ATL: DORIAN - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145304
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Dorian Remnants - Discussion

#3261 Postby cycloneye » Thu Aug 01, 2013 2:55 pm

fci wrote:


Flight plan anticipates a northward movement?

I. ATLANTIC REQUIREMENTS
1. REMNANTS OF DORIAN
FLIGHT ONE -- TEAL 71 FLIGHT TWO -- TEAL 72
A. 02/1800Z A. 03/0600Z
B. AFXXX 0304A INVEST B. AFXXX 0404A DORAIN
C. 02/1530Z C. 03/0400Z
D. 27.0N 79.5W D. 28.5N 79.5W
E. 02/1730Z TO 02/2130Z E. 02/0530Z TO 03/0930Z
F. SFC TO 10,000 FT F. SFC TO 10,000 FT

2. OUTLOOK FOR SUCCEEDING DAY.....NEGATIVE.



Yes,they dont see it going to GOM at this time.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

#3262 Postby fci » Thu Aug 01, 2013 2:57 pm

Looks like the area is smacking The Western Bahamas now:
SEVERE WEATHER WARNING

THE BAHAMAS DEPARTMENT OF METEOROLOGY HAS ISSUED A SEVERE THUNDERSTORM WARNING FROM 2:20 PM EDT UNTIL 4:20 PM EDT, THURSDAY 1ST AUGUST 2013.

A SEVERE THUNDERSTORM WARNING IS IN EFFECT FOR ANDROS, NEW PROVIDENCE, CAT ISLAND, NORTH ABACO AND GRAND BAHAMA AND EXUMA ALONG WITH THEIR ADJACENT WATERS AND CAYS.

AT 2:20 PM SATELLITE AND DOPPLER RADAR IMAGERY CONTINUED TO DEPICT LARGE CLUSTERS OF SHOWERS AND THUNDERSTORMS SPREADING ACROSS THE ABOVE MENTIONED AREAS.

SOME OF THESE THUNDERSTORMS WILL BE STRONG TO SEVERE AT TIMES, CAUSING STRONG GUSTY WINDS, DANGEROUS LIGHTNING, HEAVY DOWNPOURS WITH FLOODING IN LOW LYING OR FLOOD PRONE AREAS, POSSIBLE HAIL, AND WATERSPOUT OR TORNADIC ACTIVITY.

BOATERS IN THE WARNING AREAS SHOULD REMAIN IN PORT OR SEEK SAFE HARBOUR IMMEDIATELY. RESIDENTS IN THE WARNING AREAS SHOULD STAY INDOORS AND AWAY FROM WINDOWS AS CONDITIONS WORSEN.
0 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11496
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Dorian Remnants - Discussion

#3263 Postby GCANE » Thu Aug 01, 2013 2:57 pm

Sat analysis is tagging the LLC farther north and west where I thought. I was putting it just south of Andros.

http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/product ... 011915.jpg
0 likes   

User avatar
northjaxpro
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8900
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Dorian Remnants - Discussion

#3264 Postby northjaxpro » Thu Aug 01, 2013 2:59 pm

cycloneye wrote:
fci wrote:


Flight plan anticipates a northward movement?

I. ATLANTIC REQUIREMENTS
1. REMNANTS OF DORIAN
FLIGHT ONE -- TEAL 71 FLIGHT TWO -- TEAL 72
A. 02/1800Z A. 03/0600Z
B. AFXXX 0304A INVEST B. AFXXX 0404A DORAIN
C. 02/1530Z C. 03/0400Z
D. 27.0N 79.5W D. 28.5N 79.5W
E. 02/1730Z TO 02/2130Z E. 02/0530Z TO 03/0930Z
F. SFC TO 10,000 FT F. SFC TO 10,000 FT

2. OUTLOOK FOR SUCCEEDING DAY.....NEGATIVE.



Yes,they dont see it going to GOM at this time.


Good. I hope it plays out with the northward movement as we don't need this compounding to our already saturated conditions here. The trough should hopefully grab it in the short term.
Last edited by northjaxpro on Thu Aug 01, 2013 3:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!

________________________________________________________________________________________

Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re:

#3265 Postby wxman57 » Thu Aug 01, 2013 2:59 pm

Tireman4 wrote:Paging Wxman 57,


You maybe needed back in the morgue. Something is happening. Thank you.


I still say this is most definitely NOT Dorian. Vorticity associated with Dorian dissipated days ago. This is a new feature related to the upper low.
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#3266 Postby brunota2003 » Thu Aug 01, 2013 3:00 pm

This doesn't make sense. If it reforms, they'll rename it Dorian? Since when did that rule change? Last I read, in order for a storm to keep the same name, it has to maintain a closed low level circulation the entire time. The remnants have not had a closed LLC in several days...even though if a system forms, it may be from the remnants of Dorian, the name should change.
0 likes   
Just a small town southern boy helping other humans.

HurricaneDREW92
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 320
Age: 26
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 11:56 am
Location: Boston, MA

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Dorian Remnants - Discussion

#3267 Postby HurricaneDREW92 » Thu Aug 01, 2013 3:00 pm

Cycloneye adds S2k Disclaimer.

This post is NOT AN OFFICIAL FORECAST and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Obviously, I'm not a pro met, and my predictions should be taken with a grain of salt
HRS
12: 30kts
24: 45kts
48: 60kts
72: 65kts
96: 65kts
120:75kts

Image

Looks pretty scary though:
Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Ha, thanks cycloneye :lol:
Last edited by HurricaneDREW92 on Thu Aug 01, 2013 3:06 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   
This post is NOT AN OFFICIAL FORECAST and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

-THE ABOVE IS THE OPINION OF DREW ONLY

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re:

#3268 Postby wxman57 » Thu Aug 01, 2013 3:05 pm

brunota2003 wrote:This doesn't make sense. If it reforms, they'll rename it Dorian? Since when did that rule change? Last I read, in order for a storm to keep the same name, it has to maintain a closed low level circulation the entire time. The remnants have not had a closed LLC in several days...even though if a system forms, it may be from the remnants of Dorian, the name should change.


Right, this would not be named Dorian if it developed. All traces of Dorian are gone, with the possible exception that some of the moisture in the region was transported there by Dorian. No surface low or wave survived. It would be named "Erin". But development appears unlikely.
0 likes   

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

#3269 Postby fci » Thu Aug 01, 2013 3:07 pm

Cool that you have put together the forecast and map!!
What lead you to forecast the westerly track across SFL into the GOM.
NWS shows it headed north and taken by a trough off to the NE.
Your reasoning, (and this is not the least bit critical as you have put up a good presentation); I would just like the thought process for your conclusion
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts are just my opinion and are most likely not backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Bottom line is that I am just expressing my opinion!!!

Senobia
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 278
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow

#3270 Postby Senobia » Thu Aug 01, 2013 3:07 pm

Are we really back on Dorian again? :?:
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane Alexis
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 683
Age: 29
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 7:59 pm
Location: Miami,Florida

#3271 Postby Hurricane Alexis » Thu Aug 01, 2013 3:07 pm

From the Miami AFD.

MODELS APPEAR TO HAVE A DECENT HANDLE ON THE LOW PRESSURE AREA AND
ARE REASONABLY CONSISTENT IN KEEPING THE BULK OF THE ASSOCIATED
WEATHER OFFSHORE TONIGHT AND FRIDAY. THE GFS IS THE ONLY MODEL
WHICH BRINGS THE LOW LEVEL CIRCULATION (850 MB) ONSHORE THE EAST
COAST LATE TONIGHT AND EARLY FRIDAY, WITH THE NAM AND ECMWF
KEEPING IT OFFSHORE OVER THE STRAITS.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Ellsey
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 104
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 11:04 am
Location: McKinney, TX

Re: Re:

#3272 Postby Ellsey » Thu Aug 01, 2013 3:08 pm

lester wrote:
Ellsey wrote:This is like one of those action movies where you're so sure the hero died, but he magically reappears full of wounds and vigor. Dorian refuses to die completely! He must single-handedly save the Atlantic tropical season!


The Atlantic Hurricane Season is fine, the peak isn't for another couple of weeks.


It was a joke. Although honestly I wouldn't care if nothing else every happened if it means no one gets any storms.

To keep this on topic, I am very surprised this popped up again.
0 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11496
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Dorian Remnants - Discussion

#3273 Postby GCANE » Thu Aug 01, 2013 3:08 pm

HurricaneDREW92 wrote:Cycloneye adds S2k Disclaimer.

This post is NOT AN OFFICIAL FORECAST and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Obviously, I'm not a pro met, and my predictions should be taken with a grain of salt
HRS
12: 30kts
24: 45kts
48: 60kts
72: 65kts
96: 65kts
120:75kts

[url=http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/821/3c0.png/http://img821.imageshack.us/img821/2899/3c0.png[/url]

Looks pretty scary though:
http://img845.imageshack.us/img845/6180/w7j.gif

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Ha, thanks cycloneye :lol:



Track - about what I am thinking. Wind speeds - maybe higher.
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

Re: Re:

#3274 Postby brunota2003 » Thu Aug 01, 2013 3:10 pm

wxman57 wrote:
brunota2003 wrote:This doesn't make sense. If it reforms, they'll rename it Dorian? Since when did that rule change? Last I read, in order for a storm to keep the same name, it has to maintain a closed low level circulation the entire time. The remnants have not had a closed LLC in several days...even though if a system forms, it may be from the remnants of Dorian, the name should change.


Right, this would not be named Dorian if it developed. All traces of Dorian are gone, with the possible exception that some of the moisture in the region was transported there by Dorian. No surface low or wave survived. It would be named "Erin". But development appears unlikely.

But the NHC posted on their FB page that if it does reform, it will be named Dorian...not Erin. Which is where my confusion lies. Kyle in 2002 and Ivan in 2004 maintained their LLC, thus their name. But this system did not (and recon has confirmed that), yet it keeps the same name?
0 likes   
Just a small town southern boy helping other humans.

hurricanekid416
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 179
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 2:43 pm

#3275 Postby hurricanekid416 » Thu Aug 01, 2013 3:10 pm

I have a vacation to key west on August 15th I'm hoping this doesn't affect the island much
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

Re: Re:

#3276 Postby fci » Thu Aug 01, 2013 3:11 pm

wxman57 wrote:
brunota2003 wrote:This doesn't make sense. If it reforms, they'll rename it Dorian? Since when did that rule change? Last I read, in order for a storm to keep the same name, it has to maintain a closed low level circulation the entire time. The remnants have not had a closed LLC in several days...even though if a system forms, it may be from the remnants of Dorian, the name should change.


Right, this would not be named Dorian if it developed. All traces of Dorian are gone, with the possible exception that some of the moisture in the region was transported there by Dorian. No surface low or wave survived. It would be named "Erin". But development appears unlikely.


Wxman, I have the most faith and regard for you more than most others; but on Facebook; the NOAA-NWS responded to a question about a possible name and said "Dorian" (I posted it a page or so back in the thread).
It's not a particularly vital issue, discussing nomenclature; but makes for an interesting discussion nonetheless.
They didn't renumber the invest to 92 so they are associating it with 91 which clearly were the remnants of Dorian.
I'd tend to agree with you but not sure that NOAA-NWS does, or at least not the person who responded from them.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts are just my opinion and are most likely not backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Bottom line is that I am just expressing my opinion!!!

HurricaneDREW92
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 320
Age: 26
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 11:56 am
Location: Boston, MA

Re:

#3277 Postby HurricaneDREW92 » Thu Aug 01, 2013 3:12 pm

fci wrote:Cool that you have put together the forecast and map!!
What lead you to forecast the westerly track across SFL into the GOM.
NWS shows it headed north and taken by a trough off to the NE.
Your reasoning, (and this is not the least bit critical as you have put up a good presentation); I would just like the thought process for your conclusion

Thank you. I appreciate that :D I have put alot of faith in the GFS this year, it seems to be on its game pretty well so far (As opposed to the Euro and NAM and the wind speeds I got from the idea of a good enviroment, not from the models on that subject.
0 likes   
This post is NOT AN OFFICIAL FORECAST and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

-THE ABOVE IS THE OPINION OF DREW ONLY

BigB0882
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2284
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 12:08 am
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Contact:

#3278 Postby BigB0882 » Thu Aug 01, 2013 3:12 pm

It seems the NWS is pretty confident in this going N and then NE. I would be shocked if this went into the Gulf as they are rarely wrong with such short time frames.
0 likes   

HurricaneDREW92
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 320
Age: 26
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 11:56 am
Location: Boston, MA

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Dorian Remnants - Discussion

#3279 Postby HurricaneDREW92 » Thu Aug 01, 2013 3:12 pm

GCANE wrote:
HurricaneDREW92 wrote:Cycloneye adds S2k Disclaimer.

This post is NOT AN OFFICIAL FORECAST and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Obviously, I'm not a pro met, and my predictions should be taken with a grain of salt
HRS
12: 30kts
24: 45kts
48: 60kts
72: 65kts
96: 65kts
120:75kts

[url=http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/821/3c0.png/http://img821.imageshack.us/img821/2899/3c0.png[/url]

Looks pretty scary though:
http://img845.imageshack.us/img845/6180/w7j.gif

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Ha, thanks cycloneye :lol:



Track - about what I am thinking. Wind speeds - maybe higher.

Trying to be somewhat conservative :wink:
0 likes   
This post is NOT AN OFFICIAL FORECAST and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

-THE ABOVE IS THE OPINION OF DREW ONLY

hurricanekid416
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 179
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 2:43 pm

#3280 Postby hurricanekid416 » Thu Aug 01, 2013 3:15 pm

What are the odds it ends up in the Gulf
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “2013”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests