Aric Dunn wrote:wxman57 wrote:Hammy wrote:... snip...I'm wondering though were this to develop there, since the primary wave axis seems to still be over Mexico, would this be TD7 again or TD9?
... snip
Good question. It certainly had completely lost its circulation. Not too different from TD #10 in 2005 that became TD #12 and Katrina. I was just looking at satellite images of TD 10, then remnants, then TD 12. Remnants of TD 10 in 2005 looked much more impressive between being 10 and 12 than Seven does now. That would be an argument for it becoming TD 9. However, they kept "Ivan" as Ivan many days after it lost its circulation. So who knows what they'd do?
Although true the nhc has continued this as the remnants of td7 in the outlook so there should be little doubt it would td 7 again.
I went back to TD 10/12 in 2005 and the NHC continued the model guidance as "Ten" right up through 8pm the night of the 22nd of August. The next guidance that came out said "Invest 99L", but it was clearly the same system. So the argument that they're calling it remnants of Seven doesn't hold. They called 10 the remnants of 10 in 2005 then called it TD 12.
Anyway, it certainly looks quite impressive on satellite. I've measured a movement toward 295deg at 16-22 kts over the past 6 hrs. It's only 300 miles from land to the WNW, so that would put it inland within 24hrs, assuming it doesn't slow down (which I expect it to do). I'd estimate 40-50% chance it could be a TD by 21Z tomorrow. Current trend of increasing convection and apparent low-level and mid level banding is hard to ignore.