ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 2:13 pm
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
ozonepete wrote:
Watch the rgb satellite loop. Wxman57, Alyono and I have all stated in recent posts that we can see a new LLC developing around 22.0N, 90.5W. We already gave our reasons why and I backed up mine with annotated satellite images. It just so happens that the new LLC is forming under that MLC but we are not confusing the two by any means - we certainly know the difference. The rgb satellite will show you both MLC and LLC to a large degree as long as the MLC doesn't obscure the LLC below. You may very well be seeing something different, but we all have many years a lot of experience in watching these and that's what we see.
Hold on... I dont put it that far east. The LLC is still west of there.
What I said, watch the broad low. Pay no attention to any eddy that forms, whether the eddy forms to the east or the west
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4743
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
- Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
Alyono wrote:ozonepete wrote:
Watch the rgb satellite loop. Wxman57, Alyono and I have all stated in recent posts that we can see a new LLC developing around 22.0N, 90.5W. We already gave our reasons why and I backed up mine with annotated satellite images. It just so happens that the new LLC is forming under that MLC but we are not confusing the two by any means - we certainly know the difference. The rgb satellite will show you both MLC and LLC to a large degree as long as the MLC doesn't obscure the LLC below. You may very well be seeing something different, but we all have many years a lot of experience in watching these and that's what we see.
Hold on... I dont put it that far east. The LLC is still west of there.
What I said, watch the broad low. Pay no attention to any eddy that forms, whether the eddy forms to the east or the west
I understand, but I thought you agreed that any LLC that does form will be well north of the best track position. Do you think it's south of 22.0N? i.e. where do you think the most likely area for an LLC to develop is? I thought you agreed that the LLC that best track has been following is basically dissipated and that any new one would form farther north... I always talk about the most likely place for an LLC to form and the best physical evidence that it's happening. We al know you don't follow a single eddy and ignore the others. But in the end, one will get under the MLC and they'll consolidate if conditions allow. Right?
Last edited by ozonepete on Fri Aug 16, 2013 8:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- stormhunter7
- Category 2
- Posts: 762
- Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 3:13 pm
- Location: Panama City Beach, Florida
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
so the "center"... of the surface low at 20.8n 91.8w.. moving to the sw, is going to fade away? And a newer center is forming well to the NE up under the ULL?
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... -long.html
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... -long.html
0 likes
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products. http://www.nhc.noaa.gov
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4743
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
- Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
stormhunter7 wrote:so the "center"... of the surface low at 20.8n 91.8w.. moving to the sw, is going to fade away? And a newer center is forming well to the NE up under the ULL?
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... -long.html
That sfc low you referred to is pretty much gone already. In a tropical disturbance that has an MLC (which is all this is right now) many LLCs develop and rotate around each other and form and dissipate until one merges with the MLC dominates. In this case a new LLC will have to form to the north under the MLC or near it. Where the old LLC was there is no mid-level vorticity and it seems very unlikely the current MLC would dissipate and reform over that area. The physics for that latter case don't make sense.
Last edited by ozonepete on Fri Aug 16, 2013 8:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6358
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
- Location: Miramar Bch. FL
Re:
Alyono wrote:the broad low is still centered near 21.5N and 91.5W. It hasn't moved all day
Actually it's dropped southward, now near 20.9N 91.5W and still moving southward.
0 likes
Re: Re:
Dean4Storms wrote:Alyono wrote:the broad low is still centered near 21.5N and 91.5W. It hasn't moved all day
Actually it's dropped southward, now near 20.9N 91.5W and still moving southward.
Yeah, it has continued moving southward as I type this.
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4743
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
- Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY
Re: Re:
Dean4Storms wrote:Alyono wrote:the broad low is still centered near 21.5N and 91.5W. It hasn't moved all day
Actually it's dropped southward, now near 20.9N 91.5W and still moving southward.
Yes it has. And that purely surface circulation will continue dropping south and then dissipate. It hasn't been involved in the regeneration that's going on to the north at all. Any new LLC that develops will be centered NE of there.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 962
- Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:23 pm
- Location: Houston, Texas
I agree that the low level center will continue to drop south and weaken. However, as of 00z (sunset), the only sfc center supported by satellite and surface obs was this center. There was no evidence of any westerly surface flow to the north of the low level center. Its certainly possible that a sfc center could form farther north, but unless there's a ship in the area overnight, there won't be any way to know until after sunrise. In addition, without significant convection firing overnight underneath the mid/upper low, I doubt the circulation will build down to the surface.
I suspect the global models are correct in keeping this system broad and sloppy for the next several days. Synoptically, it just doesn't look good for TC formation.
I suspect the global models are correct in keeping this system broad and sloppy for the next several days. Synoptically, it just doesn't look good for TC formation.
0 likes
- stormhunter7
- Category 2
- Posts: 762
- Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 3:13 pm
- Location: Panama City Beach, Florida
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
0 likes
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products. http://www.nhc.noaa.gov
-
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 2:13 pm
Meh, I dunno. This thing just looks kind of sick. We're looking at a MLC that is lacking any deep convection and I don't see how it's going to form a prominent LLC with that being the case. Looks like it's dealing with some dry air ATM as well. Maybe this thing just kind of tumbles itself northward as a plume of moisture.
This is my very amateur take.
This is my very amateur take.
0 likes
- 'CaneFreak
- Category 5
- Posts: 1486
- Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
- Location: New Bern, NC
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4743
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
- Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY
Re:
wxsouth wrote:I agree that the low level center will continue to drop south and weaken. However, as of 00z (sunset), the only sfc center supported by satellite and surface obs was this center. There was no evidence of any westerly surface flow to the north of the low level center. Its certainly possible that a sfc center could form farther north, but unless there's a ship in the area overnight, there won't be any way to know until after sunrise. In addition, without significant convection firing overnight underneath the mid/upper low, I doubt the circulation will build down to the surface.
I suspect the global models are correct in keeping this system broad and sloppy for the next several days. Synoptically, it just doesn't look good for TC formation.
A good analysis.

0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
Another thing to keep an eye on if a vertically stacked cyclone can develop would be the potential for enhancement from the upper level trough to the north. It’s in a favorable orientation for baroclinic enhancement of any surface low. This is another reason we see the models developing large MCS’s and weak surface lows to the north/northeast of the primary surface circulation. There is favorable jet dynamics for increased upper level divergence over the Western Gulf. Thinking of it very simply removal of mass in the upper levels must be replaced, thus inducing surface pressure falls and convergence. If you removed a cup full of water from a bathtub it will almost immediately be replaced by surrounding water.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6358
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
- Location: Miramar Bch. FL
I can see an LLC near 22.5N 90.5W in this loop drifting North, if you can't see then you just don't want to see it. It's faded just like the LLC out to the SW!
Speed it up if you need to and zoom!
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... -long.html

Speed it up if you need to and zoom!
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... -long.html
0 likes
- Annie Oakley
- Category 5
- Posts: 1103
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 12:54 pm
- Location: Texas
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 11430
- Age: 35
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
- Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
- Contact:
Re:
Annie Oakley wrote:JonathanBelles: what say you?
I say that I just got home from a Rays game, and i'm lucky I saw this. lol
On first inspection I would say it looks better than it did earlier today. If it gets convection going later tonight during Dmax, we may be looking at a different story tomorrow. It may get better aligned overnight, and should have time to develop a bit.
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4743
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
- Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY
Re: Re:
JonathanBelles wrote:Annie Oakley wrote:JonathanBelles: what say you?
I say that I just got home from a Rays game, and i'm lucky I saw this. lol
On first inspection I would say it looks better than it did earlier today. If it gets convection going later tonight during Dmax, we may be looking at a different story tomorrow. It may get better aligned overnight, and should have time to develop a bit.
Yeah, let's see what DMAX does. I think it inhaled a lot of drier air from over the Yucatan in the last few hours. It didn't occur to me earlier how strong the influence could be, but when the diurnal sea breeze thunderstorm blowup over the Yucatan dies out at sunset it also causes a lot of descending drying air from the dying thunderstorms to get pushed down to the surface. This drier air probably got ingested into the circulation of our disturbance and further decreased its ability to produce thunderstorms offshore around its center. All of that should change overnight.

Last edited by ozonepete on Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests