ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6358
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
- Location: Miramar Bch. FL
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
Stormcenter wrote:Ok sounds like JB obviously is not seeing the TX scenario here. He is calling for a N.Central GOM event. I personally will believe it when I see
it in reference to any of the predictions being made concerning 92L. It's not an easy call. IMOPearl River wrote:Joe B's tweet from about 20 minutes ago.Joe Bastardi @BigJoeBastardi
Gulf system modeled after July 4th ALAFla event.further west. Likely to strong winds, heavy rains on weekend for n cent gulf named or not
Check the 12Z NCEP Ensembles.....Most are North Central Gulf. Not out of the question at all.
0 likes
Re: Re:
wxman57 wrote:Dean4Storms wrote:12z GFS still with at least an 850mb Vort headed for AL/MS border.
http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis ... atl_13.png
Yeah, 12Z GFS has not a drop of rain for TX from it. Still tremendous uncertainty in its future track. I am fairly sure it will move ashore somewhere between Veracruz and Key West.
I got $20 you are right WX57

0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6358
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
- Location: Miramar Bch. FL
Re:
Alyono wrote:the vort max to the northern Gulf is not exactly the invest. It is more associated with the front.
I don't believe so, check the 12z NCEP Ensembles, most of them come straight up toward the upper Gulf Coast from being initialized at our Low off the NW Yucatan and that Vort from the GFS I see coming from the central Gulf with Weatherbell's graphics.
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
Once it realizes it's over water it should put some convection clothes back on.
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
This probably throws Louisiana in the mix for rainfall total too?
Most likely. If you run the GFS (and NCEP doesn't have the full 12z yet, only the 6z), you can see various pulses of moisture forming waves along the trough and pulsing up every day or so increasingly further west. Fox 8 last night showed a surface low along the front/trough gradually backing westward across the coast (which is atypical unless the trough backs up and the easterlies push in via a building ridge SW Atlantic. The first pulse (which shows up nicely if you run the 850 Vorticity (850 Vort_Ht) is farther east, and then the next few are southeast, south central LA and then Upper Texas Coast. These are probably ejected pieces of energy getting drawn up toward the trough. QPF has the 7 day bullseye just south of Pensacola Bay extending over to Plaquemines Parish Louisiana. You can see the 12z totals here:
http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/qpf/p168i.gif
Most likely. If you run the GFS (and NCEP doesn't have the full 12z yet, only the 6z), you can see various pulses of moisture forming waves along the trough and pulsing up every day or so increasingly further west. Fox 8 last night showed a surface low along the front/trough gradually backing westward across the coast (which is atypical unless the trough backs up and the easterlies push in via a building ridge SW Atlantic. The first pulse (which shows up nicely if you run the 850 Vorticity (850 Vort_Ht) is farther east, and then the next few are southeast, south central LA and then Upper Texas Coast. These are probably ejected pieces of energy getting drawn up toward the trough. QPF has the 7 day bullseye just south of Pensacola Bay extending over to Plaquemines Parish Louisiana. You can see the 12z totals here:
http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/qpf/p168i.gif
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
Looking at IF makes one wonder in 4-6 hrs if the NNE convection does make it's way to S
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/gmex/flash-ir4.html
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/gmex/flash-ir4.html
Last edited by Portastorm on Fri Aug 16, 2013 11:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Fix link
Reason: Fix link
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6358
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
- Location: Miramar Bch. FL
Last edited by Portastorm on Fri Aug 16, 2013 11:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Fix link
Reason: Fix link
0 likes
- Portastorm
- Storm2k Moderator
- Posts: 9914
- Age: 63
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
- Location: Round Rock, TX
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

Hey gang, when you're linking to another site please use the proper URL codes so that when we click on that link another window opens.
Thanks.
0 likes
Any forecasts under my name are to be taken with a grain of salt. Get your best forecasts from the National Weather Service and National Hurricane Center.
- 'CaneFreak
- Category 5
- Posts: 1486
- Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
- Location: New Bern, NC
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 22978
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
Re:
Dean4Storms wrote:Well maybe half the Ensembles....
http://derecho.math.uwm.edu/models/al922013_ens.png
That's still 6Z ensembles. 12z won't be out for a few hours.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 962
- Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:23 pm
- Location: Houston, Texas
Infared is showing convection starting to build on north side. Here we go.
0 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
0 likes
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 22978
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
Re:
Bailey1777 wrote:wxman57 you buying into those models...i dont....92l would be being drawn at least slightly northward by now if it was going for the northern solution...right?
One of the models may be correct. Not sure which one yet.
0 likes
- Portastorm
- Storm2k Moderator
- Posts: 9914
- Age: 63
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
- Location: Round Rock, TX
- Contact:
Re: Re:
wxman57 wrote:Bailey1777 wrote:wxman57 you buying into those models...i dont....92l would be being drawn at least slightly northward by now if it was going for the northern solution...right?
One of the models may be correct. Not sure which one yet.

Key West to Tampico is the zone, right?!
0 likes
Any forecasts under my name are to be taken with a grain of salt. Get your best forecasts from the National Weather Service and National Hurricane Center.
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 962
- Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:23 pm
- Location: Houston, Texas
- brunota2003
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 9476
- Age: 34
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
- Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
- Contact:
- Tireman4
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 5853
- Age: 59
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 1:08 pm
- Location: Humble, Texas
- Contact:
Re: Re:
wxman57 wrote:Bailey1777 wrote:wxman57 you buying into those models...i dont....92l would be being drawn at least slightly northward by now if it was going for the northern solution...right?
One of the models may be correct. Not sure which one yet.
Oh my goodness. LOL. Really? Just joshing....
0 likes
- Hurricanehink
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 2040
- Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2003 2:05 pm
- Location: New Jersey
Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion
The swirl west of the Yucatan reminds me of Andrea. It was just a swirl, and then after a burst of convection it really ramped up. The 2 pm TWO will be interesting.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests