
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Moderator: S2k Moderators
deltadog03 wrote:Ivanhater wrote:Not sure if the overnight models will show the center relocation that looks to be taking place right now...but I think we are done seeing any westward movement in the models and will start inching eastward again. We will find out
AGreed!! I think the west shift is over....We shall see tonight.
SunnyThoughts wrote:smw, yeah they said the info goes into the models automatically...but not at the time we actually SEE the outcome. I think whomever it was said it has to go through quite a bit in discarding old data and new data being incorporated. What I was trying to say was that, by the time we actually see what the model runs are..the info has been processed a couple hours in advance. I could have very well misunderstood, but that is the way I remember it.
bella_may wrote:theavocado wrote:This post does a great job in showing how "interpolated runs" can be misleading. With the wobble of Isaac, the storm moved more westward than the forecast track had shown. When the later models were dropped on the new position, it looks as if the models have shifted west, but in actuality, the models tracks that are shown are 6 hours old and retooled to fit the current position. They are more or less shifted over with 6 hours lobbed off (well, there is more to it, but I'm simplifying). The whole track gets shifted in this case. So, if the steering level of the ridge to the east would put the storm at the LA/MS line, this would be lost in an interpolation that is the result of an unforecasted wobble.southerngale wrote:Timestamps of the maps are in the lower left corner
http://i.imgur.com/eyg7i.gif
http://i.imgur.com/qEzF8.gif
also keep in mind that most of the models going to texas are the bamm
Wx_Warrior wrote:10p (central) NHC track
[img ]http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/3479/55380249116662422918358g.jpg[/img]
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
theavocado wrote:bella_may wrote:also keep in mind that most of the models going to texas are the bamm
I like to refer to the BAMS as "models" and not models. But, there is a shift in the skilled numerical models too.
bella_may wrote:theavocado wrote:bella_may wrote:also keep in mind that most of the models going to texas are the bamm
I like to refer to the BAMS as "models" and not models. But, there is a shift in the skilled numerical models too.
ok i forgot an s. shoot me
bella_may wrote:theavocado wrote:bella_may wrote:also keep in mind that most of the models going to texas are the bamm
I like to refer to the BAMS as "models" and not models. But, there is a shift in the skilled numerical models too.
ok i forgot an s. shoot me
SunnyThoughts wrote:Cool, NHC no longer has the Fla panhandle in the cone.
bella_may wrote:I like to refer to the BAMS as "models" and not models. But, there is a shift in the skilled numerical models too.
Ivanhater wrote:SunnyThoughts wrote:Cool, NHC no longer has the Fla panhandle in the cone.
With the center reformation taking place now and the UKMET and Euro, Pensacola would be in the worst spot....check the overnight models and we will see what happens
SoupBone wrote:Ivanhater wrote:SunnyThoughts wrote:Cool, NHC no longer has the Fla panhandle in the cone.
With the center reformation taking place now and the UKMET and Euro, Pensacola would be in the worst spot....check the overnight models and we will see what happens
Ivan, would the models be initiated on the new center area or do they have to receive the official HH info to make that call?
Ivanhater wrote:SunnyThoughts wrote:Cool, NHC no longer has the Fla panhandle in the cone.
With the center reformation taking place now and the UKMET and Euro, Pensacola would be in the worst spot....check the overnight models and we will see what happens
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests