ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re: Re:

#761 Postby Dean4Storms » Fri Aug 16, 2013 6:48 pm

ozonepete wrote:
Dean4Storms wrote:I might be looking at sat. loops too much today, but is anyone else seeing what looks like an Anti-cyclone getting established aloft over this once ULL?


Well not quite yet, but I do see good upper outflow on the northern, eastern and southeastern sides. That could help it to eventually get a full upper anti-cyclone to develop over it.


That's what I'm seeing, Thanks for the input!
0 likes   

nautical wheeler
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 2:13 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#762 Postby nautical wheeler » Fri Aug 16, 2013 7:03 pm

How many times have we seen a naked swirl form a convective MLC to its NE quadrant the last few years? It seems like one of two things happens: Either the LLC gets "pulled up" under the convective MLC or the system never quite gets its act together. If the MLC doesn't have enough convective energy it can never overcome the displaced "naked" LLC to form its own or merge back together.



I'm so intrigued by the way the ULL and this system have interacted. I, as a novice, have never seen a ULL, which was completely dissociated with the system, basically merge with and become the dominant factor in the system. I'm not even sure if that's a technically accurate description of what happened but I find it interesting nonetheless. :lol:
0 likes   

HurriGuy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 734
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 8:43 pm
Location: Prairieville, LA

#763 Postby HurriGuy » Fri Aug 16, 2013 7:05 pm

All this massive convection over the Yucatan....does it look to drop south like the convection yesterday or is this convection actually pulling north to the circulation?
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#764 Postby Dean4Storms » Fri Aug 16, 2013 7:10 pm

That ULL is beginning to drift northward, interesting day tomorrow.
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re:

#765 Postby ozonepete » Fri Aug 16, 2013 7:18 pm

HurriGuy wrote:All this massive convection over the Yucatan....does it look to drop south like the convection yesterday or is this convection actually pulling north to the circulation?


That is a massive blowup of afternoon thunderstorms over the Yucatan caused by sea breezes coming together from the west north and east. It happens almost daily there in the summer. It is also being exacerbated by the flow from this disturbance. So it's different in origin from what we saw last night. This convection is basically afternoon sea breeze storm convection so it will die out after sundown, and should not have much of an effect either way on the disturbance except to maybe rob a little energy from it over the next couple of hours or so. Then we will see if more true tropical thunderstorms build and concentrate around the new center north of the Yucatan during DMAX.
0 likes   

HurriGuy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 734
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 8:43 pm
Location: Prairieville, LA

Re: Re:

#766 Postby HurriGuy » Fri Aug 16, 2013 7:21 pm

ozonepete wrote:
HurriGuy wrote:All this massive convection over the Yucatan....does it look to drop south like the convection yesterday or is this convection actually pulling north to the circulation?


That is a massive blowup of afternoon thunderstorms over the Yucatan caused by sea breezes coming together from the west north and east. It happens almost daily there in the summer. It is also being exacerbated by the flow from this disturbance. So it's different in origin from what we saw last night. This convection is basically afternoon sea breeze storm convection so it will die out after sundown, and should not have much of an effect either way on the disturbance except to maybe rob a little energy from it over the next couple of hours or so. Then we will see if more true tropical thunderstorms build and concentrate around the new center north of the Yucatan during DMAX.


Thanks for explaining!
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

HurriGuy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 734
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 8:43 pm
Location: Prairieville, LA

#767 Postby HurriGuy » Fri Aug 16, 2013 7:26 pm

What is the latest 5 day rainfall totals for GFS? Curious to see if it pushed more into LA. I know our rain chances have been going up.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Janie2006
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1329
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 3:28 pm
Location: coastal Ms aka home of the hurricanes

#768 Postby Janie2006 » Fri Aug 16, 2013 7:27 pm

Squally wx moving in off the Gulf this evening. This particular squall has dropped a couple of inches of rain in the last hour or so. It may be a long weekend.
0 likes   

User avatar
Annie Oakley
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1103
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 12:54 pm
Location: Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#769 Postby Annie Oakley » Fri Aug 16, 2013 7:30 pm

Percentage lowered for the next 48 hours............that means what it says.

Am appreciating the pro-mets on here tonight!
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145286
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#770 Postby cycloneye » Fri Aug 16, 2013 7:39 pm

00z Best Track.

AL, 92, 2013081700, , BEST, 0, 210N, 917W, 25, 1009, LO
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#771 Postby Dean4Storms » Fri Aug 16, 2013 7:46 pm

Bath water to the north of this developing circulation lifting northward, buoy showing from over 85F to 87F SST's at times.

http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=42001
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#772 Postby ozonepete » Fri Aug 16, 2013 7:49 pm

cycloneye wrote:00z Best Track.

AL, 92, 2013081700, , BEST, 0, 210N, 917W, 25, 1009, LO


Wow, that is way off. :roll:
0 likes   

User avatar
Nikki
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 291
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:38 pm
Location: Santa Fe, TX (yes I typed that right TEXAS not New Mexico, I am about 20 miles from Galveston, TX)

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#773 Postby Nikki » Fri Aug 16, 2013 7:50 pm

ozonepete wrote:
cycloneye wrote:00z Best Track.

AL, 92, 2013081700, , BEST, 0, 210N, 917W, 25, 1009, LO


Wow, that is way off. :roll:



Where do you put it ozonepete? :)
0 likes   
My name is Nicole and this is what I go by in Storm2k chat! Come chat with us! We have fun in there too!!

A teacher's purpose is not to create students in her own image, but to develop students who can create their own image. ~Author Unknown

Alicia, Allison, Rita, Ike

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#774 Postby ROCK » Fri Aug 16, 2013 7:54 pm

yep Kat a lot more work for this to do. I have seen ULLs screw up a system internally and that is what is happening here. It has basically taken over the circulation and moisture associated with 92L even though technically its still 92L....almost doesnt look tropical but technically it is...

guidance at 18Z

http://www.ral.ucar.edu/hurricanes/real ... _early.png
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re:

#775 Postby ROCK » Fri Aug 16, 2013 7:54 pm

Dean4Storms wrote:Bath water to the north of this developing circulation lifting northward, buoy showing from over 85F to 87F SST's at times.

http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=42001



if it had a LLC it might make a difference.... :lol:
0 likes   

wxsouth
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 69
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 6:57 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#776 Postby wxsouth » Fri Aug 16, 2013 7:57 pm

ozonepete wrote:
cycloneye wrote:00z Best Track.

AL, 92, 2013081700, , BEST, 0, 210N, 917W, 25, 1009, LO


Wow, that is way off. :roll:


How is that 'way off'? It's right where the low-level center is. I've seen no evidence of any surface circulation farther north. That swirl in the satellite is mid/upper level. None of the surface data I've seen suggests a new center is forming.
0 likes   

User avatar
Annie Oakley
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1103
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 12:54 pm
Location: Texas

#777 Postby Annie Oakley » Fri Aug 16, 2013 8:13 pm

ha ha....Brooklyn vs. wxsouth.............

(all in good fun folks)
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#778 Postby ozonepete » Fri Aug 16, 2013 8:17 pm

wxsouth wrote:
ozonepete wrote:
cycloneye wrote:00z Best Track.

AL, 92, 2013081700, , BEST, 0, 210N, 917W, 25, 1009, LO


Wow, that is way off. :roll:


How is that 'way off'? It's right where the low-level center is. I've seen no evidence of any surface circulation farther north. That swirl in the satellite is mid/upper level. None of the surface data I've seen suggests a new center is forming.


Watch the rgb satellite loop. Wxman57, Alyono and I have all stated in recent posts that we can see a new LLC developing around 22.0N, 90.5W. We already gave our reasons why and I backed up mine with annotated satellite images. It just so happens that the new LLC is forming under that MLC but we are not confusing the two by any means - we certainly know the difference. The rgb satellite will show you both MLC and LLC to a large degree as long as the MLC doesn't obscure the LLC below. You may very well be seeing something different, but we all have many years a lot of experience in watching these and that's what we see. :)
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#779 Postby ozonepete » Fri Aug 16, 2013 8:18 pm

Nikki wrote:Where do you put it ozonepete? :)


:uarrow: Look right above. :)
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#780 Postby Dean4Storms » Fri Aug 16, 2013 8:24 pm

Yep, the RGB shows it pretty distinctly.
0 likes   


Return to “2013”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests