropical disturbances in the Atlantic. However, none is forecast to develop into a hurricane.
Well the one off Africa is borderline but hopefully it fails quick.
CYCLONE MIKE wrote:And still find it ridiculous how some keep going back all the way to 2001 to make a case to say the season could still catch fire and be extremely busy. First conditions were obvioulsy totally different then they are now and second there is just no way of knowing if things will eventually turn on. Or they could just as easily stay the same as they have all summer or worse. The fronts and troughs are only going to keep getting stronger and more frequent.
I read this somewhere else in here and I agree, this is true. When the forecast goes wrong, they jump to the next possible extreme outcome. They must believe in
equilibrium hardcore here

.